Case law

Damron v. Damron

574 S.W.3d 166 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Mar 13, 2019

Etoch was less than six months, he was not entitled to a jury trial under the reasoning of Taylor v. Hayes , supra . We adopted the rule set out in Taylor v. Hayes in Edwards v. … Glover, Vaught, and Brown, JJ., agree. Gladwin and Hixson, JJ., dissent. In interpreting Ark.

Claire Hooker v. Arkansas Department of Human Services and Minor Child

2023 Ark. App. 99 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Feb 22, 2023

See Jackson v. Ark. Dep’t of Hum. Servs., 2021 Ark. … See Mitjans v. Ark. Dep’t of Hum. Servs., 2018 Ark. App. 472, 561 S.W.3d 747 (issues not raised below are not preserved for appeal). Affirmed. WOOD and BROWN, JJ., agree.

Rusty L. Latham v. State of Arkansas

2019 Ark. App. 323 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jun 5, 2019

In Jones v. … BROWN, J., agrees. MURPHY, J., concurs. MIKE MURPHY, Judge, concurring. “Read the dadgum statute!”

Crista Ann Steadmon v. State of Arkansas

701 S.W.3d 69 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Nov 20, 2024

Code Ann. § 5-73-103(a)(1). 14 Taylor v. State, 2022 Ark. App. 464, 655 S.W.3d 330. 15 White v. State, 2014 Ark. App. 587, 446 S.W.3d 193. 16 Johnson v. State, 2014 Ark. … Block v. State, 2015 Ark. App. 83, at 6, 455 S.W.3d 336, 340 (quoting Harrison v.

Development & Construction Management, Inc. v. City of North Little Rock

83 Ark. App. 165 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 1, 2003

See Brown v. Mitchell, 225 Ga. 115 , 166 S.E.2d 571 (1969). However, this argument is refuted by the document itself. Paragraph 17 provides in part: Legal Description. … In Creighton v.

Blake v. Shellstrom

2012 Ark. App. 28 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jan 4, 2012

BROWN, Judge. | ¶ This case arises out of an automobile accident that occurred on May 5, 2008, between the appellant, Scott Blake, and appellees Jonathan Shellstrom and Robin Whitten. … Barringer v. Hall, 89 Ark.App. 293 , 202 S.W.3d 568 (2005). . Luedemann v. Wade, 323 Ark. 161 , 913 S.W.2d 773 (1996). . Esry v. Carden, 328 Ark. 153 , 942 S.W.2d 846 (1997). . See Depew v.

K.B. v. State

2017 Ark. App. 478 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 27, 2017

See, e.g., Lowe v. State, 2016 Ark. App. 389, at 6, 500 S.W.3d 176, 180. We hold there is no basis for reversal on this argument. This court will not second-guess the fact-finder’s credibility determinations. Brown v. … See Hayes v. State, 169 Ark. 883, 886, 277 S.W. 36, 37 (1925); Whittaker v.

Cook v. State

77 Ark. App. 20 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Mar 20, 2002

In Brown v. … In Savannah v. State, 7 Ark.

Tatum v. State

2016 Ark. App. 80 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Feb 10, 2016

Brown v. State, 374 Ark. 341, 288 S.W.3d 226 (2008). Here, D.H. offered specific testimony in that regard. … See Yarbrough v. State, 370 Ark. 31, 257 S.W.3d 50 (2007); see also Gwin v.

Shores v. Lively

492 S.W.3d 81 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 4, 2016

See Bowen v. Bowen, 2012 Ark. … In Brandt v. Willhite, 98 Ark.

United Farms, Inc. v. Gist

2009 Ark. App. 717 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Oct 28, 2009

Minnesota Mining & Mfg. v. Baker, 337 Ark. 94 ; 989 S.W.2d 151 (1999). … Laundry, Inc. v. Ferren, 92 Ark. App. 65 , 211 S.W.3d 11 (2005).

Dollarway School District v. Lovelace

90 Ark. App. 145 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Feb 23, 2005

Farmers Cooperative v. Biles, 77 Ark.App. 1 , 69 S.W.3d 899 (2002). … See Roberts v. Leo Levi Hospital, 8 Ark.App. 184 , 649 S.W.2d 402 (1983). See also Williams v. Brown’s Sheet Metal/CAN Ins. Co., 81 Ark. App. 459 , 105 S.W.2d 382 (2003).

Sikora v. Bogard

2016 Ark. App. 619 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 14, 2016

In Circle D Contractors, Inc. v. … HARRISON, GLOVER, HIXSON, HOOFMAN, and BROWN, JJ., agree. 5

Rodgers v. Arkansas Department of Human Services

2010 Ark. App. 452 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · May 26, 2010

Lee v. Ark. Dep’t of Human Servs., 102 Ark.App. 337 , 285 S.W.3d 277 (2008); Hall v. Ark. Dep’t of Human Servs., 101 Ark.App. 417 , 278 S.W.3d 609 (2008). … See Smith v. Ark. Dep’t of Human Servs., 100 Ark.App. 74 , 264 S.W.3d 559 (2007). Therefore, the circuit court’s best-interest determination is not clearly erroneous. 1 sAffirmed. BAKER and BROWN, JJ., agree. .

Endurance Freight Logistics, LLC and Glad Rents, Inc. v. Jetonga Reddick

638 S.W.3d 859 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Dec 1, 2021

Ross Sys., Inc. v. Advanced Env’t Recycling Techs., Inc., 2011 Ark. 473. … Grp., LLC v. CR Crawford Constr., LLC, 2020 Ark. App. 173, 596 S.W.3d 590. Affirmed. GRUBER and BROWN, JJ., agree. Wright, Lindsey & Jennings LLP, by: Scott A. Irby, Gary D.

Adkins v. Arkansas Department of Human Services

518 S.W.3d 746 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Apr 12, 2017

Ellis v. Ark. Dep’t of Human Servs., 2016 Ark. 441, 505 S.W.3d 678. … BROWN, J., concurs. Worlow Law, LLC, by: Jacob Worlow, for appellant. Andrew Firth, Office of Chief Counsel, for appellee. Chrestman Group, PLLC, by: Keith L.

Draper v. Conagra Foods, Inc.

92 Ark. App. 220 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Sep 7, 2005

Hisaw v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co., 353 Ark. 668 , 122 S.W.3d 1 (2003); Brown v. Wyatt, 89 Ark. App. 306 , 202 S.W.3d 555 (2005). … Hisaw v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co., supra; Brown v. Wyatt, supra. Appellants argue that the circuit court erred in ruling that PST was not an agent or employee of appellee.

Higgins v. State

94 Ark. App. 328 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Mar 1, 2006

See Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972); Haire v. State, 340 Ark. 11 , 8 S.W.3d 468 (2000). … Appellant also cites Silva v. Brown, 416 F.3d 980 (9th Cir. 2005), regarding the non-disclosure of the mental competence of a co-defendant to the defense team prior to trial.

Mandy Ann Cobb v. State of Arkansas

2026 Ark. App. 109 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Feb 18, 2026

See also Brown v. … Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 478-79 (1966).

Lineham v. Hyde

454 S.W.3d 257 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jan 28, 2015

Fonken v. Fonken, 334 Ark. 637, 642 , 976 S.W.2d 952, 954 (1998); see also McGee v. McGee, 100 Ark. … Kinard and Brown, JJ., agree. . After the hearing but before the court entered its order, Sarah filed a motion to intervene, which the circuit court denied. . See Troxel v.