Case law

Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. Mills

371 Ark. 317 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 25, 2007

Bogard, supra; Tortorich v. Tortorich, supra; Ark. Game & Fish Comm’n v. Lindsey, supra; Dean v. Cole, supra; and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Bd. v. Newton, supra. … Game & Fish Comm’n v. Harkey, supra; Willis v. Circuit Court of Phillips Cty., supra; Downey v. Toler, supra; Forrest City Machine Works v. Colvin, supra.

McAllister v. Forrest City Street Improvement District No. 11

274 Ark. 372 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 14, 1981

Little Rock v. Katzenstein, supra. Furthermore, we stated in Freeze v. Improvement Dist. … Ann § 20-401 provides: As soon as said board of improvement shall have formed said plan, and shall have ascertained the cost of the improvement, it shall report the same to the city or town council, which shall appoint three

Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Waddy

253 Ark. 473 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 27, 1972

Weingarten, Inc. v. … Some of it was brown colored, or yellow, and appeared wilted. It looked as if it had been there for some time. Here, as in Weingarten, the defendant’s proof failed to overcome the plaintiff’s prima facie case. C. H.

Turpin v. Antonio

153 Ark. 377 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 15, 1922

Appellant, who was the plaintiff below, filed a complaint containing substantially the following allegations: that on June 10, 1919, defendant Antonio, as lessor, executed to one Peter Brown a lease for the term of four and … See also Satchfield v. Laconia Levee Dist., 74 Ark. 270 ; Odell & Kleiner v. Heinrich, 143 Ark. 435 ; Craig v. Frauenthal, 145 Ark. 185 . Judgment affirmed.

First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Stacha

285 Ark. 372 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 15, 1985

The chancellor, considering the federal statutes not to be applicable, refused to allow the acceleration of maturities, in accord with our holding in Tucker v. Pulaski Fed. … That report reads in part: The United States Supreme Court, in Fidelity Federal Savings and Loan Association v.

Temple v. Hamilton

178 Ark. 355 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 19, 1928

Smith v. Mack, 105 Ark. 653 , 151 S. W. 431 ; and Cammack v. Runyan Creamery, 175 Ark. 601 , 299 S. W. 1023 . … Garvin v. Linton, 62 Ark. 370 , 35 S. W. 430 , 37 S. W. 569 ; Tompkins v. Vaught, 138 Ark. 262 , 211 S. W. 361 ; and Hinton v. Brown, 174 Ark. 1025 , 298 S. W. 198 .

Turner v. West Memphis Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

266 Ark. 530 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 24, 1979

The matter of whether a notice to rescind is timely was treated in Ljepava v. M.L.S.C. Properties, Inc., 511 F. 2d 935 (9th Cir.1975). … See also Sosa v. Fite, 498 F. 2d 114 (5th Cir.1974). There was a timely rescission in French v. Wilson, 446 F.

Caton v. Western Clay Drainage District

87 Ark. 8 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 29, 1908

The next objection is that the act delegates judicial power to the board of directors, and that the judicial power of the State is vested in the courts in art. 7 of the Constitution. … Carson v. St. Francis Levee District, 59 Ark. 513 ; Coffman v. St. Francis Drainage Dist., 83 Ark. 54 ; Sudberry v. Graves, 83 Ark. 344 ; Craig v. Russellville Waterworks Imp. Dist., 84 Ark. 390 ; Road Imp. Dist. v.

Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Nuckols

182 Ark. 17 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 9, 1930

Carter v. Brown, 136 Ark. 32 , 206 S. W. 71 ; Itzkowitz v. Ruebel, 158 Ark. 460 , 250 S. W. 535 ; Graves v. Jewell Tea Co., 180 Ark. 980 , 23 S. W. (2d) 974 . … In Railway v.

Smith v. State

279 Ark. 68 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 11, 1983

Ann. § 28-1001, Rule 801 (Repl. 1979); Patterson v. State, 267 Ark. 436 , 591 S. W.2d 356 (1979); and Brown v. State, 262 Ark. 298 , 556 S. W.2d 418 (1977). … Cotton v. State, 276 Ark. 282 , 634 S.W.2d 127 (1982). Here, these photographs were relevant and helpful to the jury in understanding the testimony of the witnesses.

Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. Cook

100 Ark. 467 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 23, 1911

Houston v. Moore, 5 Wheaton 1 ; Gaines v. Fuentes, 92 U. S. 10 ; Insurance Company v. Pechner, 95 U. S. 185 ; Amory v. Amory, 95 U. S. 187 ; Gold-Washing & Water Co. v. Keyes, 96 U. S. 201 . … He testified that it was his duty, as swing brakeman, on leaving a station to see that the rear brakeman boarded the train before he boarded it himself, and that as the train left Ogden he waited to see the rear brakeman

Federal Compress & Warehouse Co. v. Jones

180 Ark. 476 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 25, 1929

Appellee recovered a judgment of $1,500 against appellant, upon the theory that appellant’s employee was sent to the Board of Commerce Building', in Little Bock, to get sacks of cotton belonging to. … A. 366; Robinson v. St. L. I. M. & S. Ry. Co., 111 Ark, 208, 163 S. W. 500 ; and Campbell Baking Co. v. Clark, 175 Ark. 899 , 1 S. W. (2d) 35 .

Hall v. Freeman

327 Ark. 720 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 24, 1997

Brown, Justice, dissenting. … See Hall v. Freeman, 327 Ark. 148 , 936 S.W.2d 761 (1997). (Brown, J., dissenting).

Holton v. Cook

181 Ark. 806 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 19, 1930

There is cited under this section, Stewart v. Loring, 5 Allen (Mass.) 306, 81 Am. Dec. 747 . … See Arlington Hotel Co. v. Rector, 124 Ark. 90 , 186 S. W. 622 ; 24 R. C. L. 630; 6 R. C. L. 1012.

Dickson v. Wolfe

235 Ark. 855 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 10, 1962

A preponderance of the evidence alone is not sufficient to reform a written instrument (Hicks v. Rankin, 214 Ark. 77 ). … As was said in Bevens v. Brown, 196 Ark. 1177 , 120 S. W. 2d 574 : ‘It must be so clear that reasonable minds will have no doubt that such an agreement was executed.

C.C.B. v. Arkansas Department of Health & Human Services

368 Ark. 540 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 25, 2007

He further argues that the Court’s opinions in Ward v. Village of Monroeville, 409 U.S. 57 (1972), and Tumey v. … See Perroni v. State, 358 Ark. 17 , 186 S.W.3d 206 (2004); Stivers v. State, 354 Ark. 140 , 118 S.W.3d 558 (2003); Ridling v. State, 348 Ark. 213 , 72 S.W.3d 466 (2002); Ramaker v.

Pledger v. Illinois Tool Works, Inc.

306 Ark. 134 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 24, 1991

Franchise Tax Board, 463 U.S. 159 (1983). … We note the appellant’s suggestion that the Supreme Court backed off of its ASARCO holding in its most recent case, Container Corp. v. Franchise Tax Board, 463 U.S. 159 (1983).

Jones v. Goodbar

60 Ark. 182 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 12, 1895

Freeman on Ex. (2 ed.), sec. 43 and authorities cited in note; Doe v. Rue, 29 Am. Dec. 368 ; Avery v. Bowman, 77 Am. Dec. 728 ; Parmelee v. Hitchcock, 12 Wend. 96 ; Hunt v. Loucks, 38 Cal. 372 , S. C. 99 Am. Dec. 464 . … State v. Melton, 8 Mo. 417 ; Nelson v. Brown, 23 Mo. 13 ; Beall v. Shattuck, 53 Miss. 361 ; Freeman on Ex. (2 ed.), sec. 353.

Arkansas State Highway Comm'n v. Humble Oil Co.

248 Ark. 685 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 11, 1970

State Highway Commn. v. Fox, 230 Ark. 287 , 322 S. … Burton v. Ward, 218 Ark. 253 , 236 S. W. 2d 65 (1951). Affirmed. Brown, J., not participating. Byrd, J., concurs.

Booth v. Baer

263 Ark. 213 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 3, 1978

. § 19-1603 (Repl. 1968 and Supp. 1971), provides: “The Board of Civil Service Commissioners herein provided shall prescribe, amend and enforce rules and regulations governing the fire and police departments of their respective … See also Stoor v. Seattle, 44 Wash. 2d 405 , 267 P. 2d 902 (1954). In Almassy v.