Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersbta

10,000+ results

0.45s

  • Matteson Co. v. Commissioner

    1 B.T.A. 905 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 30, 1925

    Matteson Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 478. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 1 B.T.A. 905 ; 1925 BTA LEXIS 2750 ; March 30, 1925 , decided Submitted March 12, 1925 . *2750 A petition must be received by the Board within the statutory period in order to give the Board

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Ball v. Commissioner

    27 B.T.A. 388 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Dec 21, 1932

    BALL, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Ball v. Commissioner Docket No. 40926. United States Board of Tax Appeals 27 B.T.A. 388 ; 1932 BTA LEXIS 1072 ; December 21, 1932 , Promulgated *1072 1. … Louis Browns.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Crossett Timber & Development Co. v. Commissioner

    29 B.T.A. 705 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 10, 1934

    CROSSETT TIMBER & DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Crossett Timber & Development Co. v. Commissioner Docket Nos. 62294, 67775. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 29 B.T.A. 705 ; 1934 BTA LEXIS 1490 ; January 10, 1934 , Promulgated *1490 1.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Baker v. Commissioner

    28 B.T.A. 704 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 18, 1933

    Cohen v. Commissioner, 39 Fed. (2d) 540; Island Petroleum Company v. Commissioner, 57 Fed. (2d) 992. … He relies upon the decision of the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Commissioner v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Cleveland Trust Co. v. Bowers

    70 Ohio Law. Abs. 458 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 29, 1954

    The cause was submitted to the Board of Tax Appeals on the notice of appeal, a stipulation of facts filed herein under date of October 13, 1954, the transcript of the tax commissioner, and briefs of counsel. … Struble, v. Davis et al., Tax Commission, 132 Oh St 555, 8 O. O. 552, wherein the first two sections of the syllabus read as follows: “1. Sec. 2 of Art.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • DeLoss v. Commissioner

    6 B.T.A. 784 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 11, 1927

    We know of no case where it has been held by this Board, or by any court, that if á petitioner presents proof so convincing as to render it practically demonstrable that securities held by him became worthless in a given … This Board in several cases has allowed the deduction under such conditions. Henry M. Jones v. Commissioner, 4 B. T. A. 1286.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Taft v. Commissioner

    27 B.T.A. 808 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 27, 1933

    Heryford v. Davis, 102 U. S. 235 . “ Leases ” of personalty with the privilege of purchase are held conditional sales. Corbett v. Riddle, 209 Fed. 811 ; Burroughs Adding Machine Co. v. Bogdon, 9 Fed. (2d) 54; Hervey v. … A. 27; Jefferson Gas Coal Co. v. Commissioner, 52 Fed. (2d) 120; Herold v. Commissioner, 42 Fed. (2d) 942.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Appeal of Seaboard Mills, Inc.

    5 B.T.A. 575 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 20, 1926

    corporation is entitled to classification as a personal service corporation its income must be ascribed primarily to the activities of the principal owners or stockholders, and as was said by the court in the case of Matteson Co. v. … In the opinion of the Board, it is immaterial whether the income derived from capital is produced by the use of that capital in the business in which the petitioner is primarily engaged.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Zeile v. Commissioner

    20 B.T.A. 1039 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 29, 1930

    Counsel contends that the word accrued means due, and cites, as authority, Ex parte McCardle, 7 Wall. 506, 514 ; Flanigan v. Sierra County, 196 U. S. 553, 560 ; Cook v. Bray, 2 Houst. … Hanna, Executor v. United States, 68 Ct. Cls. 45; certiorari denied, 280 U. S. 102a. We aré in complete accord with the reasoning in that opinion. See also O’Brien v. Sturgess, 39 Fed. (2d) 950.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Appeal of Kramer

    4 B.T.A. 810 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 15, 1926

    Littleton : The decision of the question involved in this proceeding is governed by the opinion of the court in United States v. Robbins, 269 U. S. 315 , and the decision of the Board in the Appeal of D. Cerruti, 4 B.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Haass v. Commissioner

    37 B.T.A. 948 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 31, 1938

    In Brons Hotels, Inc., supra, the Board stated: We are not unmindful of the fact that the assumption of a mortgage is not money in a true legal sense. … A. 1196, in which the Board followed Boca Ratone Co. v. Commissioner, supra, and applied section 44 (d) of the Revenue Act of 1932.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Pierce Oil Corp. v. Commissioner

    30 B.T.A. 469 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 25, 1934

    Pierce Oil Corp. v. Commissioner Docket Nos. 49702, 49703, 49704. United States Board of Tax Appeals 30 B.T.A. 469 ; 1934 BTA LEXIS 1320 ; April 25, 1934 , Entered *1320 ADAMS *470 ORDER. … As defined in that act and continued in subsequent acts, the character of the Board functions is preeminently judicial. Cf. Blair v. Osterlein Machine Co., 275 U.S. 220 -227 ; Goldsmith v. Board, 270 U.S. 220 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Cox v. Commissioner

    38 B.T.A. 865 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 13, 1938

    Commissioner v. Wells, supra; cf. Charles W. Deeds, 37 B. T. A. 293,297; Noyes v. Hassett, 20 Fed. Supp. 31. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered for the petitioner. SEC. 504.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Fawsett v. Commissioner

    23 B.T.A. 1148 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 15, 1931

    Speaking of an analogous contention, the Board said, in Mesta Machine Co., 12 B. T. … Taylor v. American National Bank of Pensacola, 63 Fla. 631 ; 57 So. 678 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Gwin v. Commissioner

    14 B.T.A. 393 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 20, 1928

    This same transaction was before the Board in V. J. Bulleit, 3 B. T. A. 631. … V. Board, another party to the same transaction, which was decided tocl&y.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Woodrow Lee Trust Co. v. Commissioner

    17 B.T.A. 109 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Aug 16, 1929

    III-2, p. 5), published August 11, 1924, as the result of the decision rendered in Hecht v. Medley, 265 U. S. 144 . The provisions of I. … Malley [March 17, 1919] and prior to the decision in Heoht v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Binghamton Candy Co. v. Commissioner

    43 B.T.A. 327 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 15, 1941

    That period began at some time in 1935 and ended on January 6, 1936, the date on which the Supreme Court promulgated its opinion in United States v. Butler, 297 U. S. 1 . … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will he entered for the respondent.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Haussermann v. Commissioner

    23 B.T.A. 378 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 25, 1931

    HAUSSERMANN, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Haussermann v. Commissioner Docket Nos. 23101, 40307. … Brown, Esq., O. Swecker, Esq., and Stanley Suydam, Esq., for the respondent.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Thos. Goggan & Bro. v. Commissioner

    45 B.T.A. 218 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Sep 26, 1941

    . * * * In Elmer v. … In Elmer v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Smoot v. Commissioner

    25 B.T.A. 1038 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 30, 1932

    Drakely v. Gregg, 8 Wall. 242 . Cf. Winslow v. B. & O., 188 U. S. 646 . … Eareckson v. Rogers, 112 Md. 160 ; Read etc. Co. v. Nattans, 130 Md. 465 ; Manning v. Kansas Coal Co., 81 S. W. 140 ; Maryland Casualty Co. v. Gates, 290 Fed. 65 , citing Horn v. Cole, 51 N. H. 287.

    Cited 10 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.