Case law

Gifford v. Estate of Gifford

305 Ark. 46 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 18, 1991

Mangum v. Estate of Fuller, 303 Ark. 411 , 797 S.W.2d 452 (1990). In the interpretation of wills the cardinal principle is that the intention of the testatrix governs. In re Estate of Conover v. … Holt, C.J., and Brown, J., not participating.

Connor v. Ricks, Mayor

212 Ark. 833 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 2, 1948

The city council selected the civil service commissioners, and duly approved the rules and regulations of the board of civil service commissioners of such city. … So, we leave undecided any question as to Callahan’s eligibility for appointment by the Hot Springs civil service board.

Winkle v. State

310 Ark. 713 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 2, 1992

HAYS, GLAZE and BROWN, JJ., dissent. GLAZE, Justice, dissenting. To reverse this case borders on the absurd. Clearly, Mr. … HAYS and BROWN, JJ., join this dissent. BROWN, Justice, dissenting. I join Justice Glaze's dissent and add one observation.

Cribbs v. Walker

74 Ark. 104 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 28, 1905

Apperson v. Ford, 23 Ark. 746 ; McGaughey v. Brown, 46 Ark. 25 ; 3 Pom. Eq. Jur. § 1399; Kennedy v. Northup, 15 Ill. 149 ; Redmond v. Packenham, 66 Ill. 434 ; Booth v. Wiley, 102 Ill. 84 ; Pier v. … In McGaughey v. Brown, supra, Chief Justice Cockrill, said: “There is no mistaking the object of the bill.

Unborn Child Amendment Committee v. Ward

318 Ark. 165 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 3, 1994

Little Rock Family Planning Services et al. v. Thomas Dalton et al., 1994 W.L. 386796 at 14 (E.D. Ark.). … State v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co., 162 Ark. 443, 451 , 258 S.W. 609, 611 (1924).

Pratt v. Ballman-Cummings Furniture Co.

261 Ark. 396 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 4, 1977

In Rath v. … Kurtz v. Humboldt Trust & Savings Bank, 231 Iowa 1347 , 4 N.W. 2d 363 . See also Gibson v. American Railway Express Co., 195 Iowa 1126, 1132 , 193 N.W. 274 ; Metropolitan Edison Co. v.

Colegrove v. Colegrove

89 Ark. 182 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 1, 1909

In Tillar v. … Crittenden v. Woodruff, 11 Ark. 82 ; Trapnall v. Brown, 19 Ark. 39 ; Johnson v. Richardson, 44 Ark. 365 ; Richardson v. Taylor, 45 Ark. 472 ; Robinson v. Robinson, 45 Ark. 481 ; Crow v. Watkins, 48 Ark. 169 ; Camden v.

Flemens v. Harris

319 Ark. 659 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 27, 1995

Brown, Justice. The appellants in this case, Roger D. Flemens and Nancy Flemens, appeal an order granting summary judgment to appellee Glen D. … Cortese v. Atlantic Richfield, 317 Ark. 207 , 876 S.W.2d 581 (1994); Martin v. National Bank of Commerce, 316 Ark. 83 , 870 S.W.2d 738 (1994). In Cortese v.

Henderson v. Skerczak

247 Ark. 446 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 27, 1969

Lyle Brown, Justice. Skerczak sued Henderson for personal injuries arising out of a vehicular collision. The jury found in Henderson’s favor. … Big Rock Stone & Material Co. v. Hoffman, 233 Ark. 342 , 344 S. W. 2d 585 (1961); Ellsworth Brothers Truck Lines v. Mayes, 246 Ark. 441 , 438 S. W. 2d 724 (1969). Reversed.

Bergman v. Sells & Co.

39 Ark. 97 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 15, 1882

Merrick & Fenno v. Hutt, 15, Ark., 343; Lamb v. Belden, 16 ib., 539; Frellson v. Green, ad., 19 ib., 376. … Desha v. Baker, 3 Ark., 509; Watkins v. Field, 6 ib., 391; Martin et al. v. Foreman, 18 ib., 251.

Watson v. Barnett

191 Ark. 990 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 16, 1935

Crow v. Security Mortgage Co., 176 Ark. 1130 , 5 S. W. (2d) 346 . … See Dickinson v. Mingea, ante p. 946; Drainage District No. 2 of Crittenden County v. Mercantile-Commerce Bank & Trust Co., 69 Fed. (2d) 138; Myers v. Rolfe, 71 Ark. 215 , 72 S. W. 52 .

Thompson v. Bowen

87 Ark. 490 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 12, 1908

Thompson” can only be regarded as descriptive of the person, and not as limiting the estate taken under the patent. 13 Cyc. 625; Jackson v. Roberts, 95 Ky. 410 ; Richardson v. McLemore, 60 Miss. 315 ; Barrett v. … C. 29; Brown v. Combs, 29 N. J. L. 36; Hart v. Seymour, 147 Ill. 598 ; Kanenbly v. Volkenberg, 75 N. Y. Supp. 8 . Decree affirmed.

Bank of Monette v. Hale

104 Ark. 388 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 10, 1912

Hogg v. Thurman, 90 Ark. 97 . In Bothell v. … Evatt v. Hudson, 97 Ark. 268 ; Jaratt v. Langston, 99 Ark. 438 ; Brown v. LeMay, 101 Ark. 95 .

Cain v. Cain

145 Ark. 224 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 4, 1920

Hence the case' is well within the rule announced in Rose v. Rose, supra, and subsequent cases. See Kurtz v. Kurtz, 38 Ark. 119 ; Brown v. Brown, 38 Ark. 323 ; Haley v. Haley, 44 Ark. 428 ; Malone v. … Malone, 76 Ark. 28 ; Keintz v. Keintz, 104 Ark. 303 ; Bell v. Bell, 105 Ark. 196 ; Dunn v. Dunn, 114 Ark. 516 . The decree, is therefore in all things affirmed. .

Sullivan v. Winters

91 Ark. 149 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 21, 1909

McClintock v. Thweatt, 71 Ark. 323 ; Trowbridge v. Weatherbee, 11 Allen 361 ; Linscott v. McIntire, 15 Me. 201 ; Hess v. Fox, 10 Wend. 436 ; Bunnel v. Taintor, 4 Conn. 568 ; Bruce v. Hastings, 41 Vt. 380 ; Benjamin v. … Browne on the Statute of Frauds, § § 273, 274; Linscott v. McIntire, supra; Trowbridge v. Weatherbee, supra; Peters v. Westborough, 19 Pick. 364 ; Lyon v.

Trujillo v. State

483 S.W.3d 801 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 11, 2016

Martin v. Kohls, 2014 Ark. 427, at 15 , 444 S.W.3d 844, 852 (quoting Bailey v. Abington, 201 Ark. 1072, 1078 , 148 S.W.2d 176, 180 (1941)). … (citing Regina v.

Baker v. Ellis

245 Ark. 484 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 28, 1968

Lyle Brown, Justice. Appellants were plaintiffs below. They brought suit alleging a four-sixths interest in four lots in Little Rock and contended that their uncle, Eugene Ellis, owned the other two-sixths interest. … Teaver v. Akin, 47 Ark. 528 , 1 S.W. 772 (1886). Our record is void of evidence that any instrument of writing ever existed.

Baker v. Harris

178 Ark. 1001 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 28, 1929

The only constitutional or statutory inhibition is that officers in either the army or national guard cannot be removed from office without a trial, either before a court-martial or an efficiency board. … In the case of Grove v. Mott, 46 N. J. Law 328, 50 Am.

Dillard v. Resolution Trust Corp.

308 Ark. 357 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 17, 1992

Carmichael v. Nationwide Life Ins., 305 Ark. 549 , 810 S.W.2d 39 (1991); Anderson v. First Nat’l Bank, 304 Ark. 164 , 801 S.W.2d 273 (1990). … Brown, J., not participating.

Johnson v. State

326 Ark. 3 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 23, 1996

See Brown v. State, 316 Ark. 724 , 875 S.W.2d 828 (1994). Appellant first argues that scissors are not a deadly weapon. … See e.g., McLendon v.