Case law

Hussey v. State

332 Ark. 552 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 16, 1998

This appeal is a companion case to Harris v. … Majors testified the same as he had in Harris, plus he described the second man out of Gathings’s building as wearing a brown or tan flannel shirt with a red shirt underneath and a blue or black toboggan on his head — the

Lumsden v. Erstine

205 Ark. 1004 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 7, 1943

The first of these cases is that of Wallace v. Brown, 22 Ark. 118 , 76 Am. … The holding in this case of Wallace v. Brown, supra, as reflected in the headnotes above copied, was modified by the opinion in the case of Worthen v.

Alexander v. Tomlinson

40 Ark. 216 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 15, 1882

The goods ’ were placed on board the steamer Big Rock, at Pine Bluff, by plaintiff, and consigned to Alcorn, at Pastoría, by bill of lading. … See the whole section from which this clause is copied; Gantt’s Digest, Sec. 2957, and State Bank v. Williams, 6 Ark., 156.

Spohn v. State

310 Ark. 500 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 28, 1992

Brown, Justice. The appellant, Larry Spohn, was convicted of first degree murder and sentenced to forty years in prison. He argues on appeal that the circuit court erred in two respects. … White v. State, 290 Ark. 130 , 717 S.W.2d 704 (1986); see also Mauppin v. State, 309 Ark. 235 , 831 S.W.2d 104 (1992); Easter v. State, 306 Ark. 615 , 816 S.W.2d 602 (1991); Cox v.

Satterfield, Mayor v. Fewell

202 Ark. 67 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 24, 1941

See, also, Pugh v. City of Little Rock, 35 Ark. 75 ; Hill v. Rector, 161 Ark. 574 , 256 S. W. 848 . … , but can only be invoked to compel the officer or board to exercise such discretion; and.this the mayor has done.

MIC v. Barrett

313 Ark. 527 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 21, 1993

GLAZE and BROWN, JJ., dissent. BROWN, Justice, dissenting. This case turns on a unique set of circumstances. … Barrett argued our case of Catlett v.

Hobbs v. Grubbs

2015 Ark. 205 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 14, 2015

Hobbs, No. 39CV- 13-84 (Lee County Circuit Court), and Brown v. Hobbs, No. … Today, we also address the appeal of Hobbs v.

Clark v. State

323 Ark. 211 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 29, 1996

In Greenlee v. … McKuen told the jury that the victim told her that "he stuck his penis in me" and that his penis was brown and hard.

Western Randolph County Road Improvement District v. Clifford

150 Ark. 94 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 10, 1921

It was further agreed in the contract that the purchaser should, within ten days, deliver to the secretary of the board a certified check, in the sum of $10,000, “to guarantee compliance with the terms of the contract, ’ … Cherry v. Bowman, 106 Ark. 39 ; Thibault v. McHaney, 119 Ark. 188 . It follows that the decree of the chancery court was correct, and the same is affirmed.

Jones v. State

347 Ark. 409 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 17, 2002

BROWN, Justice. This is an appeal by appellant Blake Jones from an adjudication of delinquency based on the offense of terroristic threatening in the first degree, a Class D felony. … B.C. v.

Smallwood v. State

326 Ark. 813 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 9, 1996

Brown, Justice, concurring. … While the case relied upon for this result, Hill v.

Bland v. Mahan

245 Ark. 450 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 21, 1968

Oliger, the Conway County Board of of Election Commissioners, appeal from a judgment declaring Ark. Stat. … In Crowly v.

Johns v. Hudson

182 Ark. 1162 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 26, 1931

Young v. Berman, 96 Ark. 78 , 131 S. W. 62 , 34 L. R. A. (N. S.) 977 ; and Frank v. Rogers, 156 Ark. 120 , 245 S. W. 311 . … Morris v. Raymond, 132 Ark. 450 , 201 S. W. 116 ; Brown Bros. & Carnahan v. Smiley, 158 Ark. 640 , 244 S. W. 351 ; Bish v. Woods, 162 Ark. 463 , 258 S. W. 352 ; and National Life & Accident Ins. Co. v.

Heath v. Midco Equipment Co.

256 Ark. 14 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 19, 1974

Lyle Brown, Justice. The issue before us is whether three rear dump trucks sold by appellee to Big Rock Stone & Material Co. are subject to our sales tax act. … Cheney, Comm’r. v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., 237 Ark. 161 , 371 S.W. 2d 843 (1963). In Wiseman v.

State ex rel. Hecht & Bro. v. Spikes

33 Ark. 801 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 15, 1878

Walker v. Bradley, 2 Ark., 578; Burton v. Hynson, 7 Ib., 502. … State Use v. Brown et al., 30 Ark., 761, but no doubt he may waive the tender or payment of his fees in advance. The judgment of the court below must be affirmed.

Bush v. Martineau

174 Ark. 214 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 23, 1927

Co. v. State, 99 Ark. 1 , 136 S. W. 938 ; Vance v. Austell, 45 Ark. 400 ; Carson v. St. Francis Levee Dist., 59 Ark. 513 , 27 S. W. 590 ; Butler v. Board, etc., 99 Ark. 100 , 137 S. W. 251 . … The legislative intent was to vest in the board the discretionary power of making the notes payable wherever sold, and St.

Prothro v. Holder

252 Ark. 163 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 20, 1972

Lyle Brown, Justice. The question in this case is whether 120 acres of land which was originally a part of the estate of William tí. … AMENDMENT TO OPINION We held as late as Brown v. Smith, 240 Ark. 1042 , 405 S.W. 2d 249 (1966), that a partition deed does not create any new title. That holding was based upon Johnson v.

Newboles v. Newboles

169 Ark. 282 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 6, 1925

The arbitrators rendered the following award: “We, the board of arbitrators, agree that the purported will of Sarah Newboles, deceased, is nullified by the affidavit of the said Sarah Newboles, deceased, of date July 14, … This court in the case of Abraham v.

Edgar Lumber Co. v. Denton

156 Ark. 46 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 27, 1922

Arkadelphia Milling Co., 153 Ark. 236 ; Buena Vista Veneer Co. v. Broadbent, 107 Ark. 528 ; Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Grubbs, 97 Ark. 406 ; St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. v. Going, 90 Ark. 387 . … Co. v.

Little Rock & Fort Smith Railway Co. v. Chapman

39 Ark. 463 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 15, 1882

Porter v. Durham & Brown, 74 N. C., 767 .) The proper-qualification of the doctrine, by the same court, is found in the previous case of Raleigh and Augusta Air Line R. R. v. Wicker et al. … In accordance with these views as to limitations of the power, and the care required, are Beard v. Murphy, 37 Vermont, 99; Coates v. City of Davenport, 9 Iowa, 37 ; Ross v. City of Clinton, 46 Iowa, 606 ; Aurora v.