Case law

McCroskey v. State

272 Ark. 356 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 27, 1981

In Cox v. … Brown v. Keaton, 232 Ark. 12 , 334 S.W. 2d 676 (1960).

Colston v. State

346 Ark. 503 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 8, 2001

When he arrived on the scene, the van was not there, but he saw the name, “Colston,” on a wooden name board on the front porch. … Brown, Imber, and Hannah, JJ., dissent.

Venis v. State

350 Ark. 110 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 19, 2002

See, e.g., Ray v. State, 348 Ark. 304 , 73 S.W.3d 594 (2002) (per curiam); Brown v. State, 347 Ark. 362 , 64 S.W.3d 274 (2002) (per curiam); Ross v. … State, 346 Ark. 8 , 53 S.W.3d 519 (2001) (per curiam); In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam); Harkness v. State, 264 Ark. 561 , 572 S.W.2d 835 (1978).

Freeman v. Colonia Insurance

319 Ark. 211 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 9, 1995

Brown, Justice. … See Guebert v. Williams, 319 Ark. 43 , 889 S.W.2d 30 (1994); Wallner v. McDonald, 308 Ark. 590 , 825 S.W.2d 265 (1992); Davis v. Wausau Insur. Co., 315 Ark. 330 , 867 S.W.2d 444 (1993).

Ferrell v. Elkins

159 Ark. 31 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 21, 1923

Buchanan v. Farmer, 122 Ark. 562 , and Miller County H. & B. Dist. v. Cook, 134 Ark. 328 . … Tool Co. v. Norris, 2 Wall. (U. S.) 45. See also Cole v. Brown-Hurley Hardware Co. (Iowa), 18 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1161, and Kansas City Paper House v. Foley Railway Printing Co. (Kan.), 39 L. R. A. (N. S.) 747.

Smith v. Farm Service Cooperative

244 Ark. 119 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 19, 1968

Lyle Brown, Justice. This is a workmen’s compensation case. It was stipulated that Michael L. Smith, a minor, was fatally injured while in the employment of the appellee company, Farm Service Cooperative. … Crossett Lumber Co. v. Johnson, 208 Ark. 572 , 187 S. W. 2d 161 (1945). The Commission used the correct test.

Hamilton v. State

262 Ark. 366 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 31, 1977

Appellant primarily relies on Davis v. Mississippi, 394 U.S. 721 , 89 S. Ct. 1394 , 22 L. Ed. 2d 676 (1969), and Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590 , 95 S. Ct. 2254 , 45 L. … Brown v. State, 231 Ark. 363 , 329 S.W. 2d 521 (1959).

Wasson v. American Can Company

189 Ark. 354 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 4, 1934

Under act 113 of the Acts of 1913, this court ruled in the case of Bank of Morrilton v. Skipper, Tucker & Co., 165 Ark. 49 , 263 S. … This ruling was confirmed in the case of Citizens’ Bank of Booneville v. Clements, 172 Ark. 1023 , 291 S. W. 439 . The court found in the instant case that the guaranties were for the benefit of the banks.

Deason v. Farmers & Merchants Bank

299 Ark. 167 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 12, 1989

Joey Brown Interest, Inc. v. Merchants Nat’l Bank, 284 Ark. 418 , 683 S.W.2d 601 (1985). … In Brown v.

Ellis v. Terrell

109 Ark. 69 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 30, 1913

Justice Battle in his dissenting opinion in Bank of Newport v. Cook, supra. … Co. v. Brown, 67 Ark. 302 ; St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. Cleere, 76 Ark. 377 . The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Tedford v. Tedford

224 Ark. 1035 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 18, 1955

Brown v. Missouri Pacific Transportation Co., 189 Ark. 885 , 75 S. W. 2d 804 . In the Brown case the term ‘ ‘ recoupment ’ ’ is used. … Hayes v. Sanger, 218 Ark. 716 , 239 S. W. 2d 22 .

Doyle v. Williams

251 Ark. 797 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 17, 1972

See Jones v. Brinkman, 200 Ark. 583 , 139 S. W. 2d 686 (1940): Edwards v. Bernstein, 21 S. W. 2d 133 (Ky. 1929); 56 Am. Jur., Venue, § 13. … J., and Brown, J., dissent.

Town of Wrightsville v. Walton

255 Ark. 523 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 19, 1973

Lyle Brown, Justice. The Pulaski County Court granted a petition to incorpórate the Wrightsville community. Appellee Walton attacked that order by proper complaint filed in the Pulaski Circuit Court. … Russell v. Cockrill, Judge, 211 Ark. 123 , 199 S.W. 2d 584 (1947). To the same effect see Compton v. State, 102 Ark. 213 , 1443 S.W. 897 (1911). Compton quotes from 2 Lewis’ Sutherland, Stat.

Jarboe v. Shelter Insurance

317 Ark. 395 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 20, 1994

Shelter moved to dismiss the complaint, and the circuit judge granted the motion and stated that Shelter “was not required to notify the State Plant Board of nonrenewal.” Jarboe v. Shelter Ins. … Harvison v. Charles E. Davis & Assoc., 310 Ark. 104 , 835 S.W.2d 284 (1992).

Taffner v. State

541 S.W.3d 430 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 29, 2018

In Brown v. … Brown sought access to the calendar and the circuit court denied Brown access and ruled that calendar was work-product.

Central Oklahoma Pipeline, Inc. v. Hawk Field Services, LLC

400 S.W.3d 701 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 12, 2012

McLane Southern, Inc. v. Davis, 366 Ark. 164 , 233 S.W.3d 674 (2006). In Roberson v. … Appellant also asserts that the statute is not 11finecessary because the licensing board may punish contractors who fail to comply ■with its rules and regulations. We rejected a similar claim in Williams v.

McCoy v. Moore

338 Ark. 740 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 7, 1999

In Jackson v. Arkansas Power & Light Co., 309 Ark. 572 , 832 S.W.2d 224 (1992), Jackson moved to vacate the trial court’s judgment as being contrary to the law, public policy, and the evidence. … See Arkansas State Highway Comm’n v. Ayres, 311 Ark. 212 , 842 S.W.2d 853 (1992). Brown, Imber, and Thornton, JJ., dissent.

Scott v. State

254 Ark. 271 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 16, 1973

Davis v. State, 246 Ark. 838 , 440 S.W.2d 244 , cert. denied, 403 U.S. 954 , 91 S. Ct. 2273 , 29 L. Ed. 2d 865 (1971). … See Mode v. State, 234 Ark. 46 , 350 S.W.2d 675 . The judgment is affirmed.

Horne v. Paragould Special School District No. 1

186 Ark. 1000 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 20, 1933

Appellant contends that § 8977, Crawford & Moses’ Digest, and the decisions of this court in Schmutz v. Special School District of Little Rock, 78 Ark. 119 , 95 S. W. 438 , and Am. Ex. Trust Co. v. … Said section provides: “To borrow money and mortgage the real property of the district as security therefor under such conditions and regulations as to amount, time and manner of payment as the board of directors of said

Dickinson v. McCoppin

121 Ark. 414 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 20, 1915

In the case of Thomas Manufacturing Co. v. Prather, 65 Ark. 27 , this court quoted with ,approval the rule announced by the court of appeals of New York in Vrooman v. Turner, 69 N. … That is the clear result of our decision in the case of Thomas Manufacturing Co. v. Prather, supra.