Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.65s
4 B.T.A. 823 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 15, 1926
Littleton : The decision of the question involved in this proceeding is governed by the opinion of the eourt in United States v. Robbins 269 U. S. 315 , and the decision of the Board in the Appeal of D. Cerruti, 4 B. T.
Cited 1 timesPublished17 B.T.A. 245 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 13, 1929
OF DELAWARE, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Lang Body Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 35802. … file a petition with the Board and that the Board had jurisdiction thereof.
Cited 0 timesPublished4 B.T.A. 826 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 15, 1926
Littleton : The decision of the question involved in this proceeding is governed by the opinion of the court in United States v. Robbins, 269 U. S. 315 , and the decision of the Board in the Appeal of D. Cerruti, 4 B.
Cited 1 timesPublishedArcher Paper Co. v. Commissioner
1 B.T.A. 634 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 27, 1925
Archer Paper Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 342. … Krepps 5 shares V. B. Weatherford 1 share L. M. Hall 1 share Total 500 shares *635 The regular salaries paid to John Stagmaier, president, and W. H.
Cited 0 timesPublished4 B.T.A. 815 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 15, 1926
Littleton: The decision of the question involved in this proceeding is governed by the opinion of the court in United States v. Robbins, 269 U. S. 315 , and the'decision of the Board in .the Appeal of D. Cerruti, 4 B.
Cited 1 timesPublishedCity Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. Commissioner
39 B.T.A. 29 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 4, 1939
DUKE, JR., PETITIONER, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent. City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. Commissioner Docket Nos. 76031, 76046. … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered under Rule 50. VAN FOSSAN and ARNOLD dissent.
Cited 3 timesPublishedAmerican Seating Co. v. Commissioner
14 B.T.A. 328 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 16, 1928
Bowers v. Kerbaugh-Empire Co., 271 U. S. 170 ; Meyer Jewelry Co., 3 B. T. A. 1319; Independent Brewing Co. of Pittsburgh, 4 B. T. A. 870; New Orleans, Texas & Mexico Ry. Co., 6 B. T. A. 436; Houston Belt & Terminal Ry. … In the instant proceeding the petitioner rested its case entirely upon the facts found by the Board in the earlier decision. Pursuing the course approved by the Board in Union Metal Mfg. Co., 4 B. T.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnion Metal Mfg. Co. v. Commissioner
4 B.T.A. 287 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 20, 1926
Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 2524. United States Board of Tax Appeals 4 B.T.A. 287 ; 1926 BTA LEXIS 2329 ; July 20, 1926 , Decided *2329 1. … When he sued in court the Board's decision had not the force of a judgment, binding unless reversed, but by section 900(g), "the findings of the Board shall be prima facie evidence of the facts therein stated."
Cited 14 timesPublishedS. E. Overton Co. v. Commissioner
2 B.T.A. 1160 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 4, 1925
Overton Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 565. … board of trade.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCleveland R. Co. v. Commissioner
10 B.T.A. 310 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 27, 1928
To the same effect are Doyle v. Mitchell Bros. Co., 247 U. S. 179 , and Eisner v. Macomber, 252 U. S. 189 . … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered for the respondent.
Cited 6 timesPublished33 B.T.A. 192 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 11, 1935
Cortland Specialty Co. v. Commissioner (C. C. A., 2d Cir.), 60 Fed. (2d) 937; Gregory v. Helvering, supra; Mead Coed Co. v. Commissioner (C. C. A., 4th Cir.), 72 Fed. (2d) 22. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will he entered under Bule 50. Artjndell dissents.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNat'l Bank of Commerce v. Commissioner
40 B.T.A. 72 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 9, 1939
In that case the Board found as a fact that a constructive charge-off occurred during the taxable year. … Darling v. Commissioner (C. C. A.) 49 F. (2d) 111; Avery v. Commissioner (C. C. A.) 22 F. (2d) 6, 55 A. L. R. 1277; Stephenson v. Commissioner (C. C. A.) 43 F. (2d) 348.
Cited 24 timesPublishedArden-Rayshine Co. v. Commissioner
43 B.T.A. 314 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 14, 1941
Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered for the respondent. Black concurs only in the result. AeNold dissents. … Either the taxpayer or the Commissioner may rebut the presumption established by subsection (e) by proof of the actual extent to which the taxpayer shifted to others the burden of the Federal excise tax. * * * United States v.
Cited 5 timesPublished16 B.T.A. 915 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 5, 1929
In Ould v. Washington Hospital, 95 U. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will he entered under Rule 60.
Cited 6 timesPublishedAugust Belmont Hotel Co. v. Commissioner
18 B.T.A. 643 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 6, 1930
Arundell: No question was raised by either party as to the Board’s jurisdiction to hear these proceedings. … Metropolitan Telephone Co. v. Metropolitan Telephone Co., 141 N. Y. Sup. 598, 603; City of New York v. New York, etc., Co., 231 N. Y. 18 ; 131 N. E. 554 .
Cited 1 timesPublished44 B.T.A. 730 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 17, 1941
Furthermore, the Board and the courts have refused to enforce transferee liability where the obligation discharged constituted valid prior liens, Union Guardian Trust Co., 41 B. T. A. 1306; Commissioner v. … Phipps v. Sedgwick, 95 U. S. 3 ; Trust Co. v. Sedgwick, 97 U. S. 304 .
Cited 2 timesPublished31 B.T.A. 433 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 25, 1934
■ V v i¡* .j* «,■ ij» (6) Net loss not to produce net loss. — In computing the net loss for any taxable year a net loss for a prior year shall not be allowed as a deduction. … We must regard this holding of the opinion as being definitely overruled by the Supreme Court in Woolford Realty Co. v. Rose, supra. .Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered under Rule 50.
Cited 2 timesPublished42 B.T.A. 188 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 25, 1940
Avery v. Commissioner, 292 U. S. 210 . Furthermore, there is no necessity or reason for adopting such a holding. The case of Commissioner v. Scatena, 85 Fed. (2d) 729, affirming 32 B. T. A. 675, is distinguishable. … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will he entered for the petitioner.
Cited 1 timesPublishedTrinity Buildings Corp. of New York v. Commissioner
40 B.T.A. 1315 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 28, 1939
A. 540; affirmed sub nom Fuller Co. v. Commissioner, 92 Fed. (2d) 12. … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered for the respondent. SEC. 52. CORPORATION RETURNS.
Cited 2 timesPublished18 B.T.A. 766 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 13, 1930
CHARLES WEISBECKER (A CORPORATION), PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Weisbecker v. Commissioner Docket Nos. 30787, 41278. … Upon disallowance of the deductions claimed the petitioner appealed to this Board and the Board sustained the Commissioner's disallowance in .
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna