Case law

Hodges v. Lawyers Co-operative Publishing Co.

111 Ark. 571 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 23, 1914

The entire authority of the board to let such contracts is conferred by statute, and the statute prescribes how only they can contract. … Any other contract is unauthorized, in excess of the powers vested in the board and voidable at the election of the State.”

Guaranty Financial Corp. v. Harden

244 Ark. 846 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 13, 1968

Lyle Brown, Justice. Our first appeal in this case, Guaranty Financial Corp. v. Harden, 242 Ark. 779 , 416 S. … Dearien v. Lancaster, 221 Ark. 98 , 252 S. W. 2d 72 (1952). From the contradictory evidence in the record here, we are nnable to say that the chancellor’s finding is contrary to the weight of the evidence. Affirmed.

Morris v. Torch Club, Inc.

295 Ark. 461 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 9, 1988

Whitmore v. State, 72 Ark. 14 , 77 S.W. 598 (1903); see Hunter v. State, 60 Ark. 312 , 30 S.W. 42, 44 (1895). … Typical of these cases is Tri-State Hotel v.

Campbell v. Little Rock School District

222 Ark. 615 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 16, 1953

In Board of Directors of Jefferson County Bridge District v. Collier, 104 Ark. 425 , 149 S. W. 66 , Judge McCulloch cited Road Improvement District v. Glover, 89 Ark. 513 , 117 S. … There is a fundamental difference between the situation with which we now deal and such cases as State v. Craighead, County, 1 Jackson County v. Nuckolls,2 Jackson County v. Pickens,3 Phillips County v.

Statham v. Brooke

140 Ark. 187 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 13, 1919

Outlaw v. Yell, Governor, 5 Ark. 468 ; Porter v. State, use of Brown, 9 Ark. 226 ; Gordon v. State, use Wallace, 11 Ark. 12 ; Norton v. State, 25 Ark. 46 ; Hall v. Brewer, 40 Ark. 433 ; George v. … Elms, 46 Ark. 260 ; State, use McCreary, v. Roth, 47 Ark. 222 ; Euper v. State, 85 Ark. 223 ; Ferguson v. Carr, 85 Ark. 246 ; Planters’ Mutual Insurance Assn. v. Harris, 96 Ark. 296 .

Taylor v. Bank of Mulberry

177 Ark. 1091 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 1, 1928

Taylor testifies, with reference to the purchase of the land from her nephew, that he owed her for four or five years ’ board; had been living with her for seventeen years, and he owed at least four years ’ board. … See Hayes v. Bishop, 141 Ark. 155 , 216 S. W. 298 ; Goodrum v. Merchants’ & Planters’ Bank, 102 Ark. 326 , 174 S. W. 198 , Ann. Cas. 1914A, 511.

Terry Dairy Products Company v. Cash

224 Ark. 576 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 7, 1955

275 S.W.2d 12 (1955) TERRY DAIRY PRODUCTS COMPANY, Inc., Appellant, v. Joe R. CASH, Commissioner of Labor, et al., Appellees. No. 5-588. Supreme Court of Arkansas. … It was certainly the Board's privilege to accept the view expressed by a doctor who had observed his patient over a period of years.

Street Improvement District No. 419 v. Lewis

216 Ark. 595 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 6, 1950

Section 3 excludes from the Board’s consideration “any real estate or parts or parcels of real estate which are delinquent at the time such refund is made.” … See Thibault v. McHaney, 119 Ark. 188 , 177 S. W. 877 . See Ark. Stats. (1947), § 20-317.

Hudgins v. Schultice

118 Ark. 139 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 5, 1915

Perkins v. Ogilvie, 131 S. W. (Ky.) 200. … Page v. Chase Co., 79 Pac. (Cal.) 278; Dow v.

Jackson v. Norris

378 S.W.3d 103 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 9, 2011

BROWN, Justice, concurring. I concur in the decision. … . § 5-4-104 (a) (Repl.1997); State v. Britt, 368 Ark. 273 , 244 S.W.3d 665 (2006).

Powell v. Taylor

222 Ark. 896 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 11, 1954

Frederick v. Brown Funeral Homes, Inc., 222 La. 57 , 62 S. 2d 100. … In Fentress v. Sicard, 181 Ark. 173 , 25 S.

Hill v. State

276 Ark. 300 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 7, 1982

In Davis v. … Lee v. State, 73 Ark. 148 , 83 S.W. 916 (1904). This is still the law. We do not reverse for non-prejudicial errors. Brown v. State, 262 Ark. 298 , 556 S.W.2d 418 (1977). Affirmed.

Fluty v. School District

49 Ark. 94 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 15, 1886

Dig., sec. 2999 ; Leonard v. City of Brooklyn, 71 N. Y., 498 ; S. C., 27 Amer. Rep., 80; Loring v. Small, 50 Iowa, 271 ; S. C., 32 Amer. Rep., 136; Charnock v. District Township of Colfax, 51 Iowa, 70 ; S. C., 33 Amer. … Rep., 116; Board of Education v. Neidenburger, 78 Ill., 58 ; Quinn v. Allen and the Board of School Directors, 85 Ill., 39 . But this matter of lien or no lien is unimportant in the present case.

Black v. State

215 Ark. 618 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 20, 1949

Another shoe was directly up in front of the floor board, and he found buttons on the floor board of the car, and a lady’s wrist watch on the right hand side of the car on the floor board in the back of the car. … Lowmack v. State, 178 Ark. 928 , 12 S. W. 2d 909 ; Shinn v. State, 150 Ark. 215 , 234 S. W. 636 ; Smith v. State, 74 Ark. 397 , 85 S. W. 1123 ; Younger v. State, 100 Ark. 321 , 140 S. W. 139 .

Holcomb v. State

268 Ark. 138 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 25, 1980

In Lang v. State, 258 Ark. 504 , 527 S.W. 2d 900 (1975) and Foots v. … and issued by the board.

Greenlee v. Munn

262 Ark. 663 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 16, 1978

We do not agree that it is under the test prescribed in our interpretation of Amendment 7 to the Arkansas Constitution in Scroggins v. Kerr, 217 Ark. 137 , 228 S.W. 2d 995 . … The board is vested and has for a long time been vested with the right, duty or status provided for by legislation by the General Assembly and by the enabling ordinance of Pine Bluff.

Missouri Pac. R.R. Co., Thompson, Trustee v. McGuire

205 Ark. 658 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 5, 1943

Board of Directors v. Barton, 92 Ark. 406 , 123 S. W. 382 , 25 L. R. A., N. S., 645, 135 Am. St. Rep. 191 ; Louisville, etc., Ry. Co. v. Jackson, 123 Ark. 1 , 184 S. W. 450 , Ann. Cas. 1918A, 604; St. Louis, etc., Ry. … This feature of the case is very similar to the case of Board of Directors, St. Francis Levee District, v. Barton, 92 Ark. 406 , 123 S. W. 382 , 25 L. R. A., N. S., 645, 135 Am. St. Rep. 191 .

Ballard v. Hunter

74 Ark. 174 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 11, 1905

This is an attack upon a sale of lands made by a commissioner in chancery pursuant to a decree foreclosing the lien of the Board of Directors of St. … Johnson v. Hunter, supra. 4.

May & Ellis Co. v. Farmers Union Mercantile Co.

120 Ark. 316 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 18, 1915

The facts of the case bring it very clearly within the decision of this court in Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Choctaw Mercantile Co., 80 Ark. 438 .

Cain v. McGregor

182 Ark. 633 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 10, 1930

Irby v. Day, ante, p. 595. … Such was the holding of the court in Brown v. Nisler, 179 Ark. 178 , 15 S. W. (2d) 314 .