Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersbta

10,000+ results

2.07s

  • Felber v. Commissioner

    45 B.T.A. 197 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 26, 1941

    The Board adopts the *198 stipulation of the parties as its findings of fact. … [Reviewed by the Board. Decision will le entered for the respondent.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Mount v. Commissioner

    10 B.T.A. 1156 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 5, 1928

    MOUNT, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Mount v. Commissioner Docket No. 9429. … RESOLVED, That *3944 this Board accept with regret the resignation of Mr.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Pyeatt v. Commissioner

    39 B.T.A. 774 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 18, 1939

    Helvering v. Stokes, 296 U&. S. 665. … Keviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered under Rule 50.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. Commissioner

    35 B.T.A. 259 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 15, 1937

    Cohan v. Commissioner , 39 Fed. (2d) 540, 543; Bryant v. Commissioner, 76 Fed. (2d) 103, 105; Clinton Cotton Mills, Inc. v. Commissioner , 78 Fed. (2d) 292, 295. … Beviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered under Rule 50.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Samuels v. Commissioner

    6 B.T.A. 1084 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 29, 1927

    Littleton: Upon the authority of United States v. Robbins, 269 U. S. 315 , and the Board’s opinion in the Appeal of D. Cerruti, 4 B. T.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Eastern Bldg. Corp. v. Commissioner

    45 B.T.A. 188 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 25, 1941

    Helv ering v. Northwest Steel Rolling Mills, Inc., 311 U. S. 46 . The three decisions which petitioner relies upon, G. B. R. Oil Cor poration, 40 B. T. A. 738; Joell Co., 41 B. T. … As was pointed out by the Board in the latter case, the terms “earnings and profits of the taxable year” do not have to be written into the contract; but in. all three of those cases the Board said that there must be some

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • South Hills Trust Co. v. Commissioner

    19 B.T.A. 674 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 24, 1930

    Broadway Savings Trust Co. v. United States, 66 Ct. Cls. 429. This Board has held in a number of cases that the order of a bank examiner does not, per se, establish reasonableness in this connection. … Weiss v. Wiener, 279 U. S. 333 . United States v. White Dented Co., 274 U. S. 398 . Note the debit to the reserve in question on September 7, 1922.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Goff v. Commissioner

    27 B.T.A. 544 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 9, 1933

    A. 283) the Board, relying upon, among other decisions, those of Kate Fowler Merle-Smith, 11 B. T. A. 254, and Margaret B. Fowler, 11 B. T. … That principle, restricting the class of taxpayers to whom a deduction for depletion may be allowed, having been rejected upon appeal of the cases cited (Merle-Smith v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Great W. Power Co. v. Commissioner

    30 B.T.A. 503 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 26, 1934

    Co. v. Commissioner, 33 Fed. (2d) 695; Union Pacific R.R. Co. v. Commissioner, supra. … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered under Rule 50.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Hulburd v. Commissioner

    27 B.T.A. 1123 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 7, 1933

    Phillips v. Commissioner, 283 U. S. 589 . No authority is cited for giving it a retroactive application as a remedy to enforce defunct liabilities, or as reviving them. … See Lindley v. United States, 59 Fed. (2d) 336. Those questions are academic in this proceeding and need not therefore be decided. Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered for the petitioners-

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Edward L. Scheidenhelm Co. v. Commissioner

    1 B.T.A. 864 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 23, 1925

    Scheidenhelm Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 1223. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 1 B.T.A. 864 ; 1925 BTA LEXIS 2781 ; March 23, 1925 , decided Submitted March 17, 1925 . *2781 Where the taxpayer's sole witness admits that a portion of his testimony was false, the Board

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • City Nat'l Bank v. Commissioner

    2 B.T.A. 623 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 28, 1925

    Phillips: Taxpayer relies upon the decisions of this Board in the Appeals of Cleveland Home Brewing Co., 1 B. T. A. 87; Russell Milling Co., 1 B. T. A. 194; and Ruh-No-More Co., 1 B. T. A. 228. … La Belle Iron Works v. United States, 256 U. S. 871 . Aeundell not participating.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Young Men's Christian Ass'n Retirement Fund, Inc. v. Commissioner

    18 B.T.A. 139 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 11, 1929

    YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION RETIREMENT FUND, INC., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Young Men's Christian Ass'n Retirement Fund, Inc. v. Commissioner Docket Nos. 36261, 41599. … In Morgan v. Nauts (U.S.D.C.N.D.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Appeal of Feldhusen

    4 B.T.A. 823 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 15, 1926

    Littleton : The decision of the question involved in this proceeding is governed by the opinion of the eourt in United States v. Robbins 269 U. S. 315 , and the decision of the Board in the Appeal of D. Cerruti, 4 B. T.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Pulitzer v. Commissioner

    36 B.T.A. 964 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 26, 1937

    It is not limited to cases where such power is derived from the express terms of the instrument, Reinecke v. Smith, supra; Bowler v. Commissioner, supra; Higgins v. White, 18 Fed. Supp. 986 (on appeal C. C. … The opinion of the Board in Valentine Bliss, supra, was promulgated before the Supreme Court’s opinion in Reinecke v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Arthur Walker & Co. v. Commissioner

    4 B.T.A. 151 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 21, 1926

    It has previously been decided by the Board in the Appeal of Tacoma Grocery Co., 1 B. T. … Following the same reasoning used in this opinion, the Board in Appeal of Carroll Chain Co., 1 B. T.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Lang Body Co. v. Commissioner

    17 B.T.A. 245 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 13, 1929

    OF DELAWARE, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Lang Body Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 35802. … file a petition with the Board and that the Board had jurisdiction thereof.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • American Seating Co. v. Commissioner

    14 B.T.A. 328 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 16, 1928

    Bowers v. Kerbaugh-Empire Co., 271 U. S. 170 ; Meyer Jewelry Co., 3 B. T. A. 1319; Independent Brewing Co. of Pittsburgh, 4 B. T. A. 870; New Orleans, Texas & Mexico Ry. Co., 6 B. T. A. 436; Houston Belt & Terminal Ry. … In the instant proceeding the petitioner rested its case entirely upon the facts found by the Board in the earlier decision. Pursuing the course approved by the Board in Union Metal Mfg. Co., 4 B. T.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Appeal of the Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.

    3 B.T.A. 884 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 18, 1926

    Both the courts amd the Board have held otherwise. Keith v. Johnson, 3 Fed. (2d) 361; Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. United States, 9 Fed. (2d) 688; Appeal of Edgar Munson, 3 B. T.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Appeal of Pomeroy

    4 B.T.A. 826 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 15, 1926

    Littleton : The decision of the question involved in this proceeding is governed by the opinion of the court in United States v. Robbins, 269 U. S. 315 , and the decision of the Board in the Appeal of D. Cerruti, 4 B.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.