Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.27s
11 B.T.A. 415 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 4, 1928
The adverse rule announced in Baltzell v. Mitchell, 3 Fed. (2d) 428, and by the Board in Louise P. V. Whitcomb et al., 4 B. T. A. 80, Arthur H. Fleming et al., 6 B. T. A. 900, and George D. Widener et al., 8 B. T. … United States v. Field, 255 U. S. 257 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedSouth Dakota Concrete Products Co. v. Commissioner
26 B.T.A. 1429 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 31, 1932
A. 409; Nott-Atwater Co. v. Poe, 38 Fed. (2d) 1000; Commissioner v. Liberty Bank & Trust Co., 59 Fed. (2d) 320. Expenses once deducted but reduced by la.ter adjustments require similar treatment. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered for the respondent. GoodRioh dissents.
Cited 7 timesPublishedJahncke Service, Inc. v. Commissioner
20 B.T.A. 837 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 16, 1930
erred in permitting the respondent to file an amendment to his answer, and (3) if the Board did not err in so doing, whether the Board having determined the tax liability of the Shipbuilding Co. after hearing duly had on … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will he entered under Rule 50.
Cited 0 timesPublished44 B.T.A. 900 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 8, 1941
See also United States v. Provident Trust Co., 291 U. S. 272 ; Lyman v. Commissioner, 83 Fed. (2d) 811. … Farmers Loan & Trust Co. v. Bowers, supra; Mayer v. Reinecke, supra; Estate of Frederick R. Shepherd, supra.
Cited 0 timesPublished11 B.T.A. 781 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 23, 1928
HENRY V. POOR, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Poor v. Commissioner Docket No. 14261. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 11 B.T.A. 781 ; 1928 BTA LEXIS 3726 ; April 23, 1928 , Promulgated *3726 John Drye, Jr., Esq., for the petitioner. A. S. Lisenby, Esq., for the respondent.
Cited 1 timesPublishedAppeal of the Executors of the Estate of Tilton
8 B.T.A. 914 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 21, 1927
Leo Schwartz v. Commissioner, 7 B. T. A. 223. … This Board has recognized this principle in Appeal J. H. Goadby Mills, 3 B. T.
Cited 11 timesPublished12 B.T.A. 156 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 28, 1928
Tax Assessor, 14 Hawaii, 601 , and Queenan v. Palmer, 117 Ill. 619 ; 7 N. E. 613 , as to the accepted meaning of the word loss. … Reviewed by the Board. The deficiencies are in the amounts of $2,785.82 and $983.80 for the calendar years 1919 and 1921, respectively, and judgment will he entered accordingly.
Cited 1 timesPublished22 B.T.A. 721 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 12, 1931
CARNEY, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. B. F. PERKINS, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. WILLIAM ROY CARNEY, PETITIONER, v. … WRIGHT, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. QUINTON JOHNSTONE, JR., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. C. B. SEYMOUR, PETITIONER, v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGreensboro Gas Co. v. Commissioner
30 B.T.A. 1362 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 31, 1934
See Brown v. Beacher, 120 Pa. St. 590; 15 Atl. 608 ; McElwaine’s Appeal (Pa.), 11 Atl. 453 . … In Lynch v.
Cited 10 timesPublished35 B.T.A. 938 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 23, 1937
Hadden v. Commissioner, 49 Ned. (2d) 709. … Helvering v. Canfield, 291 U. S. 163 , which settled the question in so far as earned surplus on March 1, 1513, is concerned.
Cited 4 timesPublishedNorthern Fire Apparatus Co. v. Commissioner
11 B.T.A. 355 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 2, 1928
See Booth v. Union Fiber Co., 162 N. W. 677 . … Boards of directors are presumed to know those differences and when such board issues certificates, the name or designation given such certificates by the board of directors should be given effect, unless there is convincing
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Associated Raisin Co. v. Commissioner
1 B.T.A. 1251 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 26, 1925
California Associated Raisin Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 190. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 1 B.T.A. 1251 ; 1925 BTA LEXIS 2602 ; May 26, 1925 , decided Submitted March 23, 1925 . *2602 The Board will not inquire into the basis for the Commissioner's belief that jeopardy exists
Cited 7 timesPublished12 B.T.A. 519 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 11, 1928
MILES, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Miles v. Commissioner Docket No. 16805. United States Board of Tax Appeals 12 B.T.A. 519 ; 1928 BTA LEXIS 3515 ; June 11, 1928 , Promulgated *3515 1. … Any such petition must be addressed to the United States Board of Tax Appeals, Earle Building, Washington, D.C., and must be mailed in time to reach the Board within the 60-day period, not counting Sunday as the sixtieth
Cited 2 timesPublished31 B.T.A. 580 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 14, 1934
GAY, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. E. C. GAY, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. L. H. WILLIAMS, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. W. … BEASLEY, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Gay v. Commissioner Docket Nos. 58787-9, 60061.
Cited 4 timesPublishedHamilton Woolen Co. v. Commissioner
21 B.T.A. 334 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 13, 1930
A. 1186; McCaughn v. McCahan, 39 Fed. (2d) 3. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered under Rule 50.
Cited 2 timesPublishedR. A. Tuttle Co. v. Commissioner
1 B.T.A. 1218 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 23, 1925
Tuttle Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 1723. … IVINS: The Commissioner's answer contains a plea in bar to the Board's jurisdiction as to the year 1919. This contention is overruled on authority of the Board's decision in the ; and .
Cited 0 timesPublished42 B.T.A. 1196 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 14, 1940
WILSON, EXECUTRIX, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Wilson v. Commissioner Docket No. 99676. … Kernochan v. United States, 89 Ct.Cls. 507 ; 29 Fed.Supp. 860 . Franklin M. Tomlin, Esq., for the petitioner. William G. Ruymann, Esq., for the respondent.
Cited 4 timesPublishedFt. Ring Oil & Gas Co. v. Commissioner
30 B.T.A. 307 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 4, 1934
This question has been decided adversely to the petitioner’s contention *310 by the Board and the courts in Old Farmers Oil Co., 12 B.T.A. 203 , and Hughes Oil Co. v. … This regulation has been held valid in Sterling Oil & Gas Co. v. Lucas, 51 Fed. (2d) 413; aff'd., 62 Fed. (2d) 951; and Ramsey v. Commissioner, 26 B.T.A. 277 ; aff'd., 66 Fed. (2d) 316; certiorari denied, 290 U.S. 673 .
Cited 2 timesPublished36 B.T.A. 977 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 7, 1937
See Thurber v. Commissioner, 84 Fed. (2d) 815, reversing the Board in Alice V. St. Onge, 31 B. T. A. 295. … Reviewed by the Board.
Cited 26 timesPublished26 B.T.A. 26 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 10, 1932
United States v. Field, 255 U. S. 257 ; Crooks v. Harrelson, 282 U. S. 55 . … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered under Bule 50.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna