Case law

Hale v. Hobbs

443 S.W.3d 533 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 2, 2014

E.g., Brown v. Hobbs, 2014 Ark. 267, at 2. Hale first contends that the circuit court erred in denying his petition because the sentencing orders are facially invalid. … Recently, in Hobbs v.

Hollman v. State

235 Ark. 662 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 5, 1962

State v. Browning, 206 Ark. 791 , 178 S. W. 2d 77 . Whether Hollman was denied an opportunity to call a lawyer was a disputed issue of fact which the trial court could resolve against the accused. … The case is not dissimilar in principle to United States v.

Pine Bluff Co. v. Whitlaw

147 Ark. 152 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 24, 1921

Carter v. Brown, 136 Ark. 23 . … In Bona v.

Law v. State

375 Ark. 505 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 5, 2009

See, e.g., Bailey v. … See, e.g., Brown v. State, 374 Ark. 341 , 288 S.W.3d 226 (2008); McGehee v. State, 344 Ark. 602 , 43 S.W.3d 125 (2001). 3 . Mary moved in with Warren after her house was condemned in 2001. 4 . Warren cites Thomas v.

Fulmer v. Holcomb

261 Ark. 580 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 16, 1977

There was evidence that Godfrey had advised the city officials that he would not accept reappointment if the board was to continue to be inactive, but if the board was to be active, he would be glad to serve. … In advancing this argument, appellants rely on Williams v. Dent, supra.

Tyrun Lamont Jones

2019 Ark. 300 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 24, 2019

Green v. State, 2016 Ark. 386, 502 S.W.3d 524. … See Martinez-Marmol, 2018 Ark. 145, 544 S.W.3d 49; see also Brown v. State, 2012 Ark. 399, 424 S.W.3d 288.

Smith v. Alexander

245 Ark. 567 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 4, 1968

Lyle Brown, Justice. Louise Smith, plaintiff-appellant, sought recovery for damages arising out of a collision between her car and a vehicle driven by defendant-appellee, Jere Marie Alexander. … In Madison Smith Cadillac Co. v.

Tucker Enterprises, Inc. v. Hartje

278 Ark. 320 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 7, 1983

Robinson v. Merritt, Judge, 229 Ark. 204 , 314 S.W.2d 214 (1958). In Harris Distributors, Inc. v. … See International Harvester Co. v. Brown, 241 Ark. 452 , 408 S.W.2d 504 (1966). Additionally, Centurion Homes, which was served in Texas pursuant to our long-arm statute (Ark. Stat.

Arkansas State Highway Comm'n v. Billingsley

247 Ark. 49 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 2, 1969

Lyle Brown, Justice. This is a highway condemnation case wherein the taking and construction for widening of an existing highway by the Arkansas State Highway Commission took most of the landowners’ frontage. … Perhaps the leading authority of this court is Campbell v. Arkansas State Highway Comm’n., 183 Ark. 780 , 38 S. W. 2d 753 (1931).

Brophy v. John E. Mahaffey & Associates, Inc.

252 Ark. 811 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 12, 1972

Lyle Brown, Justice. Appellants, Ralph Brophy and Ottis Watson, were the developers of a mobile home park in or near Fayetteville. They engaged the services of appellee, John E. … Saad v. Arkansas Trust Co., 225 Ark. 33 , 280 S.W. 2d 894 (1955).

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Park

254 Ark. 129 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 26, 1973

Lyle Brown, Justice. Appellant sought judgment on the basis of its ownership of a promissory note purportedly executed by appellee. … Home Indemnity Co. v. Jelks, 187 Ark. 370 , 59 S.W. 2d 1028 (1933). Finally U.S.F.&G. complains that the trial court did not submit to itself as a jury, the various signatures for comparison. They were so compared.

Vance v. State ex rel. Crittenden County

35 Ark. 176 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 15, 1879

the said sum of $1,995, belonging to the court-house and jail' fund, was received by said "Wallace in money, but averred that it was paid to him by the collector in treasurer’s certificates, or state scrip, and that the board … Gantt's Digest, sec. 2813; English v. Oliver, 38 Ark., 317; Parham v. Izard, 30 Ark., 557. Those so received and paid over by the collector, the evidence showed, were issued prior to the act.

Beane v. Stroope

200 Ark. 922 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 17, 1940

.: Watson would not permit him to have any part in the management of the store, but paid him' $6 per week for his work, retaining $4 per week of that amount for his board. … See, also, Pledger v. Birkhead, 156 Ark. 443 , 246 S. W. 510 , and cases there cited.

McWhirter v. Penny

82 Ark. 244 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 1, 1907

Carpenter v. Glass, 67 Ark. 135 ; Beebe v. DeBaun, 8 Ark. 510 ; Prater v. Frazer, 11 Ark. 249 ; Britt v. Aylett, 11 Ark. 475 ; Wallace v. Brown, 17 Ark. 449 .

American State Bank, Charleston v. Street Imp. Dist. No. 3

197 Ark. 986 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 6, 1939

The details and plans of the improvement may be worked out by the board of improvement after the establishment of the district petitioned for, but the discretion of the board is limited to carrying out the purpose of the … W. 101 ; Kempner v. Sanders, 155 Ark. 321 , 244 S. W. 356 ; Jarrett v. Baird, 161 Ark. 31 , 255 S. W. 564 ; Selz v. Paving Distriot No. 1 of McGehee, 173 Ark. 245 , 292 S. W. 133 ; Dunbar v.

Hopson v. State

327 Ark. 749 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 24, 1997

See United States v. Mays, 822 F.2d 793 (8th Cir. 1987); United States v. Greene, 591 F.2d 471 (8th Cir. 1979). However, in Conley v. … Brown, J., not participating. Special Justice John Clayton Randolph joins in this opinion.

Flowers v. State

362 Ark. 193 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 5, 2005

Also testifying on behalf of the State was William Keith Brown. Brown testified that he attended the party at Cotton Belt and that when he arrived, Appellant was already there. … V.

Higginbottom v. Waugh

313 Ark. 558 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 21, 1993

Brown, Justice. The appellants, Alice Higginbottom and James Franklin Higginbottom, as trustees and individuals, appeal from a summary judgment in favor of the appellees, Jerry Waugh and Clem Moore. … Lovell v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 310 Ark. 791 , 839 S.W.2d 222 (1992); Harvison v. Charles E. Davis & Assoc., 310 Ark. 104 , 835 S.W.2d 284 (1992) ; Reagan v.

Hambay v. Williams

335 Ark. 352 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 10, 1998

Brown, Justice. The appellants, Charles Hambay and others (collectively referred to as Ham-bay), appeal from an order of dismissal and summary judgment. … Richardson v. Rodgers, supra; Tucker v. Lake View Sch. Dist. No. 25, supra; Reeves v. Hinkle, 321 Ark. 28 , 899 S.W.2d 841 (1995); Cortese v. Atlantic Richfield, 317 Ark. 207 , 876 S.W.2d 581 (1994).

City of Dardanelle v. City of Russellville

372 Ark. 486 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 28, 2008

Williamson v. Sanofi Winthrop Pharms., 347 Ark. 89 , 60 S.W.3d 428 (2001). … Townsend v. Standard Indus., 235 Ark. 951, 954 , 363 S.W.2d 535, 537 (1962).