Case law

Allen v. Rankin

269 Ark. 517 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 7, 1980

Ann. § 3-506.1 (Supp. 1977) authorizing prosecuting attorneys to defend a county board of election commissioners should cause us to overrule Henry v. Stuart, supra. … Further, in Goggin v.

Wilson v. Weiss

368 Ark. 300 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 14, 2006

See, e.g., Roe v. … Fayetteville, supra; Owen, supra; Board of Trustees v. City of Little Rock, 295 Ark. 585 , 750 S.W.2d 950 (1988); Streight v. Ragland, 280 Ark. 206 , 655 S.W.2d 459 (1983). Of particular interest, is Phillips v.

Bailey v. State

254 Ark. 628 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 4, 1973

Lyle Brown, Justice. This is an appeal from a Rule I hearing in which appellant was denied relief. Six points are listed for reversal, not one of which was listed in his petition. He never amended his petition. … Orman v. Bishop, 245 Ark. 887 , 435 S.W. 2d 440 (1968); Credit v. State, 247 Ark. 424 , 445 S.W. 2d 718 (1969); Ballew v. State, 249 Ark. 480 , 459 S.W. 2d 577 (1970); Carney v.

Ark. State Police Ret. Sys. v. Sligh

2017 Ark. 209 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 30, 2017

Furthermore, in Weiss v. … In Short v.

Central Coal & Coke Co. v. Orwig

150 Ark. 635 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 5, 1921

Co. v. Kitchens, 98 Ark. 507 ; C. R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Smith, 107 Ark. 512 ; Central Coal & Coke Co. v. Graham, 129 Ark. 550 ; Pekin Cooperage Co. v. Duty, 140 Ark. 135 ; Boston, etc. Mining Co. v. … See Williams v. Cantwell, 114 Ark. 542 ; Pekin Stave & Mfg. Co. v. Ramey, 104 Ark. 1 .

Shropshire v. State

86 Ark. 481 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 8, 1908

On the other hand, Tom Brown and Henry Johnson each testified to facts that showed that the defendant was not a participant in said game. … What was said in Vaughan v.

St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company v. Bley

168 Ark. 814 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 4, 1925

In the case of Cruse v. St. L. I. M. & S. R. … Appellee could easily have walked from the place where he boarded the train to the station, but it was to save this walk that he boarded the train.

Parker v. Parker

99 Ark. 244 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 22, 1911

Counsel for plaintiff rely upon the case of Stearns v. Mullen, 4 Gray (Mass.), 151 , to sustain their contention that the fee to the soil of the road was reserved to the grantor by the clause in question. … As illustrative cases, we cite the following: Abraham v. Abbott, 8 Ore. 53 ; Winston v. Johnson, 42 Minn. 398 ; Kister v. Reeser, 98 Pa. St. 1, 42 Am. Rep. 608 ; Brown v. Anderson, 88 Ky. 577 ; Ashcroft v.

Jensen v. Dierks Lumber Coal Company

209 Ark. 262 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 5, 1945

What we have said in the case of Raef, County Clerk, v. Radio Broadcasting, Inc., ante, p. 253, 190 S. W. 2d 1 , is not controlling here, as the facts are not similar. Nor is the rule laid down in Wells Fargo & Co., v. … A. 371, and followed in Arlington Hotel Co. v. Buchanan, 110 Ark. 34 , 160 S. W. 895 , controlling.

Plunkett v. Winchester

98 Ark. 160 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 6, 1911

Haney v. Caldwell, 43 Ark. 193 ; National Surety Co. v. Long, 79 Ark. 528 ; Eastern Ark. Hedge Fence Co. v. Tanner, 67 Ark. 156 . … McMurray v. Brown, 91 U. S. 257 .

Hignight v. Blevins Implement Co.

220 Ark. 399 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 21, 1952

Co. v. Dover, 99 Ark. 488 , 138 S. W. 985 . The written contract of sale provides that it is made without any express or implied warranties. … Brown & Co. v. Bennett, 122 Ark. 570 , 184 S. W. 35 ; Rest., Agency, § 275. On the whole, this case cannot Toe distinguished from Pate v. J. S. McWilliams Auto Co., 193 Ark. 620 , 101 S.

Grassy Slough Drainage District No. 1 v. National Box Co.

111 Ark. 144 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 26, 1914

This court, in the case of Board of Directors of St. Francis Levee District v. … Shibley v. Fort Smith & Van Buren District, 96 Ark. 410 ; Board of Directors of Jefferson County Bridge District v. Collier, 104 Ark. 425 .

Arkansans for Healthy Eyes, a Ballot Question Committee; And Vicki Farmer, Individually and on Behalf of Arkansans for Healthy Eyes v. John Thurston, in His Official Capacity as Secretary of State of the State of Arkansas; Safe Surgery Arkansas, a Ballot Question Committee; And Laurie Barber, M.D., Individually and on Behalf of Safe Surgery Arkansas, an Original Action

2020 Ark. 277 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 17, 2020

Arkansans for Healthy Eyes v. Thurston, 2020 Ark. 129. … I dissent for the reasons stated in my dissent in Miller v.

Henry v. Buchanan

364 Ark. 485 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 5, 2006

Brown, Justice. … v.

Wallace v. State

251 Ark. 445 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 22, 1971

Lyle Brown, Justice. This is an appeal from an order denying appellant’s petition for a writ of error coram nobis. … Martinez v. State, 419 S. W. 2d 369 (Texas 1967); Johns v. Warden, 124 A. 2d 283 (Md. 1956); Wilson v. State, 155 So. 2d 611 (Ala. 1963); People v. Girard, App., 93 Cal. Rptr. 676 (1971).

Hyde v. Quinn

298 Ark. 569 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 8, 1989

In Martin v. Quinn, 294 Ark. 60 , 740 S.W.2d 627 (1987), we affirmed the Little Rock Board of Directors’ refusal to remove the district’s commissioners from office. In Henderson Methodist Church v. … One of the central issues in the Martin case was whether the Board of Directors erred in finding that neither of the commissioners was interested in these same contracts.

Kirby & Co. v. Tompkins

48 Ark. 273 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 15, 1886

Dig., sec. 5181; Brown v. Standford, 22 Ark., 76; Neiss v. Gillian, 27 ib., 184; Wells on Replevin, secs. 485,487,491,713. … Fleck v. Warner, 25 Kansas, 492. Reversed and a new trial ordered.

Arkansas Valley Bank v. Kelley

176 Ark. 387 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 27, 1928

Bryant v. Moore, 26 Maine 84 , 45 Am. Dec. 96 ; Thacher v. Pray, 113 Mass. 291 , Am. Rep. 480; Brown v. Wright, 58 Ark. 20 , 22 S. W. 1022 , 21 L. R. A. 467. … Stephens v. Board of Education, 79 N. Y. 183 , 35 Am. Rep. 511 ; Hatch v. Bank, 147 N. Y. 184 , 41 N. E. 403 ; Justh v. Bank, 56 N. Y. 478 ; Smith v. Bank, 107 Iowa 620 , 78 N. W. 238 .

School District No. 45 v. School District No. 8

119 Ark. 149 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 7, 1915

On both sides of the controversy, the case of Hudspeth v. Wallis, 54 Ark. 134 , is cited, with the contention that it is decisive of this case, but we do not find that it has any bearing on the question now involved. … Hale v. Brown, 70 Ark. 471 ; Stephens v. School District, 104 Ark. 145 ; Carpenter v. Leatherman, 117 Ark. 531 , 176 S. W. 113 .

Storthz v. Watts

125 Ark. 393 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 16, 1916

The opinion on the former appeal is reported in 117 Ark. page 500, under the style of Storthz v. Watts. Reference to that opinion is made for a more extended statement of the issues involved. … Co. v. Thornton, 98 Ark. 61 ; Brown v. Simsboro Cash Store, 102 Ark. 531 ; Wallace v. St. L. I. M. & S. Ry. Co., 83 Ark. 356 ; Reisinger v. Johnson, 110 Ark. 7 .