Case law

Baker v. Adams

198 Ark. 482 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 5, 1939

State Refunding Board, 197 Ark. 790 , 124 S. W. 2d 960 , and will not again be reviewed. … Morgan v. Morgan, 171 Ark. 173 , 283 S. W. 979 .

Arkansas Release Guidance Foundation v. Hummel

245 Ark. 953 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 13, 1969

Citing Kessler v. Smith, 142 N.E. 2d 231 , 104 Ohio App. 213 , appeal dismissed Smith v. Village of Glenwillow, 146 N.E. 2d 308 , 167 Ohio St. 91 .” The case of City of Little Rooh v. … Mengel, et al., Zoning Board of Appeals, 54 N.E. 2d 329 , they “. . . are not technical words of art or words which have been defined by statute or which have acquired a rigid meaning by judicial construction.

Woodall v. Hunnicutt Construction

340 Ark. 377 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 17, 2000

When the board that the two workers were standing on fell off the scaffolding, appellant fell down to the ground, but Summerhill, being on the other side of the board, was thrown up eleven feet. … White v. Georgie-Pacific Corp., supra.

Drake v. Thyng

37 Ark. 228 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 15, 1881

In the case of Rodgers v. Batcheler, 12 Peters, 221 , Mr. Justice Story delivering the opinion, announces this principle in clear and emphatic language. … Another item» consists of Tinker’s board bill and sundries, charged to Thyng & Drake, $18.00, without any evidence of authority from the firm.

City of Crossett v. Anthony

250 Ark. 660 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 10, 1971

Brown v. Peach Orchard, 162 Ark. 175 , 257 S. W. 732 . There was testimony that a forty-acre tract of land owned by W. M. … George Rose Smith, Brown and Byrd, JJ., dissent.

In re Special Task Force- proposed amends. to Ark. R. Civ. P. 11 & 12

2014 Ark. 344 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Aug 7, 2014

The Supreme Court invalidated a portion of the statute in Summerville v. Thrower, 369 Ark. 231, 253 S.W.3d 415 (2007). … In Crockett & Brown v. Wilson, 321 Ark. 150, 901 S.W.2d 826 (1995), the Supreme Court held that an order imposing monetary sanctions under Rule 11 must explain the basis for the trial court’s decision.

St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Paul

64 Ark. 83 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 1, 1897

The act in question in that case provided for the appointment of a board to assess damages, and that if either party refused to abide by the assessment of the board, and a suit was brought, the party refusing should be taxed … Scales v. State, 47 Ark. 481 ; Churchill v. Hill, 59 Ark. 54, 64 ; Leep v. Railway Company, 58 Ark. 407 ; People v. Mahaney, 13 Mich. 481, 496-7 ; Lehman v. McBride, 15 Ohio St. 573 ; Shields v. Bennett, 8 W.

Harrison v. Collins

247 Ark. 210 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 22, 1969

Terral v. Brooks, 194 Ark. 311 , 108 S. W. 2d 489 (1937). In Berry v. Cato, 220 Ark. 36 , 245 S. … Fogleman and Brown, JJ., dissent.

Less v. Grice

107 Ark. 581 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 7, 1913

See also Adler v. Hathcock, 55 Ark. 579 . … Shoe Co. v.

Helena Gas Co. v. Rogers

98 Ark. 413 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 20, 1911

Co. v. Aven, 61 Ark. 131 , 32 S. W. 500 ; Strange v. Bodcaw Lumber Co., 79 Ark. 490 ; Pugh v. Texarkana Light & Traction Co., 86 Ark. 36 . … As to whether the digging of the hole and covering it with the boards as indicated, when finished, and lqgving it there for five days without any further care and attention to keep it covered or otherwise guarded, was the

Baldwin v. Williams

74 Ark. 316 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 25, 1905

McGaughey v. Brown, 46 Ark. 25 . … This court in Ringo v.

Dials v. Bryant

211 Ark. 212 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 3, 1947

Greer v. Vaughan, 128 Ark. 331 , 194 S. W. 232 ; Driver v. Martin, 68 Ark. 551 , 60 S. W. 651 ; Scott v. Mills, 49 Ark. 266 , 4 S. W. 908 ; Brown v. Bocguin, 57 Ark. 97 , 20 S. W. 813 ; Sanderson v. … W. 2d 965 ; Norwood v. Mayo, 153 Ark. 620 , 241 S. W. 7 ; Boynton v. Ashabranner, 75 Ark. 415 , 88 S. W. 2d 566, 1011 , 91 S. W. 20 .

Lemaire v. Henderson

174 Ark. 936 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 3, 1927

board of education. … Little Rock v. North Little Rock, 72 Ark. 195 , 79 S. W. 785 ; Harrington v. White, 131 Ark. 291 , 199 S. W. 92 ; Lee Wilson & Co. v. Compton Bond & Mortgage Co., 103 Ark. 452 , 146 S. W. 110 ; State v.

East Arkansas Lumber Co. v. Beard

178 Ark. 1144 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 11, 1929

Hinton v. Brown, 174 Ark. 1025 , 298 S. W. 198 ; 20 R. C. L., §§ 190, 194.

JACOB HARTZ SEED COMPANY v. Thomas

253 Ark. 176 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 9, 1972

See Hunter v. Summerville, 205 Ark. 463 , 169 S.W. 2d 579 ; Williams Mfg. Co. v. Walker, 206 Ark. 392 , 175 S.W. 2d 380 . … See Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. Norsworthy, 244 Ark. 399 , 425 S.W. 2d 320 ; Cook v. Brown, 246 Ark. 11 , 436 S.W. 2d 482 .

Teer v. Plant

238 Ark. 92 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 11, 1964

Clem v. Missouri Pacific R. Co. 223 Ark. 887 , 269 S. W. 2d 306 ; Price v. Price, 207 Ark. 804 , 182 S. W. 2d 879 ; Hershey v. Thompson, 50 Ark. 484 , 8 S. W. 689 . Neither is it sufficient to constitute color of title. … Greer v. Vaughn, 128 Ark. 331 , 194 S. W. 232 ; Driver v. Martin, 68 Ark. 551 , 60 S. W. 651 ; Scott v. Mills, 49 Ark .266, 4 S. W. 908 ; Brown v. Bocquin, 57 Ark. 97 , 20 S. W. 813 ; Sanderson v.

State v. Banks

322 Ark. 344 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 6, 1995

On May 9, 1994, appellants Bobby Banks and Willie Butler were seen in a 1977 brown and beige Grand Prix near Little Rock Central High. Butler was driving and Banks was a passenger. … See also Bateman v. State, 265 Ark. 307 , 578 S.W.2d 216 (1979).

McCoy v. State

270 Ark. 145 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 8, 1980

Moser v. State, 266 Ark. 200 , 583 S.W. 2d 15 (1979); Alford v. State, 223 Ark. 330 , 266 S.W. 2d 804 (1954). … U.S. v. Moody, 530 F. 2d 809 (8th Cir. 1976); Moser, supra. Ark. Stat.

State v. Houpt

302 Ark. 188 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 30, 1990

Initially, it cites Rakas v. Illinois, 439 U.S. 128 (1978), and Rawlings v. … See United States v. Sanchez, 689 F.2d 508 (5th Cir. 1982); Wilson v. State, 692 S.W.2d 661 (Tex. Cr. App. 1984); People v. Brown, 410 N.E.2d 505 (Ill. App. 1980); State v. Grundy, 25 Wash.

El Dorado Improvement Co. v. Citizens' Bank

85 Ark. 185 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 27, 1908

Co. v. Bemis Lumber Co., 67 Ark. 542 ; Stiewel v. Webb Press Co., 79 Ark. 45 ; Klein v. German National Bank, 69 Ark. 140 . … The note sued on being accommodation paper, and that fact being known to the bank when it took the note, coupled with the further fact that the action of Smith in issuing the note was never authorized by the board of directors