Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.48s
27 B.T.A. 673 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 9, 1933
Co. v. United States, 286 U. … Burnet v. Houston, 283 U. S. 223 .
Cited 11 timesPublishedCyclops Iron Works v. Commissioner
25 B.T.A. 603 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 24, 1932
In Hecht v. Malley, 265 U. … Little Four Oil & Gas Co. v. Lewellyn, 29 Fed. (2d) 137; United States v. Neal, 28 Fed. (2d) 1022; White v. Hornblower, 27 Fed. (2d) 777; Durfee Mineral Co., 7 B. T. A. 231; Alexander Trust Property, 12 B. T.
Cited 1 timesPublishedGeneral Water Heater Co. v. Commissioner
14 B.T.A. 4 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 6, 1928
A. 431, this same question was before the Board, and in construing section 234 of the 1921 Revenue Act, it was said: * * * It is not the policy of the law to allow a corporate taxpayer to deduct amounts paid in the form of … Trimyer & Co. v. Noel, 28 Fed. (2d) 781. The petitioner’s income taxes for the years in question should be recomputed upon the basis indicated in this opinion. Judgment will he entered under Bule 50.
Cited 3 timesPublishedJ. N. Pharr & Sons, Ltd. v. Commissioner
21 B.T.A. 245 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 10, 1930
V. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered for the respondent.
Cited 0 timesPublished25 B.T.A. 713 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 29, 1932
The doctrine announced by the Board in the Averill case was approved by- the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in Washburn v. Commissioner, 51 Fed. (2d) 949. Cf. Henry Turrish, 24 B. T. A. 913; Oscar E. … Averill, supra; Washburn v. Commissioner, supra; Mente v. Eisner, 266 Fed. 161 ; Rogers v. United States, sufra. It is clear petitioner was not engaged in any trade.
Cited 3 timesPublished41 B.T.A. 1217 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 22, 1940
Petitioner contends that if Burnet v. Whitehouse, supra, and Helvering v. … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will he entered that there is no deficiency and no overpayment in income tax for the year 1931.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHobbs Western Co. v. Commissioner
43 B.T.A. 5 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 4, 1940
HOBBS WESTERN COMPANY, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Hobbs Western Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 104615. … The Board has held heretofore that a determination in regard to income tax and a determination in regard to excess profits tax are separate in so far as jurisdiction of the Board is concerned.
Cited 2 timesPublished22 B.T.A. 1249 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 21, 1931
Avery v. Commissioner, 22 Fed. (2d) 6; J. M. Lyon, 1 B. T. A. 378; Norfolk Southern Railroad Co., 22 B. T. A. 302. … The Commissioner determined that upon repossession the vendor realized a gain of $20,637.50, and the Board affirmed his determination.
Cited 1 timesPublished41 B.T.A. 204 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 30, 1940
EGAN, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Egan v. Commissioner Docket No. 100587. … Now the Board concedes error in its own treatment of the one petition.
Cited 2 timesPublished25 B.T.A. 520 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 11, 1932
Since a decision was had on December 9, 1931, from the Circuit Court in the Zenith case (Tyson v. … (Gardiner v. United States, 49 F. (2d) 992; Little Four Oil & Gas Co. v. Lewellyn, 35 F. (2d) 149; Lansdowne Realty Trust v. Commissioner, 50 F. (2d) 56).
Cited 0 timesPublishedMacon, D. & S. R. Co. v. Commissioner
40 B.T.A. 1266 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 22, 1939
Substantially the same view was expressed by another court in Board v. Commissioner (C. C. … Brick v. Brick, 98 U. S. 514, 516 . In determining the true nature of a transaction, this Board is not confined “to an inspection alone of the written instruments by which it was consummated.”
Cited 3 timesPublishedHoleproof Hosiery Co. v. Commissioner
11 B.T.A. 547 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 13, 1928
Board of Commissioners of Hamilton Co. v. Carey (Ind.) 84 N. E. 761, 762 . Various circumstances may lead to the conclusion that a certain charge niade by a State is a tax. … Adler v. Whitbeck, 44 Ohio St. 539 , 572, 9 N. E. 672 ; Fritsch v. Board of Commissioners of Salt Lake City, 15 Utah, 83, 95 , 47 Pac. 1026 ; Parish of E. Feliciana v. Levy, 40 La. Ann. 332 , 4 South. 309 .
Cited 32 timesPublished29 B.T.A. 415 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 23, 1933
He seems to have dealt with its affairs with a free hand, and without advice, consent, or restraint from its board of directors or other stockholders. … Una v. Dodd, 39 N.J. Eq. 173 ; People v. Utica Insurance, 15 Johns. 392 ; Niel v. Beach, 92 Pa. 226 ; New England Mutual Life v. Phillips, 141 Mass. 535 ; Savings Bank v. Barrett, 126 Cal. 413 ; 50 Pac. 914 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedVanderbilt Trust v. Commissioner
36 B.T.A. 967 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 26, 1937
Dorr v. United States, 18 Fed. Supp. 92; Morse v. Helvering, 85 Fed. (2d) 262; Monell v. Helvering, 70 Fed. (2d) 631; Ames v. Commissioner, 49 Fed. (2d) 853. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment mill be entered for the respondent. Tyson dissents.
Cited 3 timesPublishedCharles Warner Co. v. Commissioner
8 B.T.A. 1112 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 31, 1927
CHARLES WARNER CO., SUCCESSOR TO PENN SAND & GRAVEL CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Charles Warner Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 5133. … On April 16, 1914, the board of directors approved and accepted the subscription of Joseph J. Hock *2728 of Baltimore, Md., to 500 shares of capital stock of the company at par for cash.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBankers Trust Co. v. Commissioner
33 B.T.A. 746 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 19, 1935
The precise question involved here has never been passed upon by this Board or the courts. … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered for the respondent.
Cited 2 timesPublished40 B.T.A. 722 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 18, 1939
Respondent also relies on the decision of the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirming this Board, 30 B. T. A. 1265, in Shea v. … Petitioner relies on certain decisions of this Board which have since been distinguished as inapplicable to the present circumstances in Theodore Plestcheeff, 35 B. T. A. 508; affirmed in Commissioner v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedKansas City, S. L. & C. R. Co. v. Commissioner
42 B.T.A. 1163 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 6, 1940
Blalock v. Georgia Ry. & Elec. Co., 246 Fed. 387 . * * * On appeal tbe decision of the Board was affirmed; the Circuit Court, per bland, C. … Dunlop v. James, 67 N. E. 60 (1903); Broadwell v. Banks, 134 Fed. 470 (1905). Decision will be entered v/nder Rule SO. Ain?. 70.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTERRE HAUTE, INDIANAPOLIS & EASTERN TRACTION CO. v. COMMISSIONER
24 B.T.A. 197 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 29, 1931
The question of affiliation has been before this Board and the courts many times. … Commissioner v. Hirsch & Co., supra; United States v. Cleveland, P. & E. R. Co., supra; and Denunzio Fruit Co. v. Commissioner, supra.
Cited 2 timesPublishedSand Springs Railway Co. v. Commissioner
21 B.T.A. 1291 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 21, 1931
A. 386; and Portland Cremation Association v. Commissioner, 31 Fed. (2d) 843, cited by petitioner. This amount when received constituted gross income of the corporation. … These contentions were rejected both by the Board and the Circuit Court of Appeals. See 36 Fed. (2d) 347. The reasoning of the Board and the court in that case is applicable here.
Cited 4 timesPublished
Ask Donna