Case law

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Jan 19, 2006

Accord, City of Jacksonville v. … As established in McCutchen [ v.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Jul 27, 2004

For purposes of this section, officers and employees of county government shall include: (A) All elected county and township officers; (B) All district judicial officers serving a county; (C) All members of county boards, … Nos. 2004-106 ; 2003-007; 2002-273; 2001-042; 2000-072; 99-349; 98-275; 94-283; and 94-446, citing Van Hovenberg v. Holman, 201 Ark. 370 , 144 S.W.2d 719 (1940); Madden v. United States Associates, 40 Ark.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Aug 6, 1997

Coleman v. State, 327 Ark. 381 , 938 S.W.2d 845 (1997); Richie v. Board of Educ. , 326 Ark. 587 , 933 S.W.2d 375 (1996). … Phillips Petroleum v. Heath, 254 Ark. 847 , 497 S.W.2d 30 (1973); see also Moore v. State, 321 Ark. 249 , 903 S.W.2d 154 (1995).

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Jan 2, 1990

In Miller v. … In Rainwater v.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Apr 26, 2004

[m]aintain on a sound financial basis the state and all of its agencies, boards, commissions, departments, and institutions, all referred to in this chapter as `agencies' unless otherwise necessary." … See generally Fountain v. State , 348 Ark. 359 , 72 S.W.3d 511 (2002); Yarbrough v. Witty , 336 Ark. 479 , 987 S.W.2d 257 (1999).

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 30, 2009

. § 14-55-102 , in pertinent part as follows: *Page 5 In Springfield v. … City of Little Rock v. Smith , 204 Ark. 692 , 695 , 163 S.W.2d 705 , 707 (1942) (quoting Beaty v. Humphrey , 195 Ark. 1008 , 115 S.W.2d 559 (1938).

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Mar 19, 2004

Tappan v. Helena Fed. Savings Loan Assn., 193 Ark. 1023 , 103 S.W.2d 458 (1937). … county, or municipal government or be connected in any way in any official capacity with any political party or political organization. (2) No person as enumerated in this subsection shall be eligible as a member of the board

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Aug 17, 1994

Registrars 1 shall, and at their discretion at other times may, print or otherwise duplicate and publish lists of registered voters by precincts, and may distribute such lists free of cost, or, with the approval of the County Board … No. 93-405 and Blaylock v.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Jan 14, 2010

Smith v. Fox , 358 Ark. 388 , 392 , 193 S.W.3d 238 , 241 (2004). … E.g., Brown v. State , 375 Ark. 499 , 502 , 292 S.W.3d 288 , 290 (2009).

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 23, 1994

See generally Bolden v. Watt, 290 Ark. 343 , 710 S.W.2d 428 (1986). … Contractors Licensing Board v. Butler, 295 Ark. 223 , 748 S.W.2d 129 (1988). I am uncertain, however, whether the rule in question would be accepted as clearly reflecting this interpretation.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 6, 2006

Reding v. … See Yates v.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 28, 2000

The specific information that is "authorized to be maintained and collected" by the Arkansas Crime Information Center is determined by the Supervisory Board of the Arkansas Crime Information Center. … See McCambridge v. City of Little Rock, 298 Ark. 219 , 766 S.W.2d 909 (1989).

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 7, 1994

Supp. 1993) (providing that volunteer firefighters or board members of a volunteer fire department shall not be "civilly liable for personal injury or property damage resulting from any act or omission of a volunteer fire … In Walden v. Hart, 243 Ark. 650 , 420 S.W.2d 868 (1967), the Court refers to this section (formerly Ark. Stat.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Oct 16, 1997

See Smith v. State, 264 Ark. 874 , 575 S.W.2d 677 (1979). … This conclusion is supported by the decisions in Viswanathan v. Miss. County C.C. Board, 318 Ark. 810 , 887 S.W.2d 531 (1994), and Ark. Livestock Poultry Comm'n v.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Jan 10, 1991

See First National Bank v. Nakdimen, 111 Ark. 223 , 226 , 163 S.W. 785 (1914). … Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602 , 612-13 (1971). Legislative articulation of a secular purpose normally is given deference by courts and satisfies the "secular purpose" test. Board of Education v.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Mar 18, 2004

Bailey v. McCuen, 318 Ark. 277 , 285 , 884 S.W.2d 938 (1994), citing Finn v. McCuen, 303 Ark. 418 , 798 S.W.2d 34 (1990); Gaines v. McCuen, 296 Ark. 513 , 758 S.W.2d 403 (1988); Hoban v. Hall, supra ; and Walton v. … • The amendment authorizes the Arkansas Department of Health to adopt implementing regulations, whereas the State Board of Health currently has substantial regulatory authority with respect to the prescribing and use of drugs

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 13, 1987

In Walden v. … See Meyer v. State Board of Equalization and Assessment, 185 Neb. 490 , 176 N.W. 920 (1970); A.G. Opinion No. 82-132 (September 7, 1982).

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Nov 4, 2004

provides in relevant part: The Legislative Auditor shall have access at all times to all of the books, accounts, reports, confidential or otherwise, vouchers, or other records of information in any state office, department, board … See generally Donoho v. Donoho, 318 Ark. 637 , 887 S.W.2d 290 (1994). The FOIA is a general statute that affords "any citizen of the State of Arkansas" the right to inspect and copy non-exempt public records.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Nov 18, 2003

Arkansas Public Service Commission v. Pulaski County Board of Equalization, 266 Ark. 64 , 582 S.W.2d 942 (1979).

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Mar 10, 1992

These cases include Brooks v. City of Sherwood, Pulaski County Chancery Court No. 91-3870; Robinson, et al. v. City of Little Rock, Pulaski County Chancery Court No. 91-2526; Bethany, et al. v. … E 91-324; Nelson, et al. v. City of Texarkana, Miller County Chancery Court No. E 91-310-2; Stidham, et al. v. City of Springdale, Washington County Chancery Court No. E 91-767; Williamson, et al. v.