Case law

Steele v. State

284 Ark. 340 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 21, 1984

In Schmerber v. … Long v. State, 284 Ark. 21 , 680 S.W.2d 686 (1984); Lovell v. State, 283 Ark. 425 , 678 S.W.2d 318 (1984); State v. Brown, 283 Ark. 304 , 675 S.W.2d 822 (1984); State v. Ziegenbein, 282 Ark. 162 , 666 S.W.2d 698 (1984).

Crebbin v. Deloney

70 Ark. 493 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 14, 1902

In Western Transportation & Coal Company v. Hilderhouse, 87 N. … Stevens v. Brown, 20 W. Va. 450, 461 . Rorer, Interstate Law, p. 206. The courts of no country will enforce the penal laws of another country. State v. Kirkpatrick, 32 Ark. 117, 120 . This seems to be a universal rule.

St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Hartung

95 Ark. 220 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 23, 1910

Co. v. … Co. v.

Southwest Power Pool, Inc. v. Kanis & Denny Roads Suburban Water Improvement District No. 349 of Pulaski County Ex Rel. Haas

489 S.W.3d 140 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 31, 2016

SPP challenged the 2014 reassessment, and the board of equalization confirmed it. … See, e.g., Rees v.

McAdams v. Ellington

333 Ark. 362 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 28, 1998

Gipson v. Brown, 288 Ark. 422, 431 , 706 S.W.2d 369, 374 (1986) (quoting Heathcoat v. Santa Fe Internat’l Corp., 532 P.Supp. 961 (E.D. … See Gipson v.

Chatmon v. State

2014 Ark. 397 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 25, 2014

CR-13-1006 ROLANDIS LARENZO CHATMON Opinion Delivered September 25, 2014 APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE FAULKNER V. … Contained in the instant record are three compact discs—two of which contain 911 calls made by two of the three victims and one containing recorded phone calls between Chatmon and his then girlfriend, Crystal Brown, who

Black v. Special School District No. 2

116 Ark. 472 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 25, 1915

In the case of Honey v. … In the case of Clarke v.

Dunaway v. Galbraith

139 Ark. 580 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 7, 1919

Thornton on the Law of Oil and Gas (3 ed.), vol. 2, sec. 899; Beebe v. St. Louis Transit Co., 12 L. R. A. (N. S.) 765; Brewster v. Layton Zinc Co., 72 C. C. A. 213 , 140 Fed. 801 ; Houssiere Latreille Oil Co. v. … In so holding we have not overlooked the opinion of the majority in Brown v. Wilson (Okla.), L. R. A. 1917 B. 1184 .

Paulino v. QHG of Springdale, Inc.

386 S.W.3d 462 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 9, 2012

Ctr. v. … Bell v.

Carson v. Dierks Lumber Coal Company

196 Ark. 163 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 25, 1938

Appellee says that Clawson and Mitchell testified they merely raised the bridge a few inches without taking it apart and putting in new boards, and the bridge Hethcock was talking about was torn to pieces and had new boards … Co. v. McCann, 190 Ark. 552 , 80 S. W. 2d 53 ; Long v. John Stephenson Co., 73 N. J. Law, 186, 63 Atl. 910 ; Sharpley v. Wright, 205 Pa. 253 , 54 Atl. 896 ; Hughes v.

Arkansas Foundry Co. v. Stanley

150 Ark. 127 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 10, 1921

Bennett v. Johnson, 130 Ark. 507 ; Easley v. Patterson, 142 Ark. 52 ; Johns v. Road Imp. Dist., 142 Ark. 73 ; Tarvin v. Road Imp. Dist. No. 1, 137 Ark. 355 ; and White v. Ark. & Mo. Highway Dist., 147 Ark. 160 . … and secretary of the board, and pledge and mortgage all assessments for the repayment thereof.

Bradley County v. Adams

243 Ark. 487 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 20, 1967

Co. v. Moore, 216 Ark. 44 , 223 S. W. 2d 1019 (1949), where we said: “Appellant insists that Dr. Monroe’s testimony is speculative, since he admitted the possibility that death was due to some other cause. … Brown and Fogleman, JJ., dissent.

Arkansas State Game & Fish Commission v. Kizer

221 Ark. 347 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 15, 1952

That at that time the interveners objected to the appointment of such board and stated that they would have no opportunity to cross-examine said engineers. . . . … W. 17 ; Spencer Lumber Company v. Dover, 99 Ark. 488 , 138 S. W. 985 ; Shelton v. Shelton, 102 Ark. 54 , 143 S. W. 110 ; Roberson v. Roberson, 188 Ark. 1018 , 69 S. W. 2d 275 .”

Martin v. State

46 Ark. 38 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 15, 1885

Brown v. State, 13 Ark., 96. The affidavit and warrant were not subject to demurrer-They had served their purpose in bringing the defendants before an officer and were of no future moment. … Straughan v. State, 16 Ark., 44. The statute authorizes a judgment against the surety in the appeal bond, on conviction of the principal, without further notice. Mansfield’s Digest, sec. 2435. Affirmed.

American Bauxite Co. v. Dunn

120 Ark. 1 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 12, 1915

The plaintiff boarded with Mr. Lorah at the time he was injured and had boarded there about two months prior thereto. The defendant offered to prove by Mr. … Driscoll v. Newark & Rosendale Lime & Cement Co., 97 Am.

Sirman v. Sloss Realty Co., Inc.

198 Ark. 534 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 12, 1939

Cook v. Donner, 145 Kan. 674 , 66 Pac. 2d 587 , 110 A. L. R. 244; Stager v. Junker, 188 A. 440 , 14 N. J. Misc. 913; Home Owners Loan Corporation v. Wilks, 130 Fla. 492 , 178 S. 161; Pye v. … W. 221 ; Jessewich v. Abbene, 154 Misc. 768 , 277 N. Y. S. 599; First Citizens Bank v. Speaker, 159 Misc. 427 , 287 N. Y. S. 831; Cheves County Building & Loan Ass’n v. Hodges, 40 N. M. 326, 59 Pac. 2d 671 .

William L. Andrews v. Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction

674 S.W.3d 450 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 28, 2023

Harmon v. Noel-Emsweller, 2022 Ark. 26. … Waller v.

Paving Dist. No. 3 of Harrison v. Fowler

192 Ark. 1122 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 5, 1936

Later appellee made valuable improvements upon said property, and, in the latter part of the year 1929, the board of assessors for appellant district, reassessed said property on account of said improvements and increased … See City Council of Camden v. Merchants & Planters Bank, 191 Ark. 1139 , 89 S. W. (2d) 739 .

High v. Bailey, Mayor

203 Ark. 461 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 22, 1941

It appears from the abstract of appellees that a sewer district has been created and a board of assessors appointed who have made an assessment of benefits of 26% per cent, of the assessed value of each tract of land in the … Board of Imp. Dist. v. Offenhauser, 84 Ark. 257 , 105 S. W. 265 ; Dunbar v. Street Imp. Dist. No. 1 of Dardanelle, 172 Ark. 656 , 290 S. W. 372 . We do not think appellants met the burden.

Taylor v. Zanone Properties

342 Ark. 465 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 26, 2000

See Lord v. Mazzanti, supra ; Ozark Bi-Products, Inc. v. Bohannon, supra . Consequently, we hold that the orders of July 2, 1999, and September 10, 1999, are null and void. Hayden v. Hayden, supra ; see also Slaton v. … BROWN, J., concurs. *83 ROBERT L. BROWN, Justice, concurring.