Case law

Brown v. Varshay

District Court, W.D. Arkansas · May 21, 2020

BROWN PLAINTIFF v. … Brown v. Frey, 806 F.2d 801, 803-04 (8th Cir. 1986) (emphasis added).

Ferrari v. Brown

District Court, W.D. Arkansas · Mar 5, 2020

Civil No. 2:20-CV-02003 SHERIFF RON BROWN, NURSE BECKY DEFENDANTS CORRERO, and DR. … Jackson v. Nixon, 747 F.3d 537, 541 (8th Cir. 2014) (quoting Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007)). Even a pro se Plaintiff must allege specific facts sufficient to support a claim. Martin v.

Phillips v. Brown

District Court, W.D. Arkansas · Apr 20, 2020

Civil No. 2:20-CV-02059 DEPUTY BROWN and DEFENDANTS OFFICER SAMANTHA GOODWIN … Jackson v. Nixon, 747 F.3d 537, 541 (8th Cir. 2014) (quoting Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007)). Even a pro se Plaintiff must allege specific facts sufficient to support a claim. Martin v.

Krecker v. Brown

District Court, W.D. Arkansas · Apr 13, 2020

P. 41(b); Line v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630-31 (1962) (stating that the district court possesses the power to dismiss sua sponte under Rule 41(b)). … Brown v. Frey, 806 F.2d 801, 803-04 (8th Cir. 1986) (emphasis added).

Horton v. Brown

District Court, W.D. Arkansas · Feb 28, 2020

Civil No. 2:20-CV-02001 SHERIFF RON BROWN (Crawford County, DEFENDANTS Arkansas), LIEUTENANT DOWDY, MRS. … See Holden v.

Brown v. Helder

District Court, W.D. Arkansas · Aug 29, 2019

TOM BROWN PLAINTIFF V. … Myers v.

Brown v. Helder

District Court, W.D. Arkansas · Apr 22, 2019

TOM BROWN PLAINTIFF V. … Brown v. Frey, 806 F.2d 801, 803-04 (8th Cir. 1986) (emphasis added).

Hildebrand v. Brown

District Court, W.D. Arkansas · Mar 22, 2019

Jackson v. Nixon, 747 F.3d 537, 541 (8th Cir. 2014) (quoting Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007)). However, even a pro se Plaintiff must allege specific facts sufficient to support a claim. Martin v. … Cody v. Weber, 256 F.3d 764, 768 (8th Cir. 2001) (quoting Goff v. Nix, 113 F.3d 887, 892 (8th Cir. 1997)).

Brown v. Helder

District Court, W.D. Arkansas · Feb 14, 2019

TOM BROWN PLAINTIFF V. … Flynn v. Brown, 395 F.3d 842, 844 (8th Cir. 2005) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted).

Brown v. Novak

District Court, W.D. Arkansas · Mar 5, 2019

See Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223, 232 (2009). … Brown pursuant to the alleged conspiracy. See Ballard Grp., Inc. v. BP Lubricants USA, Inc., 2014 Ark. 276, at *17-*18.

Brown v. Fergerson

District Court, W.D. Arkansas · Feb 26, 2018

BROWN PLAINTIFF v. … Jackson v. Nixon, 747 F.3d 537, 541 (8th Cir. 2014) (quoting Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007)). However, a pro se plaintiff must allege specific facts sufficient to support a claim. Martin v.

Owens v. Brown

District Court, W.D. Arkansas · Feb 14, 2018

Jackson v. Nixon, 747 F.3d 537, 541 (8th Cir. 2014) (quoting Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007)). … VIII; see also Butler v.

Ritchie v. Brown

District Court, W.D. Arkansas · Dec 15, 2017

P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630-31 (1962) (stating that the district court possesses the power to dismiss sua sponte under Rule 41(b)). … Brown v. Frey, 806 F.2d 801, 803-04 (8th Cir. 1986) (emphasis added). III.

Brown v. Jody

District Court, W.D. Arkansas · Feb 5, 2018

Plaintiff's Claim Four centers on his interpretation of the Arkansas Parole Board's disposition of his Parole Revocation Hearing. Plaintiff filed a copy of the Parole Board's written report in the record. … Brown v. Nix, 33 F.3d 951, 954 (8th Cir. 1994).

Peltason, Tenenbaum & Harris, Inc. v. Refunding Board

16 F. Supp. 179 · District Court, W.D. Arkansas · Dec 17, 1935

Cargile v. New York Trust Co. (C.C.A.) 67 F.(2d) 585, 587 . The law applicable is clearly stated by the Supreme Court in Board of Liquidation v. … Union Light, Heat & Power Co. v. Railroad Commission (D.C.) 17 F.(2d) 143 ; J. & A. Freiberg Co. v. Dawson (D.C.) 274 F. 420 , affirmed Dawson v.

Cochran v. Chidester Sch. Dist. of Ouachita

456 F. Supp. 390 · District Court, W.D. Arkansas · Aug 30, 1978

Defendants point out that in Sullivan v. Meade County Ind. School Dist., 387 F.Supp. 1237 (D.S.D.1975), and in Brown v. … Collins, supra, but such post-termination hearings procedures clearly do not meet the requirements of Board of Regents v. Roth, supra. See Wagner v. Little Rock School District, 373 F.Supp. 876 (E.D.Ark.1973). Brown v.

United States v. Rhodes

97 F. Supp. 468 · District Court, W.D. Arkansas · Oct 28, 1950

It relies upon the case of Interstate Commerce Commission v. F & F Truck Leasing Corporation, D. C. … Judge Joyce further stated on page 19 of 78 F.Supp. of his opinion, Interstate Commerce Commission v.

Appler v. Mountain Pine School District

342 F. Supp. 1131 · District Court, W.D. Arkansas · May 30, 1972

On May 23, 1955, the court, in the case of Johnson v. … In Nethercutt v.

United States v. 2,184.81 ACRES OF LAND

45 F. Supp. 681 · District Court, W.D. Arkansas · Jul 8, 1942

Brown so that the title of the intervenor, School District 38, could have a “legal commencement”. In the case of United States v. … See, also, Reed v. Money, 115 Ark. 1 , 170 S.W. 478 ; Butler v. Johnson, 180 Ark. 156 , 20 S.W.2d 639 ; Penny et al. v. Central Coal & Coke Co., 8 Cir., 138 F. 769 .

First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board

426 F. Supp. 454 · District Court, W.D. Arkansas · Feb 25, 1977

Smith v. F.T.C., 403 F.Supp. 1000, 1017-1018 (D.C.Del.1975); National Courier Assoc. v. Board of Governors, 170 U.S.App.D.C. 301 , 516 F.2d 1229, 1241 (1975). … First National Bank of Fayetteville v. Smith, supra; Bank of Ozark v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board, 402 F.Supp. 162 (W.D.Ark. 1975).