Case law

Lee v. Villines

328 Ark. 189 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 21, 1997

Appellants rely on Venhaus v. … Brown, J., concurs. Imber, J., not participating. I

Anderson v. Stone

190 Ark. 122 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 7, 1935

"While the facts here are different in many particulars from those in the case of Poch v. Taylor, 186 Ark. 618 , 54 S. … In the case of Poch v.

Arkansas State Police Commission v. Smith

338 Ark. 354 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 8, 1999

McQuay v. Arkansas State Board of Architects, 337 Ark. 339 , 989 S.W.2d 499 (1999); Social Work Licensing Board v. Moncebaiz, 332 Ark. 67 , 962 S.W.2d 797 (1998); Files v. … Wright v. Arkansas State Plant Board, 311 Ark. 125 , 842 S.W.2d 42 (1992). We have upheld the termination of Arkansas State Police officers in several cases.

Worley v. State

259 Ark. 433 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 8, 1976

Conway v. State, 256 Ark. 131 , 505 S.W. 2d 758 ; Brown v. State, 252 Ark. 846 , 481 S.W. 2d 366 ; Parker v. State, 179 Ark. 1064 , 20 S.W. 2d 113 . … Brown v. State, supra; Thacker v. State, supra; Conway v. State, supra; Shinsky v. State, supra.

Johnson v. State

101 Ark. 159 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 27, 1911

Drew v. State, 10 Ark. 82 ; Parrott v. State, 10 Ark. 574 ; Brown v. State, 10 Ark. 607 ; Stith v. State, 13 Ark. 683 ; Portis v. State, 27 Ark. 360 . … In the case of Tully v.

Pickle v. State

2015 Ark. 286 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 25, 2015

See State v. … Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47 (1979).

Thompson v. Fischer

364 Ark. 380 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 15, 2005

See Rowe v. Fisher, 239 Ark. 721 , 393 S.W.2d 767 (1965); Boyette v. Vogelpohl, 92 Ark.App. 436 , 214 S.W.3d 874 (2005). … HANNAH, C.J., BROWN and IMBER, JJ., concur. ROBERT L. BROWN, Justice, concurring. I concur.

Tucker v. Durham

285 Ark. 264 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 18, 1985

The conclusion of fraud, which Maddox was not required to plead, Harvey v. Eastman Kodak Co., 271 Ark. 783 , 610 S.W.2d 582 (1981), is evident. … Van Houten v. Better Health Insurance Association of America, 238 Ark. 815 , 384 S.W.2d 465 (1964). Nor are we in doubt about the proof.

Pennington v. Harvest Foods, Inc.

326 Ark. 704 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 25, 1996

Co. v. … See also Clay v.

Purvis v. Hubbell

273 Ark. 330 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 13, 1981

In Williams v. … In Wayland v.

Cocks v. Simmons

55 Ark. 104 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 14, 1891

The authorities upon the subject are too numerous for reference, but we adopt the views of the Supreme Court of Michigan, as expressed in Page v. Webster, 8 Mich., 263 ; see Maul v. Rider, 51 Penn. … St., 377; Freeman on Co-tenancy and Partition, sec. 158; Cooley on Taxation, p. 500; Brown v. Hogle, 30 Ill., 119 ; Moore v. Woodall, 40 Ark., 42. 4. Tax sale— Description.

Keith v. Drainage Dist. No. 7 of Poinsett County

183 Ark. 786 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 11, 1931

A receivership might lie had, or the board of directors might be compelled by a mandamus to levy a larger per cent, of the betterments to be collected. Faulkner Lake Drainage Dist. v. Williams, 169 Ark. 592 , 276 S. … Kochtitzky v. Mercantile Trust Co., 16 Fed. (2d) 227; Canal Const. Co. v. Federal Life Ins. Co., 21 Fed. (2d) 928.

Daniels v. State

333 Ark. 620 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 18, 1998

Brown, Justice. … See Smith v. Shelter Mut. Ins. Co., 327 Ark. 208 , 937 S.W.2d 180 (1997); Scarbrough v. Cherokee Enterprises, 306 Ark. 641 , 816 S.W.2d 876 (1991).

Early v. Kelley

562 S.W.3d 205 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 13, 2018

Brown v. State , 315 Ark. 466 , 869 S.W.2d 9 (1994). The present appeal stems from Early's petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed in the Lee County Circuit Court. … See Early v. Norris , CV-08-465, 2008 WL 2310967 (Ark. June 5, 2008) (unpublished per curiam). Citing Johnson v.

Arkansas Insurance Department v. Baker

358 Ark. 289 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 24, 2004

Brown, 288 Ark. 422 , 706 S.W.2d 369 (1986). During the 2003 legislative session, the General Assembly debated tort reform. … Because the majority holds that this case does not fit within the Gipson v. Brown, 288 Ark. 422, 426 , 706 S.W.2d 369 (1986), exception, I respectfully dissent.

George v. State

270 Ark. 335 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 22, 1980

Rogers v. State, 88 Ark. 451 , 115 S.W. 156 (1908). … See, e.g., Brown v. State, 262 Ark. 298 , 556 S.W. 2d 418 (1977). Any improper motive attributable to Ms. Westmoreland would likely flow from her close relationship with the decedent, Jerry French.

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Park

254 Ark. 129 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 26, 1973

Lyle Brown, Justice. Appellant sought judgment on the basis of its ownership of a promissory note purportedly executed by appellee. … Home Indemnity Co. v. Jelks, 187 Ark. 370 , 59 S.W. 2d 1028 (1933). Finally U.S.F.&G. complains that the trial court did not submit to itself as a jury, the various signatures for comparison. They were so compared.

Lincoln County v. Simmons

39 Ark. 485 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 15, 1882

Rieffe v. Connor, 10 Ark., 241; Brandenburg v. The State, 24 ib., 50; Patterson v. Temple, 27 ib., 202; Kirsh v. Lincoln Co., 36 ib., 589; Peay v. Duncan, 20 ib , 85; Jessup v. Spears, 38 ib., 457. … Lincoln Circuit Court in a cause between the present appellees and the County Clerk, in which it was adjudged that the raising of the values placed by the assessor upon the appellee’s lands through the action of the County Board

McPeek v. White River Lodge Enterprises

325 Ark. 68 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 17, 1996

Logan County v. Tritt, 302 Ark. 81 , 787 S.W.2d 239 (1990); Jolly v. Hartje, 294 Ark. 16 , 740 S.W.2d 143 (1987). … BROWN, J., concurs in part and dissents in part. BROWN, Associate Justice, concurring in part; dissenting in part. I agree with part of the majority opinion but take issue with one significant point.

City of West Helena v. Bockman

221 Ark. 677 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 2, 1953

We said in City of Little Rock v. Sun Building & Developing Company, 199 Ark. 333 , 134 S. … Section 7, “C” provides: “In Residential Zone ‘A’, all uses not specifically permitted, or permissible, upon approval of the Appeal Board shall be prohibited.”