Case law

St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Bailey

87 Ark. 132 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 6, 1908

agreed upon should be for board. … Co. v. Reaves, 82 Ark. 377 . The court in this case did not submit to the jury'the question as to whether plaintiff requested his money or check sent to any particular station.

Oliver v. Clifton

59 Ark. 187 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 26, 1894

Brown, and delivered possession to him, and that he sold and conveyed the same to W. L. Moose, who sold and conveyed the same to appellee, Clifton. … Daggett v. Ayer, 18 Atl. R. 169; Pierce v. Faunce, 47 Me. 507 ; Busby v. Littlefield, 31 N. H. 193; Haley v. Bagley, 37 Mo. 363 ; Durham v. Bischof, 47 Ind. 211 ; Hellman v. Schneider, 75 Ill. 423 .

Rollins v. State

347 S.W.3d 20 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 8, 2009

See Brown v. State, 374 Ark. 341 , 288 S.W.3d 226 (2008); Yarbrough v. State, 370 Ark. 31 , 257 S.W.3d 50 (2007). … In Hoyle, the State also offered the testimony of a board certified pathologist, Dr.

In re Ark. Rules of Civ. P. 11 & 42

2015 Ark. 88 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 26, 2015

The Supreme Court invalidated a portion of the statute in Summerville v. Thrower, 369 Ark. 231, 253 S.W.3d 415 (2007). … In Crockett & Brown v. Wilson, 321 Ark. 150, 901 S.W.2d 826 (1995), the Supreme Court held that an order imposing monetary sanctions under Rule 11 must explain the basis for the trial court’s decision.

Glover v. Russell

260 Ark. 609 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 8, 1976

Joel Anderson, as members of the Board of Election Commissioners of Pulaski County and Charles F. … Furthermore, the Precinct 180A by the minutes of the Board of Election Commissioners existed only for the 1974 election.

Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Campbell, Adm'r

200 Ark. 1056 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 17, 1940

Co. v. Gibson, 107 Ark. 431 , 155 S. W. 510 ; St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Crick, 182 Ark. 312 , 32 S. W. 2d 815 ; Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Cook, 187 Ark. 914 , 63 S. … Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. v. Ross, 194 Ark. 877 , 109 S. W. 2d 1246 ; Missouri Pacific Railroad, Co. v. Penny, ante, p. 69, 137 S. W. 2d 934 .

Stroud v. M. M. Barksdale Lumber Co.

229 Ark. 111 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 26, 1958

V. … To the same effect, see: Clements v. Hamilton-Brown Shoe Company, 99 Ark. 335 , 138 S. W. 971 ; Teal v. Thompson, 180 Ark. 63 , 20 S. W. 2d 307 , and; Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. H.

Arkansas State Banking Department v. Arkansas League of Savings Institutions, Inc.

307 Ark. 474 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 23, 1991

The trial court held for the appellees, and the appellants, Arkansas State Banking Board and other interested parties, appeal. … Schuman v. Certain Lands, 223 Ark. 85 , 264 S.W.2d 413 (1954). At the time Act 21 was enacted in 1935, savings and loans were clearly excluded.

Schmidt v. Pearson, Evans and Chadwick

326 Ark. 499 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 4, 1996

See Schmidt v. McIlroy Bank & Trust. The dissent by Justice Brown in Schmidt v. … The decision in Schmidt v. Mcflroy Bank & Trust is bad law. This court should take its earliest opportunity to reverse that decision, and adopt the position of Justice Brown’s dissent in that case.

Gibson v. Strong Co.

288 Ark. 615 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 28, 1986

In National Supply Co. v. … This type of argument was addressed in Klein v.

Gray v. State

311 Ark. 209 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 7, 1992

There they discovered a brown Buick automobile parked in a vacant lot. An occupant, Frederick Ellis, was crouched down in the passenger’s seat. … See, e.g., Henderson v. State, 279 Ark. 435 , 652 S.W.2d 16 (1983).

Whitt v. State

281 Ark. 466 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 27, 1984

We addressed the admissibility of in-court identification recently in Hogan v. … She said he was fifty to fifty-five years old, whereas appellant is forty-three, and that he had salt and pepper hair, whereas appellant’s hair is brown.

Mullins v. Commissioners of Bridge Improvement District No. 2

114 Ark. 324 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 12, 1914

Ferguson v. McLain, 113 Arfo. 193; 168 S. … Section 549, Kirby’s Digest, and Mullins v. Mayor, etc., supra.

Ben Motal v. City of Little Rock

2025 Ark. 40 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 10, 2025

See C.R.T., Inc. v. Brown, 269 Ark. 114, 117, 602 S.W.2d 409, 410–11 (1980) (citing Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co., 386 U.S. 714 (1967)). … See Strohm v. ClearOne Commc’ns, Inc., 308 P.3d 424, 446 (Utah 2013); Trope v. Katz, 902 P.2d 259, 267 (Cal. 1995); see also Upson v.

Wynn v. State

316 Ark. 414 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 21, 1994

See Brown v. State, 315 Ark. 466 , 869 S.W.2d 9 (1994). Even if a general renewal of all “objections” could be said to constitute renewal of all motions, it does not make clear to the court the grounds for severance. … See Richardson v. State, 292 Ark. 140 , 728 S.W.2d 189 (1987). Further, scattered transcript references throughout an argument are not a substitute for a proper abstract. See Watson v.

Dowdy v. State

2015 Ark. 35 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 5, 2015

Brown v. State, 374 Ark. 324, 327, 287 S.W.3d 587, 589 (2008); Ark. R. Crim. P. 33.1. … Brown, 374 Ark. at 327, 287 S.W.3d at 589 (citing Pinell v. State, 364 Ark. 353, 357, 219 S.W.3d 168, 171 (2005)).

ProAssurance Indemnity Co. v. Metheny

425 S.W.3d 689 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 13, 2012

BROWN, Justice, concurring. I agree with the majority opinion in every respect but one and that concerns whether ProAssurance preserved an objection to the disallowance of the use of Dr. Kim Bingaman’s deposition. … See Western Sizzlin Corp. v. Parks Land Co., LLLP, 2009 Ark. 277 , 309 S.W.3d 193 . In the instant case, it appears that the Methenys would be placed in that position. As a second matter, Dr.

St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. Kilpatrick

67 Ark. 47 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 28, 1899

Co. v. Dobbins, 60 Ark. 481 ; Brown v. St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry., 52 Ark. 120 . … In Nickens v.

State v. Johnson

317 Ark. 226 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 31, 1994

Brown, Justice. … David v. State, 286 Ark. 205 , 691 S.W.2d 133 (1985); Elam v.

Crawford v. State

184 Ark. 1027 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 21, 1931

Hannah v. State, 183 Ark. 810 , 38 S. W. (2d) 1090 ; Hunter v. State, 180 Ark. 613 , 22 S. W. (2d) 40 . … E. 616 ; State v. Miller, 131 Kan. 36 , 29 Pac. 483 .