Case law

McGregor v. Miller

173 Ark. 459 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 4, 1927

Counsel recognizes the effect of our decisions in the cases of Kirk v. High and Nelson v. Walker, supra. Indeed, there appears to be no reason to misapprehend their purport. … Vale v. Buchanan, 98 Ark. 299 , 135 S.W. 848 ; Watkins v. Finger, 120 Ark. 476 , 179 S.W. 653 .

Howard's Cleaners v. Munsey

289 Ark. 22 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 5, 1986

We addressed this issue in Howard’s Laundry and Cleaners v. … Ferguson v. City of Mountain Pine, 278 Ark. 575 , 647 S.W.2d 460 (1983). The judgment is affirmed. Purtle, J., not participating.

Williams v. State

85 Ark. 464 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 9, 1908

Appellant Williams is the keeper of a boarding house in the city of Hot Springs, and he appeals to this court from a judgment of conviction for drumming on a railroad train for his boarding house, in violation of a statute … In Emerson v.

Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Mizell

118 Ark. 153 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 5, 1915

Co. v. Taylor, 84 Ark. 42 , which is our leading case on the right to recover damages to compensate for mental .anguish unaccompanied by physical injury. … Co. v. Brown, 97 Ark. 505 .

Kelly v. Rogers

258 Ark. 865 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 10, 1975

The complaint states no facts constituting a cause of action against Rogers, who is secretary of the State Board of Law Examiners, or anyone else. … Wernimont v. State ex rel. Little Rock Bar Assn., 101 Ark. 210 , 142 S.W. 194 , Ann. Cas. 1913D, 1156 (1911).

Simons v. Davis

263 Ark. 574 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 30, 1978

In Brockman v. … Board of Directors of Jefferson County Bridge District, 188 Ark. 396 , 66 S.W. 2d 619 , we made the following observation: “ ‘There are two ways of repealing a statute or part thereof; one is by express terms, the other by

City of West Memphis v. City of Marion

332 Ark. 421 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 26, 1998

On February 18, 1997, Marion filed a complaint in the Crittenden County Circuit Court, seeking a writ of mandamus against West Memphis and the Crittenden County Board of Election Commissioners to remove the 2,340 acres from … Cosgrove v. City of West Memphis, 327 Ark. 324 , 938 S.W.2d 827 (1997); Lee v. Villines, 328 Ark. 189 , 942 S.W.2d 844 (1997) ....

Harris Lumber Co. v. Morris

80 Ark. 260 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 15, 1906

Co. v. Stroude, 77 Ark. 109 ; Railway v. Hall, 53 Ark. 7 . … Co. v. Brown, 73 Ark. 42 . Reversed and remanded for a new trial. Hire, C. J., disqualified and not participating.

Selph v. Quapaw Vocational Technical School

278 Ark. 23 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 13, 1982

Arkansas Livestock and Poultry Commission v. House, 276 Ark. 326 , 634 S.W.2d 388 (1982). … We do not have an attempt to appeal from an adverse ruling of an officer or board authorized to discharge employees. The question here is one of a board that has no authority in a matter and yet makes a decision.

Wood v. State

287 Ark. 203 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 21, 1985

State v. Brown, 283 Ark. 304 , 675 S.W.2d 822 (1984). The court correctly instructed the jury that the State had the burden of proving sexual intercourse or deviate sexual activity, both of which were defined.

Reynolds v. State

199 Ark. 961 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 12, 1940

Jess Brown testified that while they were standing* at the car appellant told them that the hogs belonged to a negro who paid them to come down and catch the hogs. … In the case of Driggers v.

Walker v. State

287 Ark. 76 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 30, 1985

Brown v. State, 278 Ark. 604 , 648 S.W.2d 67 (1983); Gray v. State, 252 Ark. 404 , 479 S.W.2d 560 (1972). The only cases cited by the appellant are Warren v. … State, 261 Ark. 173 , 547 S.W.2d 392 (1977); and Inklebarger v. State, 252 Ark. 953 , 481 S.W.2d 750 (1972).

City of Little Rock v. Cash

277 Ark. 494 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 6, 1982

I feel the majority should have quoted that part of the record where the attorney for the appellees in the present case offered to give the Phillips v. … I have no doubt that the present attorney for the appellant feels that he has misled attorney Henry because he has been forced by the board of directors to back down on his word that the Phillips v.

Bowen v. State

342 Ark. 581 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 9, 2000

Brown, Justice. Appellant Jamie Paul Bowen appeals from a judgment of conviction for first-degree murder and a sentence of life imprisonment. … Burmingham v. State, 342 Ark. 95 , 27 S.W.3d 351 (2000); Lee v. State, 326 Ark. 229 , 931 S.W.2d 433 (1996). Thus, we consider this issue before reviewing asserted trial error. Burmingham v. State, supra; Lee v.

Richison v. Boatright

238 Ark. 579 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 2, 1964

The jury could have found that he was careless in walking too close to the edge, even if the protective board referred to by McKinney had somehow been removed. On this point the case is similar to Headrick v. H. D. … Ry. v.

Neal v. Neal

194 Ark. 226 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 14, 1937

Robinson v. Robinson, 45 Ark. 481 ; Eastham v. Powell, 51 Ark. 530 , 11 S. W. 823 ; Goodwin v. Parnell, 69 Ark. 629 , 65 S. W. 427 ; Jackson v. Richardson, 182 Ark. 997 , 33 S. W. (2d) 1095 . … Tbis court, from Hynson v.

Bohannan v. Underwood

300 Ark. 110 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 2, 1989

Rule 103(a)(1); Walt Bennett Ford, Inc. v. Brown, 283 Ark. 1 , 670 S.W.2d 441 (1984). The challenged testimony arose as follows; A. Well, he said that he had done— MR.

Person v. Miller Levee District No. 2

202 Ark. 876 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 2, 1941

The chairman of the board called the president of the bank over the telephone from the room where the board meeting was in session. … It was held in the case of Daniels v. Board of Directors of St. Francis Levee District, 84 Ark. 333 , 105 S.

Sumpter v. Hot Springs Savings, Trust & Guaranty Co.

126 Ark. 155 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 30, 1916

Under the by-laws of the bank no loan exceeding $200.00 could be made without the approval of the discount board, and this loan was submitted to and approved by the said board. … “The parties cite and rely upon the cases of Thompson v. Ingram, 51 Ark. 546 , 11 S. W. 881 , and Vahlberg v. Keaton, 51 Ark. 534 , 11 S. W. 878 , 4 L. R. A. 462, 14 Am. St. Rep. 73 .

Sparrow v. State

284 Ark. 396 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 21, 1985

See Brown v. State, 276 Ark. 20 , 631 S.W.2d 829 (1982). The other arguments that Sparrow raises on appeal have been answered in other cases. Ark. Stat. Ann. § 75-2503 (b) (Supp. 1983) is not void for vagueness. … Lovell v. State, 283 Ark. 425 , 678 S.W.2d 318 (1984); Long v. State, 284 Ark. 21 , 680 S.W.2d 686 (1984).