Case law

Whitmore v. State

2015 Ark. App. 445 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 2, 2015

CR-12-528] V. HONORABLE JOHN N. … Code Ann. § 16-93-308(d) (Supp. 2013). 2 Hill v. State, 2012 Ark.

Bob Cole Bail Bonds, Inc. v. State

65 Ark. App. 5 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jan 13, 1999

In AAA Bail Bond Company v. … In Holt Bonding Co. v.

Jackson v. Smith

2010 Ark. App. 681 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 20, 2010

As stated in Somes v. … Brown v. Blake, 86 Ark. App. 107 , 161 S.W.3d 298 (2004). The property interest may be shown by possession or a present right to possession when a defendant cannot show a better right. Id.

Cole v. Cole

89 Ark. App. 134 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jan 5, 2005

See Brown v. Brown, 76 Ark. App. 494 , 68 S.W.3d 316 (2002). As a rule, when the amount of child support is at issue, the appellate court will not reverse the trial judge absent an abuse of discretion. McWhorter v. … See Brown v. Brown, supra; Weir v. Phillips, 75 Ark. App. 208 , 55 S.W.3d 804 (2001). There was no evidence that the trial court considered this in setting support.

Kristy Schneider and Erik Schneider v. Arkansas Department of Human Services and Minor Child

2020 Ark. App. 455 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 30, 2020

Appellants ask this court to overturn Parker v. … App. 443, 156 S.W.3d 742 (2004). 15 Hickman v. Kralicek Realty & Constr. Co., 84 Ark. App. 61, 66, 129 S.W.3d 317, 320 (2003). 16 Honeycutt v. Honeycutt, 2017 Ark.

Rockin J Ranch, LLC v. Director, Department of Workforce Services

469 S.W.3d 368 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 9, 2015

We do not conduct de novo review in appeals from the Board of Review. West v. Dir., 94 Ark. App. 381, 231 S.W.3d 96 (2006). … Maxfield v. Dir., 84 Ark. App. 48, 129 S.W.3d 298 (2003). Our function on appeal, however, is not to merely rubber stamp decisions issued by the Board of Review. Price v. Dir., 2013 Ark. App. 205.

Chad Kelley, in His Capacity as Jefferson County Corner and Individually v. Bryan Adams, Brandon Adams, and Skylar Wilson

2024 Ark. App. 440 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 18, 2024

BROWN, Judge Appellant Chad Kelley brings this interlocutory appeal after the Faulkner County Circuit Court affirmed in part and denied in part his motion to dismiss based on immunity. … No. 4 v. Cir. Ct. of Crittenden Cnty., 316 Ark. 290, 295, 871 S.W.2d 368, 371 (1994). 7 Deitsch v. Tillery, 309 Ark. 401, 833 S.W.2d 760 (1992). 8 Sweeden v. Farmers Ins.

Ronnie Robinson v. Director, Division of Workforce Services

2021 Ark. App. 485 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 8, 2021

However, our function on appeal is not merely to rubber-stamp decisions arising from the Board. Thomas v. Dir., 2019 Ark. App. 468, 587 S.W.3d 612; Wilson v. Dir., 2017 Ark. … The Board concluded that Robinson failed to rebut the presumption that a letter is received by the person to whom it is addressed, citing Skaggs v. State, 287 Ark. 259, 697 S.W.2d 913 (1985), and Moore v.

Hole in the Wall Nwa, LLC v. City of Bella Vista

609 S.W.3d 8 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 2, 2020

Brown v. State, 375 Ark. 499, 292 S.W.3d 288 (2009). However, we will not give statutes a literal interpretation if it leads to absurd consequences that are contrary to legislative intent. Brock, supra. … See also City of Centerton v.

Allen Thomas v. Director, Department of Workforce Services, and Weyerhaeuser Nr Company

2019 Ark. App. 468 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 23, 2019

However, our function on appeal is not merely to rubber-stamp decisions arising from the Board. Wilson v. Dir., 2017 Ark. … Issues of witness credibility and the weight to be afforded their testimony are matters for the Board to determine. Weinstein v. Dir., 2013 Ark. App. 374, 428 S.W.3d 560.

Belair v. State

2014 Ark. App. 453 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 10, 2014

The trial court did not rely on anything recounted in Brown’s testimony to revoke appellant’s probation. … Stillwell v. State, 2010 Ark. App. 546. Thus, any error in allowing Brown’s testimony regarding other alleged violations was harmless. We affirm the revocation. Affirmed.

Eddie Lee v. Arkansas Department of Human Services and Minor Child

2025 Ark. App. 322 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 21, 2025

See Martin v. Ark. Dep’t of Hum. Servs., 2015 Ark. App. 407, at 4, 465 S.W.3d 881, 884; Brown v. Ark. Dep’t of Hum. Servs., 2016 Ark. App. 455, at 4. … App. 503, at 9, 560 S.W.3d at 833; Brown, 2016 Ark. App. 455, at 4.

Tommy F. Hamilton v. State of Arkansas

612 S.W.3d 185 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 21, 2020

Eastin v. … In United States v.

Lawhon v. Ayres Corp.

67 Ark. App. 66 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jun 16, 1999

In Brown v. … Cumberland Financial Group, Ltd. v. Brown Chemical Co., 34 Ark. App. 269 , 810 S.W.2d 49 (1991).

Jones v. Dir.

2019 Ark. App. 341 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Aug 28, 2019

However, that is not to say that our function on appeal is merely to ratify whatever decision is made by the Board. Boothe v. Dir., 59 Ark. App. 169, 954 S.W.2d 946 (1997). … In Foster v. Director, 2013 Ark.

Jones v. Union Motor Co., Inc.

29 Ark. App. 166 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 8, 1989

The appellant, however, concedes that the Arkansas Supreme Court’s holding in Brown v. Ford, 280 Ark. 261 , 658 S.W.2d 355 (1983), contradicts this position but urges this Court to overrule that decision. … Brown admits to receiving notice from Ford Credit.

Van Venrooij v. Director, Division of Workforce Services

2021 Ark. App. 213 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 5, 2021

OF REVIEW V. … On appeal, we review the findings of the Board in the light most favorable to the prevailing party, reversing only when the Board’s findings are not supported by substantial evidence. Welch v. Dir., 2019 Ark.

Squyres v. State

476 S.W.3d 839 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 18, 2015

See Mason v. State, 2014 Ark. … VAUGHT and BROWN, JJ., agree. Depper Law Firm, Inc., by: Robert L. Depper, Jr., for appellant.

Davis v. Dir.

2013 Ark. App. 515 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 18, 2013

On appeal, we review the findings of the Board in the light most favorable to the prevailing party, reversing only when the Board’s findings are not supported by substantial evidence. Crouch v. … Ballard v. Dir., Dep’t of Workforce Servs., 2012 Ark. App. 371. Issues of credibility of the witnesses and weight to be afforded their testimony are matters for the Board to determine. Id. Ms.

Sharpe v. State

2013 Ark. App. 436 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Aug 28, 2013

See Holloway, supra; Warren v. State, 2010 Ark. App. 226, at 3-4; Pierce v. State, 79 Ark. App. 263, 265–66, 86 S.W.3d 1, 2 (2000); Weeks v. State, 64 Ark. App. 1, 5, 977 S.W.2d 241, 243 (1998). … Tyler v. State, 2013 Ark. App. 212, at 2. Even a proposed challenge to the validity of controlling precedent on appeal must first be raised in the trial court. See State v.