Case law

Cain v. Cain

145 Ark. 224 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 4, 1920

Hence the case' is well within the rule announced in Rose v. Rose, supra, and subsequent cases. See Kurtz v. Kurtz, 38 Ark. 119 ; Brown v. Brown, 38 Ark. 323 ; Haley v. Haley, 44 Ark. 428 ; Malone v. … Malone, 76 Ark. 28 ; Keintz v. Keintz, 104 Ark. 303 ; Bell v. Bell, 105 Ark. 196 ; Dunn v. Dunn, 114 Ark. 516 . The decree, is therefore in all things affirmed. .

Reed v. State

375 Ark. 277 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 19, 2008

Brown, Justice. Appellant Roy Reed has filed this pro se appeal from the circuit judge’s denial of his petition for postconviction relief, which was lodged pursuant to Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 37.1. … See, e.g., Scott v. State, 351 Ark. 619 , 96 S.W.3d 732 (2003); Bilyeu v. State, 337 Ark. 304 , 987 S.W.2d 277 (1999); Williams v. State, 272 Ark. 98 , 612 S.W.2d 115 (1981).

Powell v. Hayes

176 Ark. 660 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 19, 1928

Brown v. Nelms, 86 Ark. 368 , 112 S. W. 373 . In the alleged will under consideration in this case the testator gave the balance of his property to his wife and heirs, as the law provides. … Turman v. White, 14 B. Mon. (Ky.) 450; and Feltman v. Butts (Ky.), 8 Bush. 115. The holding of this court is in accordance with this rule. Robinson v. Bishop, 23 Ark. 378 , and Galloway v. Darby, 105 Ark. 558 , 151 S.

Henry v. Landreth

254 Ark. 483 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 14, 1973

Co. v. … Saliba v. Saliba, 178 Ark. 250 , 11 S.W. 2d 774 (1928), Jones v. Brown, et al, Trustees, 242 Ark. 537 , 414 S.W. 2d 618 (1967).

Clark v. Lesser

106 Ark. 207 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 20, 1913

In Hill v. … As we said in Hoye v.

Clayton v. State

321 Ark. 217 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 26, 1995

Brown, Justice. This is an appeal by appellant Douglas James Clayton from a judgment of conviction for first degree murder, attempted first degree murder, and aggravated assault. … As we first decided in Standridge v.

Ulmer v. State

253 Ark. 106 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 25, 1972

The trial court erred in allowing, in rebuttal Testimony by Deputy Sheriff Comer Johnson and Chief Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Robert Brown, references to prior statements by defense witness Evonne Smith without the introduction … House v. State, 230 Ark. 622 , 324 S.W. 2d 112 ; Weldon v. State, 168 Ark. 534 , 270 S.W. 968 . See also, Walker v. State, 241 Ark. 300 , 408 S.W. 2d 905 , appeal dismissed, cert. denied, 386 U.S. 682 , 87 S.

Fountain v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry.

243 Ark. 947 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 22, 1968

Lyle Brown, Justice. This is a wrongful death case brought by appellant, Martha Fountain, Administratrix of the Estate of Johnnie 0. Thompson, deceased. … Jenkins, Admr. v. Midland Valley R. R., 134 Ark. 1 , 203 S. W. 1 (1918). We next consider that point of the administratrix which, in substance, asks us to overrule, in part, Peugh v. Oliger, Admx., 233 Ark. 281 , 345 S.

Person v. Cogbill

180 Ark. 664 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 16, 1929

Co. v. Nichol, 170 Ark. 791 , 281 S. W. 21 ; Belleclair Planting Co. v. Hall, 125 Ark. 203 , 188 S. W. 574 . … Co. v. Nichol, supra.

Peters v. State

286 Ark. 421 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 8, 1985

Baldasaar v. Illinois, 446 U.S. 222 (1980); Lovell v. State, 283 Ark. 425 , 678 S.W.2d 318 (1984). … In State v. Brown, 283 Ark. 304 , 675 S.W.2d 822 (1984), we allowed the state to amend an information to charge DWI, first offense, instead of DWI, fourth offense.

Rogers v. Galloway Female College

39 L.R.A. 636 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 22, 1898

and himself, who were on the board, signed it. … Pipkin, President of Board, A. W. Yarnell, G. B. Greer, of Board.” Pipkin says that he never thought of this being considered a release of Greer on his subscription for $2,500; that it was not so intended.

Velvet Ridge School District No. 91 v. Bank of Searcy

200 Ark. 85 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 11, 1940

Leslie Fritts, secretary to the school board, who wrote the warrant, testified positively that the change was made after it left his hands. The president of the school board, D. L. Johnston, corroborated Mr. Fritts. … Charleston Paint Co. v. Exchange Banking & T. Co., 129 S. C. 290, 123 S. E. 830 .” In Arnold v. Wood, 127 Ark. 234 , 191 S.

Holt v. State

171 Ark. 279 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 31, 1926

Carpenter v. State, 62 Ark. 286 , and Latourette v. State, 91 Ark. 65 . … Brown v.

Hensley v. Farm Bureau Mutual Ins. Co. of Arkansas

243 Ark. 408 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 6, 1967

Co. v. Hodges, 275 Ala. 243 , 154 So. 2d 3 ; American Century Ins. Co. v. Harrison, (Texas Civ. App.) 205 S. … In the Wisconsin case of Ciokewicz v. Lynn Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 248 N.

Pickens v. State

279 Ark. 457 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 20, 1983

Adams v. State, 276 Ark. 18 , 631 S.W.2d 828 (1982); see also, Perry v. State, 277 Ark. 357 , 642 S.W.2d 865 (1982); and Wright v. State, 267 Ark. 264 , 590 S.W.2d 15 (1979). We find no abuse of discretion here. … Brown v. State, 278 Ark. 604 , 648 S. W.2d 67 (1983); and Smith v. State, 277 Ark. 64 , 639 S.W.2d 348 (1982). Affirmed.

Estes v. State

180 Ark. 656 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 16, 1929

Brown v. State, 168 Ark. 433 , 270 S. W. 537 .

Eason v. Erwin

300 Ark. 384 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 6, 1989

State v. Board of Directors of School Dist. of Ashdown, 122 Ark. 337 , 183 S.W. 747 (1916). It will not lie to control or review matters of judicial discretion, but only to compel the exercise of such discretion. … Rolfe v. Spybuck Drainage Dist. No. 1, 101 Ark. 29 , 140 S.W. 988 (1911). Essentially, a trial judge controls his docket and the disposition of motions filed.

Doe v. Baum

348 Ark. 259 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 18, 2002

Pursuant to the authorization of this statute, ADE opted to establish the School Employee — School Board Protection Program (“Program”).* 2 3 We interpreted the scope of Ark. Code Ann. § 6-17-1113 in Waire v. … School Employee — School Board Protection Program, at 1-4. 4 Ark.

Graff v. Lena Lumber Co.

96 Ark. 350 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 31, 1910

Graff, the senior member thereof, was and is the president of said board of directors of said district. That the said J. N. … Powers v. Phelps, 33 Ark. 468 ; Danly v. Rector, 10 Ark. 211 ; Trapnall v. Burton, 24 Ark. 371 ; Gill v. Hardin, 48 Ark. 409 . Decree affirmed.

First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Stacha

285 Ark. 372 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 15, 1985

The chancellor, considering the federal statutes not to be applicable, refused to allow the acceleration of maturities, in accord with our holding in Tucker v. Pulaski Fed. … That report reads in part: The United States Supreme Court, in Fidelity Federal Savings and Loan Association v.