Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersark

10,000+ results

0.84s

  • Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Smith

    115 Ark. 473 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 7, 1914

    Co. v. Caraway, 77 Art. 405; St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. Dupree, 84 Ark. 377 ; St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. Sharp, 115 Ark. 308 . … Ry. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Sloan v. Newman

    166 Ark. 259 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 3, 1924

    Mason v. Bowen, 122 Ark. 407 . … Campbell, 49 Ark. 361 ; Taylor v. McClintock, 87 Ark. 243 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Robinson v. Buie

    307 Ark. 112 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 28, 1991

    Spears v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Ins., 291 Ark. 465 , 725 S.W.2d 835 (1987). … See Brown v. Kennedy Well Works, 302 Ark. 213 , 788 S.W.2d 948 (1990). Throughout the first lawsuit, Buie filed pleadings on Advanced Head Service’s behalf but signed the pleadings, “Charles Buie, pro se.”

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Fairbank v. Douglas

    188 Ark. 224 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 27, 1933

    Dist. v. Pickens, 169 Ark. 603 , 276 S. … The case of Cabell v. Board of Improvement, 124 Ark. 278 , 187 S. W. 666 , appears to me to require that action. I am authorized to say that Justices Mehaffy and McHaney concur in the views here expressed.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Mason v. Bowen

    122 Ark. 407 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 14, 1916

    See Payne v. Payne, 54 Ark. 415 . (4) 'Counsel for contestants offered to prove by Ben Mason, a brother of L. W. Mason, that L. W. Mason, before he went to board 'with J. B. R. … In the case of Taylor v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Davis v. Mabry

    266 Ark. 487 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 17, 1979

    Allen Frank Davis filed his petition for declaratory judgment and mandamus to the Director of the Arkansas Department of Corrections and the members of the Arkansas Parole Board. … State ex rel Woodward v. Board of Parole, 155 La. 699 , 99 So. 534 (1924).

    Overruled on other grounds by Bosnick v. Lockhart, 283 Ark. 206 (1984)Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Meek v. Christian

    168 Ark. 313 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 23, 1925

    In Morgan Engineering Co. v. … Altheimer v. Board of Directors of Plum Bayou Levee District, 79 Ark. 229 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Miner v. State

    342 Ark. 283 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 12, 2000

    See Williams v. State, 328 Ark. 487 , 944 S.W.2d 822 (1997) (citing Allen v. State, 326 Ark. 541 , 932 S.W.2d 764 (1996)). … Brown and Imber, JJ., dissent. Robert L. Brown, Justice. A revocation hearing is not a trial.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Buckley v. Collins

    110 Ark. 479 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 15, 1913

    Co. v. Langley, 78 Ark. 207 ; see also Brown v. Higgins, 45 Ark. 456 ; Townsend v. Timmons, 44 Ark. 482 . Reversed and remanded with directions to reinstate the appeal from the justice court.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Boyington v. Van Etten

    62 Ark. 63 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 15, 1896

    Brown was vice-president, W. E. Boyington was president, and V. P. … Stout v. Zulick, 48 N. J. L. 599; Merrick v. Van Santvoord, 34 N. Y., 208 ; Saltmarsh v. Spaulding, 147 Mass. 224 ; Hanna v. Int. Petroleum Co. 23 Ohio St. 622 ; Second National Bank v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Hill v. Whitney

    213 Ark. 368 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 26, 1948

    On the board there were alternating, diagonal stripes of red and white making what was called a “scotch light barricade,” which could be seen several hundred feet. … Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Shipp, 174 Ark. 130 , 297 S. W. 856 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • McCoy v. State Use of Greene County

    190 Ark. 297 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 4, 1935

    Browning for clerical help $750; D. G. … Browning*, are each dated February 14, 1934, as is the one, given by D. G. Beauchamp, in the amount of $120.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Civil Service Commission of Van Buren v. Matlock

    205 Ark. 286 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 15, 1943

    In construing this provision of the constitution this court, in the case of Drew County Timber Company v. Board of Equalization, 124 Ark. 569 , 187 S. … State v. Johnson, 26 Ark. 281 ; Wheat v. Smith, 50 Ark. 266 , 7 S. W. 161 ; Wise v. Martin, 36 Ark. 305 ; Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. Conway County Bridge District, 134 Ark. 292 , 204 S. W. 630 .

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Fortenbury v. State

    47 Ark. 188 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 15, 1886

    Farcira v. Gabell, 89 Pa. St., 89; Thompson v. Cummings & Co., 68 Ga., 124 ; Flagg v. Baldwin, 38 N. J. … Rumsey v. Berry, 65 Me., 570; Melchert v. Am. Union Tel. Co., 3 McCrary, 521 ; Union Nat. Bank v. Carr, 5 Id., 71; Cobb v. Prell, Ib., 80; Gregory v. Wendell, 39 Mich., 337 ; Whitesides v. Hunt, 97 Ind., 191 ; S.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Dodd v. State

    94 Ark. 297 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 21, 1910

    Targe discretion is allowed the teacher and the board, within the statute, in determining what course of conduct on the part of pupils is necessary for the good of the whole school. That is the prime consideration. … State v. Pendergrass, 2 Dev. & Batt. 365; Hathaway v. Rice, 19 Vt. 102 ; Stevens v. Fassett, 27 Me. 266 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Powell v. Taylor

    222 Ark. 896 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 11, 1954

    Frederick v. Brown Funeral Homes, Inc., 222 La. 57 , 62 S. 2d 100. … In Fentress v. Sicard, 181 Ark. 173 , 25 S.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Jones v. State

    275 Ark. 12 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 25, 1982

    Prokos v. State, 266 Ark. 50 , 282 S.W.2d 36 (1939); Dolphus v. State, 256 Ark. 248 , 506 S.W.2d 538 (1974); and Whitley v. State, 140 Ark. 425 , 215 S.W. 703 (1919). … See Browning v. State, 274 Ark. 13 , 621 S.W.2d 688 (1981). Here, the appellant did notask for a bill of particulars, plead surprise nor seek a continuance when the court allowed the amendment of the information.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Glaze v. State

    385 S.W.3d 203 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 3, 2011

    BROWN, Justice, concurring. 114I concur with the decision of the majority. I write separately merely to call attention to the need for a study of our criminal code. … See Whiteside v. State, 2011 Ark. 371 , 383 S.W.3d 859 (alleged conflict between Title 5 and Title 16 concerning the jury’s right to determine punishment); Hervey v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • First American National Bank v. McClure Construction Co.

    265 Ark. 792 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 21, 1979

    Davidson v. Commercial Credit Equipment Corp., supra ; Hinton v. Brown, 174 Ark. 1025 , 298 S.W. 198 (1927). There is a distinction, although sometimes a fine one, between a mistake of fact and one of law. … Brooks v. Burgess, 228 Ark. 150 , 306 S.W.2d 104 (1957); Ford Motor Co. v. Catalan, 238 Ark. 561 , 383 S.W.2d 99 (1964). We found the requisite intent to make an unlawful charge in Cagle v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State v. Sherman

    303 Ark. 284 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 1, 1990

    Two recent opinions, Henagan v. … See Brown v. State, 290 Ark. 289 , 718 S.W.2d 937 (1986) (motion to withdraw guilty plea filed after sentencing may be treated as a Rule 37 petition). Even though Rule 37 was abolished in Whitmore v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.