Case law

Anthony v. State

332 Ark. 595 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 16, 1998

In Harrison v. … Gibson v. State, 316 Ark. 705 , 875 S.W.2d 58 (1994). Furthermore, a party is bound on appeal by the scope and nature of the objections and arguments presented at trial. Brown v.

Caton v. Western Clay Drainage District

87 Ark. 8 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 29, 1908

The next objection is that the act delegates judicial power to the board of directors, and that the judicial power of the State is vested in the courts in art. 7 of the Constitution. … Carson v. St. Francis Levee District, 59 Ark. 513 ; Coffman v. St. Francis Drainage Dist., 83 Ark. 54 ; Sudberry v. Graves, 83 Ark. 344 ; Craig v. Russellville Waterworks Imp. Dist., 84 Ark. 390 ; Road Imp. Dist. v.

Settle v. Meyers

251 Ark. 532 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 6, 1971

Lyle Brown, Justice. This is a child custody case. Custody having previously been awarded the appelleefather, the appellant-mother filed her petition alleging a change in circumstances. … McDaniel v. McDaniel, 224 Ark. 371 , 273 S. W. 2d 406 (1954). Custody is granted the mother subject to the right which we vest in the father to have the child visit him during week-ends. Reversed and remanded.

St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. Conarty

106 Ark. 421 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 3, 1913

The other two men stepped off the foot-board after they discovered the car in front, but deceased remained in his position on the foot-board, and the car, on account of the missing draw-bar, coupling and draw-head, came in … Co. v. Taylor, 210 U. S. 281 ; C., B & Q. Ry. Co. v. United States, 220 U. S. 559 ; Delk v. St. Louis & San Francisco Rd. Co., 220 U. S. 580 .

Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. Mills

371 Ark. 317 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 25, 2007

Bogard, supra; Tortorich v. Tortorich, supra; Ark. Game & Fish Comm’n v. Lindsey, supra; Dean v. Cole, supra; and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Bd. v. Newton, supra. … Game & Fish Comm’n v. Harkey, supra; Willis v. Circuit Court of Phillips Cty., supra; Downey v. Toler, supra; Forrest City Machine Works v. Colvin, supra.

Tyler v. Shackleford

303 Ark. 662 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 19, 1990

See State v. Craighead County Board of Election Commissioners, 300 Ark. 405 , 779 S.W.2d 169 (1989). … See State v. Craighead County Board of Election Commissioners; Ridgeway v. Catlett, 238 Ark. 232 , 379 S.W.2d 277 (1964); Irby v. Barrett, 204 Ark. 682 , 163 S.W.2d 512 (1942).

McAllister v. Forrest City Street Improvement District No. 11

274 Ark. 372 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 14, 1981

Little Rock v. Katzenstein, supra. Furthermore, we stated in Freeze v. Improvement Dist. … Ann § 20-401 provides: As soon as said board of improvement shall have formed said plan, and shall have ascertained the cost of the improvement, it shall report the same to the city or town council, which shall appoint three

Grimmett v. State

251 Ark. 270 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 21, 1972

In State v. … In State ex rel Streit v.

Guile v. Snyder

165 Ark. 221 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 7, 1924

He was sitting on the running board of a ear which was ■parked on the side of the road, and he was oblivious to any danger until he was struck. … L., page 138; Johnson v. Bullard Co., 12 A. L. R. 766; Huddy on Automobiles (6th ed.) § 339, p. 402.

Oliver v. Henry Quellmalz Lumber & Manufacturing Co.

170 Ark. 1029 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 19, 1926

Ward v. McPherson, 87 Ark. 521 , and Nedry v. Vaile, 109 Ark. 584 , and cases cited. … Co. v. Coosa Furnace Co., 95 Ala. 614 , 10 So. 290 , 36 Am. St. Rep. 251 ; Swentzel v. Franklin Inv. Co., 168 Mo. 272 , 67 S. W. 596 ; Crymble v. Mulvaney, 21 Colo. 203 , 40 Pac. 499 ; Barr v.

Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Waddy

253 Ark. 473 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 27, 1972

Weingarten, Inc. v. … Some of it was brown colored, or yellow, and appeared wilted. It looked as if it had been there for some time. Here, as in Weingarten, the defendant’s proof failed to overcome the plaintiff’s prima facie case. C. H.

McNeil v. Weiss

378 S.W.3d 133 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 9, 2011

BROWN, Justice. | Appellant Minor Lee McNeil petitioned for a writ of mandamus concerning over-payments of state income taxes made to the Arkansas Department of Finance and Administration (DFA). … See Widmer v.

Pine Bluff v. Mead

177 Ark. 809 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 2, 1928

Vestal v. Little Rock, 54 Ark. 328 , 15 S. W. 891 , 11 L. R. A. 778. … Brown v. Peach Orchard, 162 Ark. 175 , 257 S. W. 732 . There was testimony that a forty-acre tract of land owned by W. M.

Festinger v. Kantor

264 Ark. 275 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 2, 1978

Other cases illustrating non-final orders vesting the title to land include Sennett v. Walker, 92 Ark. 607 , 123 S.W. 769 (1909), and Brown v. Nowell, 88 Ark. 590 , 115 S.W. 372 (1909). … The correct appellate procedure was followed in Hargus v.

Person v. Cogbill

180 Ark. 664 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 16, 1929

Co. v. Nichol, 170 Ark. 791 , 281 S. W. 21 ; Belleclair Planting Co. v. Hall, 125 Ark. 203 , 188 S. W. 574 . … Co. v. Nichol, supra.

Ferguson v. State Bank

3 Ark. 416 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 15, 1848

The point presented upon these pleas was fully discussed and definitively settled by this court in the case of Underhill v. The State Bank, 1 Eng. Rep. p. 138: and in Murphy v. The Same, 2 Eng. Rep. p. 58. … This court in the cases of Hempstead and Conway v. Watkins, adm’r of Byrd, when discussing this point, used the following language, to wit: “The leading case upon this subject is Rees v.

Crider v. Simmons

192 Ark. 1075 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 6, 1936

McGaughey v. Brown, 46 Ark. 25 . In the instant case the sale was made for an inadequate price to the attorney who had prepared the petition for sale of the property. … McGaughey v. Brown, supra. Therefore, the proceeds of the insurance policy due the estate should be paid to the administrator to be distributed by Mm in accordance with the law.

Missouri Pac. R.R. Co., Thompson v. Holmes

197 Ark. 576 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 23, 1939

Armour & Co. v. Rose, 183 Ark. 413 , 36 S. W. 2d 70 ; Arkansas Short Line v. Bellars, 176 Ark. 53 , 2 S. W. 2d 683 . … Co. v.

Porter v. Hesselbein

235 Ark. 379 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 17, 1962

They are Kays v. Boyd, 145 Ark. 303 at 305 , 224 S. W. 617 , and Cecil v. Cline, opinion delivered March 5, 1962. … The court therefore found that a decision of the case could have no practical application to the controversy between the litigants, and dismissed the appeal of the Board of Trustees. Cecil v.

Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Nuckols

182 Ark. 17 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 9, 1930

Carter v. Brown, 136 Ark. 32 , 206 S. W. 71 ; Itzkowitz v. Ruebel, 158 Ark. 460 , 250 S. W. 535 ; Graves v. Jewell Tea Co., 180 Ark. 980 , 23 S. W. (2d) 974 . … In Railway v.