Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
2,277 results
2.17s
Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Apr 23, 1993
Hinshaw, Executive Director Arkansas Fire Police Pension Review Board P.O. Drawer 34164 Little Rock, AR 72203 Dear Ms. … An issue similar to that about which you have inquired was addressed by the Supreme Court of Arkansas in the case of Hestand v. Erke, 227 Ark. 309 , 298 S.W.2d 44 (1957).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 20, 2001
Chaney v. Bryant, 259 Ark. 294 , 532 S.W.2d 741 (1976); Moore v. Hall, 229 Ark. 411 , 316 S.W.2d 207 (1958). … Bailey v. McCuen, 318 Ark. 277 , 285 , 884 S.W.2d 938 (1994), citing Finn v. McCuen, 303 Ark. 418 , 798 S.W.2d 34 (1990); Gaines v. McCuen, 296 Ark. 513 , 758 S.W.2d 403 (1988); Hoban v. Hall, supra ; and Walton v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Oct 3, 1991
Eilbott Chairman, Jefferson County Board of Election Commissioners Barraque Main Streets Pine Bluff, AR 71601 Dear Mr. … Hand v. State, Nev. S.Ct. No. 21215, decided Aug. 28, 1991.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Sep 22, 1997
Supp. 655 (E.D.Ark. 1994) (upholding the State Board of Apportionment's post 1990 census plan (for the 1992 elections and thereafter) over the objections of the plaintiffs). … The first was Shaw v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Aug 31, 2000
See, e.g., City of Fayetteville v. Edmark, 304 Ark. 179 , 801 S.W.2d 275 (1990); and Swaney v. Tilford, 320 Ark. 652 , 898 S.W.2d 462 (1995). … See McMahan v. Board of Trustees of the University of Arkansas, 255 Ark. 108 , 111 , 499 S.W.2d 56 (1973); and Ops. Att'y Gen. 97-030 ; 95-173; and 94-085.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Sep 22, 1992
Board of County Commissioners of Butler County, 425 Pa. 274 , 228 A.2d 747 (1967)), has never addressed whether this language applies only to private entities. … Forby v. Fulk, 214 Ark. 175 , 214 S.W.2d 920 (1948).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Oct 20, 2000
Womack v. Foster, 340 Ark. 124 , 152 , 8 S.W.3d 854 (2000). Failure to indicate a statutory reason for voting absentee on the application disqualifies a voter from casting an absentee ballot. … The letter or postcard shall contain information sufficient for the county board of election commissioners and the county clerk to accept the letter or postcard in lieu of the application form; or (ii) An applicant may transmit
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Aug 4, 2006
See, e.g., Lowe v. … The ordinance cannot be ravished to the detriment of one qualified employee by mere resolution of the City Board of Directors which denies only that employee his authorized benefits. City of Little Rock v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jan 6, 2009
See Dailey v. … Hink v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 23, 1987
Rightsell v. Carpenter, 188 Ark. 21 , 64 S.W.2d 101 (1933). … McDonald v. Wasson, 188 Ark. 782 , 67 S.W.2d 722 (1934).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 17, 2008
A school board's discretion to dispose of district property is clearly bounded by the terms of these constitutional provisions. Accord Op. Att'y Gen. … See City of Blytheville v. Parks , 221 Ark. 734 , 255 S.W.2d 962 (1953).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Nov 19, 2002
You state that the rural water district in question was organized as a regional facilities board under Arkansas law. … The only basis for withholding unlisted information that is not contained in personnel records would be the constitutional privacy right, as outlined in McCambridge v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Nov 12, 1986
The state may delegate the power to contract to its offices, boards or departments. 81A C.J.S. States 156 (1977). … Federal Express Corp. v. Skelton, 265 Ark. 187 , 78 S.W.2d 1 (1979); Bush v. Martineau, 174 Ark. 214 , 22-23, 295 S.W. 9 (1927); Russ v. Womack, 174 Ark. 971 , 74, 298 S.W. 222 (1927).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 1, 2007
See Benton v. Gunter, 342 Ark. 543 , 29 S.W.3d 719 (2000); Davis v. Holt, 304 Ark. 619 , 804 S.W.2d 362 (1991); Charisse v. Eldred, 252 Ark. 101 , 477 S.W.2d 480 (1972); Thomas v. … McClendon v. Board of Health, 141 Ark. 114 , 216 S.W. 289 (1919). See also Ops. Att'y Gen. 95-296 ; 93-095; 92-045; 91-383; and 91-283 (applying art. 19, § 3 to appointive city offices). *Page 5 In Ark. Op. Att'y Gen.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Mar 21, 2008
See Chandler v. Board of Trustees , 236 Ark. 256 , 365 S.W.2d 447 (1963). … See also Clark v. State , 308 Ark. 84 , 824 S.W.2d 345 (1992) (Brill, J., concurring); Brewer v. Hawkins , 241 Ark. 460 , 408 S.W.2d 492 (1966); Samples v. Grady , 207 Ark. 724 , 182 S.W.2d 875 (1944).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jan 23, 2007
Harris v. City of Little Rock , 344 Ark. 95 , 105 , 40 S.W.3d 214 (2001). See also Holman v. City of Dierks , 217 Ark. 677 , 233 S.W.2d 392 (1950). The Arkansas Supreme Court in City of Marion v. … See also City of Hot Springs v. Vapors , 298 Ark. 444 , 769 S.W.2d 1 (1989); cf. Rainwater v. Haynes , 244 Ark. 1191 , 428 S.W.2d 254 (1968). City of Marion v. Baioni , 312 Ark. at 425 . See also Barnhart v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jan 27, 1992
In Mounts v. Chafin, No. 20017 (W.Va. S. … The ACIC is not under the authority of the Arkansas State Police, but is set up under the supervision of a supervisory board (A.C.A. § 12-12-201 (a)).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Nov 5, 1991
See Flat Top Lake Ass'n, Inc. v. U.S., 868 F.2d 108 (4th Cir. 1989); Stewart v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 305 A.2d 516 , (D.C.App. 1973), and generally, Burrow v. … See generally City of Fort Smith v. Bates, 260 Ark. 777 , 544 S.W.2d 525 (1976); James Company, Inc. v. Sheppard, 249 Ark. 81 , 458 S.W.2d 752 (1970); City of Buffalo v. Joslyn, 527 P.2d 1106 (Wyo. 1974); Bobo v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 15, 1989
Ry. v. Higgins, 44 Ark. 293 (1884), and generally Lamb v. Midwest Mutual Insurance Company, 296 F. Supp. 131 , (W.D.Ark. 1969) aff'd 421 F.2d 179 (8th Cir. 1970). … Robinson v. Beaumont, 725 S.W.2d 839 (1987).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Sep 11, 1989
See generally, Standard Oil Co. v. Peck, 342 U.S. 382 (1952), and Mikos v. Ringling Bros. … It seems to us that these stipulated facts inescapably establish that Youngstown had `so acted upon the [imported ores]' (Brown v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna