Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.07s
45 B.T.A. 197 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 26, 1941
The Board adopts the *198 stipulation of the parties as its findings of fact. … [Reviewed by the Board. Decision will le entered for the respondent.
Cited 2 timesPublished10 B.T.A. 1156 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 5, 1928
MOUNT, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Mount v. Commissioner Docket No. 9429. … RESOLVED, That *3944 this Board accept with regret the resignation of Mr.
Cited 1 timesPublished39 B.T.A. 774 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 18, 1939
Helvering v. Stokes, 296 U&. S. 665. … Keviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered under Rule 50.
Cited 8 timesPublishedSafe Deposit & Trust Co. v. Commissioner
35 B.T.A. 259 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 15, 1937
Cohan v. Commissioner , 39 Fed. (2d) 540, 543; Bryant v. Commissioner, 76 Fed. (2d) 103, 105; Clinton Cotton Mills, Inc. v. Commissioner , 78 Fed. (2d) 292, 295. … Beviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered under Rule 50.
Cited 25 timesPublished6 B.T.A. 1084 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 29, 1927
Littleton: Upon the authority of United States v. Robbins, 269 U. S. 315 , and the Board’s opinion in the Appeal of D. Cerruti, 4 B. T.
Cited 0 timesPublishedEastern Bldg. Corp. v. Commissioner
45 B.T.A. 188 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 25, 1941
Helv ering v. Northwest Steel Rolling Mills, Inc., 311 U. S. 46 . The three decisions which petitioner relies upon, G. B. R. Oil Cor poration, 40 B. T. A. 738; Joell Co., 41 B. T. … As was pointed out by the Board in the latter case, the terms “earnings and profits of the taxable year” do not have to be written into the contract; but in. all three of those cases the Board said that there must be some
Cited 0 timesPublishedSouth Hills Trust Co. v. Commissioner
19 B.T.A. 674 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 24, 1930
Broadway Savings Trust Co. v. United States, 66 Ct. Cls. 429. This Board has held in a number of cases that the order of a bank examiner does not, per se, establish reasonableness in this connection. … Weiss v. Wiener, 279 U. S. 333 . United States v. White Dented Co., 274 U. S. 398 . Note the debit to the reserve in question on September 7, 1922.
Cited 0 timesPublished27 B.T.A. 544 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 9, 1933
A. 283) the Board, relying upon, among other decisions, those of Kate Fowler Merle-Smith, 11 B. T. A. 254, and Margaret B. Fowler, 11 B. T. … That principle, restricting the class of taxpayers to whom a deduction for depletion may be allowed, having been rejected upon appeal of the cases cited (Merle-Smith v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGreat W. Power Co. v. Commissioner
30 B.T.A. 503 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 26, 1934
Co. v. Commissioner, 33 Fed. (2d) 695; Union Pacific R.R. Co. v. Commissioner, supra. … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered under Rule 50.
Cited 2 timesPublished27 B.T.A. 1123 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 7, 1933
Phillips v. Commissioner, 283 U. S. 589 . No authority is cited for giving it a retroactive application as a remedy to enforce defunct liabilities, or as reviving them. … See Lindley v. United States, 59 Fed. (2d) 336. Those questions are academic in this proceeding and need not therefore be decided. Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered for the petitioners-
Cited 1 timesPublishedEdward L. Scheidenhelm Co. v. Commissioner
1 B.T.A. 864 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 23, 1925
Scheidenhelm Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 1223. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 1 B.T.A. 864 ; 1925 BTA LEXIS 2781 ; March 23, 1925 , decided Submitted March 17, 1925 . *2781 Where the taxpayer's sole witness admits that a portion of his testimony was false, the Board
Cited 1 timesPublishedCity Nat'l Bank v. Commissioner
2 B.T.A. 623 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 28, 1925
Phillips: Taxpayer relies upon the decisions of this Board in the Appeals of Cleveland Home Brewing Co., 1 B. T. A. 87; Russell Milling Co., 1 B. T. A. 194; and Ruh-No-More Co., 1 B. T. A. 228. … La Belle Iron Works v. United States, 256 U. S. 871 . Aeundell not participating.
Cited 2 timesPublishedYoung Men's Christian Ass'n Retirement Fund, Inc. v. Commissioner
18 B.T.A. 139 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 11, 1929
YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION RETIREMENT FUND, INC., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Young Men's Christian Ass'n Retirement Fund, Inc. v. Commissioner Docket Nos. 36261, 41599. … In Morgan v. Nauts (U.S.D.C.N.D.
Cited 5 timesPublished4 B.T.A. 823 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 15, 1926
Littleton : The decision of the question involved in this proceeding is governed by the opinion of the eourt in United States v. Robbins 269 U. S. 315 , and the decision of the Board in the Appeal of D. Cerruti, 4 B. T.
Cited 1 timesPublished36 B.T.A. 964 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 26, 1937
It is not limited to cases where such power is derived from the express terms of the instrument, Reinecke v. Smith, supra; Bowler v. Commissioner, supra; Higgins v. White, 18 Fed. Supp. 986 (on appeal C. C. … The opinion of the Board in Valentine Bliss, supra, was promulgated before the Supreme Court’s opinion in Reinecke v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedArthur Walker & Co. v. Commissioner
4 B.T.A. 151 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 21, 1926
It has previously been decided by the Board in the Appeal of Tacoma Grocery Co., 1 B. T. … Following the same reasoning used in this opinion, the Board in Appeal of Carroll Chain Co., 1 B. T.
Cited 1 timesPublished17 B.T.A. 245 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 13, 1929
OF DELAWARE, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Lang Body Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 35802. … file a petition with the Board and that the Board had jurisdiction thereof.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAmerican Seating Co. v. Commissioner
14 B.T.A. 328 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 16, 1928
Bowers v. Kerbaugh-Empire Co., 271 U. S. 170 ; Meyer Jewelry Co., 3 B. T. A. 1319; Independent Brewing Co. of Pittsburgh, 4 B. T. A. 870; New Orleans, Texas & Mexico Ry. Co., 6 B. T. A. 436; Houston Belt & Terminal Ry. … In the instant proceeding the petitioner rested its case entirely upon the facts found by the Board in the earlier decision. Pursuing the course approved by the Board in Union Metal Mfg. Co., 4 B. T.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAppeal of the Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.
3 B.T.A. 884 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 18, 1926
Both the courts amd the Board have held otherwise. Keith v. Johnson, 3 Fed. (2d) 361; Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. United States, 9 Fed. (2d) 688; Appeal of Edgar Munson, 3 B. T.
Cited 1 timesPublished4 B.T.A. 826 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 15, 1926
Littleton : The decision of the question involved in this proceeding is governed by the opinion of the court in United States v. Robbins, 269 U. S. 315 , and the decision of the Board in the Appeal of D. Cerruti, 4 B.
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna