Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersbta

10,000+ results

2.53s

  • Green v. Commissioner

    37 B.T.A. 25 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 7, 1938

    V. … Eeviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered wider Bule 50.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Kuldell v. Commissioner

    25 B.T.A. 800 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 7, 1932

    Foster v. Fifield, 20 Pick. (Mass. 67, 70; Wager v. Wager, 89 N. Y. 161, 166 ; Thompson v. Thomas, 30 Miss. 152, 158 . … The Board can not determine from the stipulation what the agreement between counsel is. Judgment will be entered under Rude SO,

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Goodenough v. Commissioner

    29 B.T.A. 211 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 31, 1933

    Auditor General v. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will he entered under Rule 50. MokRis, SteRNHagen, and Muedock dissent.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hutterische Bruder Gemeinde v. Commissioner

    1 B.T.A. 1208 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 23, 1925

    Lansdon : In this appeal the only question to be determined by the Board is whether the facts as stipulated entitled the taxpayer to exemption from the payment of income taxes under the provisions of section 231 (6) of the … cruelty to children or animals, no part of the net earnings of which inures to the benefit of any private stockholder or individual. * * * The leading decided case covering the sole issue involved in this appeal is Trinidad v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Valley Waste Disposal Co. v. Commissioner

    38 B.T.A. 452 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Aug 30, 1938

    Edwards v. Cuba Railroad Co., 268 U. S. 628 ; Liberty Light & Power Co., 4 B. T. A. 155; Decatur Water Supply Co. v. Commissioner, 88 Fed. (2d) 341. … Board of Fire Underwriters of Duluth, 26 B. T. A. 860; Uniform Printing & Supply Co. v. Commissioner, 88 Fed. (2d) 75, reversing Uniform Printing & Supply Co., 33 B. T. A. 1073.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Whitman, Ward & Lee Co. v. Commissioner

    29 B.T.A. 670 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 5, 1934

    Imperial Assurance Co., 19 B.T.A. 1068 ; Swift & Co. v. United States, 38 Fed. (2d) 365; Sweets Co. of America v. Commissioner, 40 Fed. (2d) 436. … Southern Power Co. et al., 17 B.T.A. 962 ; affd., Duke Power Co. v. Commissioner, 44 Fed. (2d) 543; certiorari denied, 282 U.S. 903 ; 950 Park Avenue Corp., 20 B.T.A. 288 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Chase v. Commissioner

    19 B.T.A. 1040 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 21, 1930

    Ledyard v. Bull, 119 N. Y. 62 ; Totten v. Totten, 294 Ill. 70 . … In Blair v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Bonwit Teller & Co. v. Commissioner

    10 B.T.A. 1300 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 12, 1928

    Ley & Co. v. Commissioner, 9 B. T. A. 749. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment of no deficiency will be entered for the fetitioner.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Herff & Dittmar Land Co. v. Commissioner

    32 B.T.A. 349 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 5, 1935

    The court, however, in Commissioner v. … Doyle v. Mitchell Bros. Co., 247 U. S. 179, 183 , et seq., 38 S. Ct. 467 , 62 L. Ed. 1054 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Musselman v. Commissioner

    1 B.T.A. 41 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 4, 1924

    Musselman v. Commissioner Docket No. 160. … for a multigraph machine for the Mennonite Board of Missions and Charities.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hay Foundry & Iron Works v. Commissioner

    33 B.T.A. 144 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 30, 1935

    The Supreme Court approved that rule in Pinellas Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. Commissioner, supra. … Beviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered for the respondent.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • O'Shea v. Commissioner

    47 B.T.A. 646 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 8, 1942

    O'SHEA, EXECUTORS, PETITIONERS, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. O'Shea v. Commissioner Docket No. 105942. … Helvering v. LeGierse, 312 U.S. 531 . William J. O'Shea, Jr., Esq., and Edward D. Burns, Esq., for the petitioners. W. G. Ryman, Esq., for the respondent.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Sandura Co. v. Commissioner

    45 B.T.A. 491 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 28, 1941

    Helvering v. Moloney Electric Co., 120 Fed. (2d) 617. The contract here in question thus fails to meet the statutory test. … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered for the respondent. Leech concurs only in the result. SEC. 26. CREDITS OF CORPORATIONS.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cement Gun Co. v. Commissioner

    7 B.T.A. 1202 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 1, 1927

    United States v. Ludey, 274 U. S. 295 ; Union Metal Manufacturing Co., 1 B. T. A. 395. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered on 15 days’ notice, under Bule 50. Milliken did not participate. Sec. 234.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Myers v. Commissioner

    30 B.T.A. 44 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 8, 1934

    Petitioner relies upon the case of Cleveland Trinidad Paving Co., 20 B.T.A. 772 , and other cases to like effect, where the Board held that a portion of the compensation withheld by a city under the terms of a paving contract … Merren, 18 B.T.A. 156 ; and Union Guardian Trust Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Terrace Corp. v. Commissioner

    37 B.T.A. 263 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 1, 1938

    Pence v. Croan, 51 Ind. 336 ; Sherman v. Hogland, 54 Ind. 578 ; Evans v. Hamilton, 56 Ind. 34 ; Bentley v. Honkle, 57 Ind. 374 ; Romine v. Romine, 59 Ind. 346 ; Deutseh v. Korsmier, Id. 373 ; Price v. … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered thd$ petitioner is not liable as transferee of the assets of Thomas J. AycoeJc.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Levy v. Commissioner

    16 B.T.A. 653 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 24, 1929

    In Pirie v. Chicago Title & Trust Co., 182 U. S. 438 , a bankruptcy case, Mr. … Reviewed by the Board.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Eatonville Lumber Co. v. Commissioner

    10 B.T.A. 232 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 26, 1928

    EATONVILLE LUMBER CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Eatonville Lumber Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 8123. … The total production cost for the year was divided by the total number of board feet produced during the year, giving the average cost per board foot, which was multiplied by the number of board feet in the closing inventory

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hickory Spinning Co. v. Commissioner

    1 B.T.A. 409 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 28, 1925

    Hickory Spinning Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 367. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 1 B.T.A. 409 ; 1925 BTA LEXIS 2934 ; January 28, 1925 , decided Submitted January 15, 1925 . *2934 The Board has jurisdiction, in reviewing a deficiency determined by the Commissioner, to

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Klauber Embroidery Works v. Commissioner

    11 B.T.A. 779 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 23, 1928

    KLAUBER EMBROIDERY WORKS, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Klauber Embroidery Works v. Commissioner Docket No. 12433. … the date of final decision by said Board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.