Case law

Person v. Miller Levee District No. 2

202 Ark. 876 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 2, 1941

The chairman of the board called the president of the bank over the telephone from the room where the board meeting was in session. … It was held in the case of Daniels v. Board of Directors of St. Francis Levee District, 84 Ark. 333 , 105 S.

Dierks Lumber Coal Company v. Noles

201 Ark. 1088 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 3, 1941

National Labor Relations Board, 303 U. S. 453 , 58 S. Ct. 656 , 82 L. Ed. 954 ; Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 305 U. S. 197 , 59 S. Ct. 206 , 83 L. … Ed. 126 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 301 U. S. 1 , 57 S. Ct. 615 , 81L. Ed. 893, 108 A. L. R. 1352, and National Labor Relations Board v. Fruehauf Trailer Co., 301 U. S. 49 , 57 S.

Road Improvement District No. 4 v. Ball

170 Ark. 522 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 22, 1926

Boyd v. Roane, 49 Ark. 397 ; McConnell v. Day, 61 Ark. 464 ; Clay v. Bilby, 72 Ark. 101 ; Jones v. Ainell, 123 Ark. 532 ; Lashbrook v. Tri-County Highway Imp. Dist., 152 Ark. 461 . … Ederheimer v. Carson Dry Goods Co., 105 Ark. 488 ; Lashbrook v. Tri-County Highway Imp. Dist., supra; Tri-County Highway Imp. Dist. v. Vincennes Bridge Co. ante p. 22; Howard-Sevier Rd. Imp. Dist. v. Hunt, 166 Ark. 62 .

London & Lancashire Fire Insurance v. Ludwig

86 Ark. 581 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 15, 1908

In Commercial Fire Insurance Co. v. … In Sanger v. Upton, 91 U. S. 60 , it is said: “The capital stock of an incorporated company is a fund set apart for the payment of its debts.

Shanks v. Clark

175 Ark. 883 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 19, 1927

Zackery v. Brown, 17 Ark. 442 ; Holland v. Clark, 32 Ark. 697 ; Moore v. Horsley, 42 Ark. 163 . In Peay v. Pulaski Co., 103 Ark. 601 , 148 S. … Lawrence County Bank v. Arendt, 69 Ark. 406 , 65 S. W. 1052 .

Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Mizell

118 Ark. 153 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 5, 1915

Co. v. Taylor, 84 Ark. 42 , which is our leading case on the right to recover damages to compensate for mental .anguish unaccompanied by physical injury. … Co. v. Brown, 97 Ark. 505 .

Dundee Woolen Mills v. Chism

215 Ark. 126 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 18, 1949

Owen v. Dix, 210 Ark. 562 , 196 S. W. 2d 913 . … Williams & Sons, Inc. v. Smith, 205 Ark. 604 , 170 S. W. 2d 82 ; Kloss v. Ford, Bacon & Davis, Inc., 207 Ark. 115 , 179 S. W. 2d 172 ; Simmons National Bank v. Brown, 210 Ark. 311 , 195 S. W. 2d 539 . Affirmed.

Railway Co. v. B'Shears

59 Ark. 237 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 9, 1894

In the case of Sturges v. … Sims v. Cumby, 53 Ark. 421 ; McGaughey v. Brown, 46 Ark. 37 ; Springfield, etc. Ry. Co. v. Lambert, 42 Ark. 122 ; Memphis, etc. Railroad Co. v. Carllee, 39 Ark. 246 .

Loy v. Bean

217 Ark. 684 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 9, 1950

The five newly elected board members met and determined the length of their respective terms by lot as provided in § 2 of Act 324, supra, Bean drawing the short term of one year. … Stroud v. Fryar, 216 Ark. 250 , 225 S. W. 2d 23 .

Bryan v. City of Cotter

344 S.W.3d 654 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 1, 2009

Moix-McNutt v. Brown, 348 Ark. 518, 521 , 74 S.W.3d 612, 613 (2002); Ragar v. Brown, 332 Ark. 214 , 964 S.W.2d 372 (1998); Chapman v. Alexander, 307 Ark. 87 , 817 S.W.2d 425 (1991). … Contractors, Inc. v.

Teague v. State

141 Ark. 182 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 15, 1919

Ashcraft v. State, 140 Ark. 505 . .Appellant offered to show that it was dangerous to dip cattle and that injuries frequently resulted, but the court excluded the testimony. … This was correct, as it is not a question for the jury to determine whether or not it was proper to dip cattle, for the language of the law compels obedience to the requirements of the Board of Control. Boyer v.

Wilson v. Blanks

95 Ark. 496 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 27, 1910

council may supply water and light to private consumers, and make and collect uniform charges for such service, and apply the income thereof to the payment of operating expenses and maintenance of such works.” ■ In Cráne v. … Kansas City, Pittsburg & Gulf Railway Company v. Waterworks Improvement District No. 1 of Siloam Springs, 68 Ark. 376, 378 ; Whipple v. Tuxworth, 81 Ark. 391, 403 . Decree affirmed.

Harrison Stave Co. v. Rockhill

194 Ark. 347 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 28, 1937

Rockhill, filed September 4, 1936, contained a denial that she had rendered any services at the request of the board of directors. … Bock-hill, plaintiff, v. Harrison Stave Company et al., defendants.” The decree of December 31 is styled: “E. Bock-hill, plaintiff, v. Harrison Stave Company, H. F. Kings-ley, and F. W. Evans, defendants; Mrs. E.

McCullough v. State

353 Ark. 362 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 29, 2003

McCULLOUGH v. STATE of Arkansas; The Honorable Sam Pope, Circuit Judge. No. 02-873. Supreme Court of Arkansas. May 29, 2003. Darrell F. Brown & Assoc., by: Darrell F. Brown; and McCullough Law Firm, by: R.S. … BROWN, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part. CORBIN, J., not participating. ROBERT L. BROWN, Justice, concurring in part and dissenting in part.

Hunt v. Davis

98 Ark. 44 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 27, 1911

Cooper v. Schlesinger, 111 U. S. 148 ; Kountzc v. Kennedy, 147 N. Y. 124 ; Cole v. Cassidy, 138 Mass. 437 . … Gammill v. Johnson, 47 Ark. 335 ; Graham v. Thompson, 55 Ark. 296 ; Stewart v. Fleming, 96 Ark. 371 ; Evatt v. Hudson, 97 Ark. 265 .

Phillips v. State

334 Ark. 578 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 22, 1998

Phillips v. State, CACR 96-986 (April 16, 1997). The mandate was issued to the circuit clerk on May 6, 1997. … Brown, J., dissents.

Glidewell v. Martin

51 Ark. 559 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 15, 1889

Vissant v. Knox, 27 Ark., 279; English v. Oliver, 28 Ark., 317; State v. L. R., M. R. & T. Ry., 31 Ark., 717; Worthen v. Badgett, 32 Ark., 516, 518; Smithee v. Garth, 33 Ark., 25, 26; Chicot Co. v. … Endlich on Interpretation of Statutes, sec. 520; Baker v. State, 44 Ark., 137; Board of Equalization Cases, 49 Ark., 525.

Robertson v. Rural Special School District No. 9

155 Ark. 161 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 9, 1922

No. 30 v. … No. 6 v. Blaylock, 122 Ark. 418 . It may not be out of place to state in this connection that the General Assembly of 1919 amended the statute so that the proceedings are now had before the county boards of education.

Parsons v. Mason

223 Ark. 281 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 8, 1954

In construing earlier statutes we held in McLeod v. Richardson, 204 Ark. 558 , 163 S. … It was there decided that § 80-213 transferred to the county board of education jurisdiction of election contests involving the office of school director.

Jernigan v. Harris

187 Ark. 705 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 3, 1933

Clallam County, Washington, v. United States Spruce Products Corporation, 263 U. S. 341 , 44 S. Ct. 121 ; United States v. Coghlan, 261 Fed. 424 ; United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation v. … In the case of Mississippi Valley Power Co. v. Board of Improvement Water Works District No. 1, 185 Ark. 76 , 46 S.