Case law

Shivey v. Shivey

337 Ark. 262 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 15, 1999

Brown, Justice. Appellee Kenneth Paul Shivey moved to dismiss the appeal filed by appellant Bettie Katherine Shivey on several grounds. … Shivey v. Shivey, CA 98-1127 (December 16, 1998) (per curiam).

Koontz v. LaDow

133 Ark. 523 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 8, 1918

In Linclsay, Guardian, v. … Brown, 38 Ark. 469 , that a payment in part satisfaction would not extend the time in which execution might be issued, but would remove the bar of the statute of limitations for the purpose of maintaining an action within

Dansby v. State

319 Ark. 506 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 20, 1995

California v. Brown, 479 U.S. 538 (1987); Roberts v. Louisiana, 431 U.S. 633 (1977); Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153 (1976). … California v. Brown, supra. Not only must relevant mitigating evidence be admitted, it must actually be considered, which in appropriate cases means specifically instructing the jury to do so. Penry v.

Fort Smith Building & Loan Ass'n v. Little

181 Ark. 1055 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 23, 1930

Batton v. Jones, 167 Ark. 478 ; and Ozark-Badger Co. v. Roberts, 171 Ark. 1105 . Again, the defendant retained $'20 for the commission claimed to be due on investment stock sold to Otis Wingo. … Williams, a vice president of the association, at the first meeting of the board of directors after Little resigned as secretary and manager, the board of directors gave Little a $1,000 bonus for the services he had rendered

Bloomer v. Cone

92 Ark. 622 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 22, 1909

Jones v. Mitchell, 83 Ark. 77 , and cases cited. Again in the case of Beecher v. … Brown v. Nelms, 86 Ark. 369 , and cases cited supra on this question. We find no error in the record, and the decree will be affirmed.

Deitsch v. Tillery

309 Ark. 401 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 26, 1992

. § 1983 , as applied to school districts and their employees and local school board members. … Battle v. Harris, supra.

Coons v. Lawler

237 Ark. 350 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 9, 1963

Some of our cases explaining and applying these requirements are these: Dowdle v. Wheeler, 76 Ark. 529 , 89 S. W. 1002 ; Sanderson v. Thomas, 192 Ark. 302 , 90 S. W. 2d 965 ; DeMers v. Graupner, 186 Ark. 214 , 53 S. … W. 2d 8 ; Crawford v. Davis, 147 Ark. 126 , 227 S. W. 5 ; Brown v. Bocquin, 57 Ark. 97 , 20 S. W. 813 ; Sharp v. Johnson, 22 Ark. 79 ; and Fulcher v. Dierks, 164 Ark. 261 , 261 S. W. 645 .

Fort Smith School District v. Beebe

322 S.W.3d 1 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 4, 2009

Parker v. Perry, supra. … Nac-caman Williams, all in their official capacities as members of the State Board of Education. 3 .

Oak Leaf Mill Co. v. Littleton

105 Ark. 392 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 21, 1912

Holmes v. Bluff City Lumber Co., 97 Ark. 180 ; Ozan Lumber Co. v. Bryan, 90 Ark. 223 . In the case of Wilcox v. … Co. v. Bragg, 69 Ark. 402 ; St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. Buckner, 89 Ark. 58 ; Pulaski Gas Light Co. v. McClintock, 97 Ark. 576 .

Robertson v. Robertson

231 Ark. 573 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 25, 1960

Lehman v. First National Bank, 189 Ark. 604 , 74 S. W. 2d 773 ; Purcell v. Vincent, 211 Ark. 486 , 200 S. W. 2d 970 . … In the early case of Purdy v.

School District No. 22 v. Traywick

118 Ark. 597 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 24, 1915

The contract on which he sues was signed by two of the directors of the 'district, and the question in the case is whether or not the meeting of the board of directors at which the alleged contract was. signed was a legal … directors to contract in the name of their district for the employment of a teacher without the consent of the third director, has been discussed in a number of decisions of this court, the last of which was the case of Rice v.

Porch v. Arkansas Milling Co.

65 Ark. 40 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 5, 1898

Such cases are Stewart v. Brown, 37 N. Y. 350 , 93 Am. Dec. 578 ; Blanchard v. Paschal, 68 Ga. 32 , 45 Am. Rep. 474 ; Servanti v. Lusk, 43 Cal. 238 . … Giovanni v. First National Bank, 55 Ala. 305 ; Bonsall v. Comly, 44 Pa. St. 442; Guptil v. McFee, 9 Kas. 30 ; Baker v. Sheehan, 29 Minn. 235 ; Prosser v. Hartley, 35 id. 340 ; State v. Bowden, 18 Fla. 17 ; State v.

Walker v. Killoren Electric Co.

243 Ark. 752 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 18, 1967

Lyle BrowN, Justice. Appellant (plaintiff below) brought this action to vacate a judgment rendered in his favor in 1950, at which time he was a minor. … Woodall v. Moore, 55 Ark. 22 , 17 S. W. 268 (1891). Further, this statement from Woodall was reiterated in Selig v. Barnett, 233 Ark. 900 , 350 S.

Gregory v. National Life & Insurance

250 Ark. 770 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 24, 1971

Lyle Brown, Justice. Appellant Bertha Gregory was the plaintiff below and appeals from a summary judgment in appellee’s favor. … Mutual of Omaha v. George, 245 Ark. 670 , 434 S. W. 2d 307 (1968).

South County, Inc. v. First Western Loan Co.

311 Ark. 501 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 19, 1993

Smith v. Leonard, 310 Ark. 782 , 840 S.W.2d 167 (1992). In Fratesi v. … See Arkhola Sand & Gravel Co. v. Hutchinson, 291 Ark. 570 , 726 S.W.2d 674 (1987).

Laughlin v. State

316 Ark. 489 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 28, 1994

Brown, Justice. This case involves multiple convictions of rape and sexual abuse involving boys less than age 14. The appellant, Christopher Laughlin, received seven sentences, two of which were life terms. … Brown v. State, 309 Ark. 503 , 832 S.W.2d 477 (1992). Moore v. State, 315 Ark. 131, 134 , 864 S.W.2d 863, 865 (1993).

Arthur v. Zearley

320 Ark. 273 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 10, 1995

In Harrigan v. … This decision was cited by the California Court of Appeal in Brown v. Regents of University of California, 151 Cal. App.3d 982 , 198 Cal.

Dickinson v. Arkansas City Improvement Co.

77 Ark. 570 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 10, 1906

Crease v. Lawrence, supra; Hankins v. Layne, 48 Ark. 544 ; Apperson v. Burgett, 33 Ark. 328 ; Conger v. Cotton, 37 Ark. 286 ; Bonner v. Little, 38 Ark. 397 . … Bayard v. Hargrove, 45 Ga. 342 ; Board of Education v. Edson, 18 Ohio St. 221 ; Campbell v. Kansas City, 102 Mo. 326 ; Board Com’rs Mahoning County v. Young, 59 Fed. 96 ; State v. Travis County, 85 Tex. 435 .

Caldwell v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.

137 Ark. 439 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 3, 1919

The witness explained that the crew did not work regularly at one place but that they went from place to place, and when working out of Little Bock were supplied with boarding cars in which the crew lived. … Co. v. Bryant, 92 Ark. 425 .

Chrisman v. Carney

33 Ark. 316 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 15, 1878

(See the cases of Lemay v. Williams, p. 166; Akin v. Newell, p. 605; Lavender v. Hodgens, p. 763.) With regard to the first issue, if the arrest was unlawful, no malice need be shown. … A sheriff cannot execute a process outside of his own county, as held in this court in Blevins v. State, 31 Ark., 153.