Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersark

10,000+ results

2.89s

  • Boatmen's Trust Co. v. Buchbinder

    343 Ark. 1 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 30, 2000

    Nelson v. River Valley Bank & Trust, 334 Ark. 172, 179 , 971 S.W.2d 777, 781 (1998) (citing Security Pac. Housing Servs., Inc. v. Friddle, 315 Ark. 178 , 866 S.W.2d 375 (1993); Chrisco v. Sun Indus. … Crockett & Brown, P.A. v. Courson, 312 Ark. 363 , 849 S.W.2d 938 (1993).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Flake v. Arkansas State Highway Comm'n

    251 Ark. 1084 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 28, 1972

    Lyle Brown, Justice. Appellants are property owners at the northeast corner of Markham and Scott Streets in Little Rock. They brought this suit to enjoin appellee commission. … The exact question before us was decided in Arkansas State Highway Comm’n v. Partain, 192 Ark. 127 , 90 S. W. 2d 968 (1936). The law there pronounced has subsequently been followed in Bryant v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Arkansas Valley Bank v. Kelley

    176 Ark. 387 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 27, 1928

    Bryant v. Moore, 26 Maine 84 , 45 Am. Dec. 96 ; Thacher v. Pray, 113 Mass. 291 , Am. Rep. 480; Brown v. Wright, 58 Ark. 20 , 22 S. W. 1022 , 21 L. R. A. 467. … Stephens v. Board of Education, 79 N. Y. 183 , 35 Am. Rep. 511 ; Hatch v. Bank, 147 N. Y. 184 , 41 N. E. 403 ; Justh v. Bank, 56 N. Y. 478 ; Smith v. Bank, 107 Iowa 620 , 78 N. W. 238 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Teague v. State

    141 Ark. 182 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 15, 1919

    Ashcraft v. State, 140 Ark. 505 . .Appellant offered to show that it was dangerous to dip cattle and that injuries frequently resulted, but the court excluded the testimony. … This was correct, as it is not a question for the jury to determine whether or not it was proper to dip cattle, for the language of the law compels obedience to the requirements of the Board of Control. Boyer v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Palmer v. Arkansas Employment Security Division

    265 Ark. 571 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 23, 1979

    In McCain v. … McCain v. Crossett Lumber Co., supra; and Hervey v. Const. Helicopters, 252 Ark. 728 , 480 S.W. 2d 577 (1973).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Kirby & Co. v. Tompkins

    48 Ark. 273 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 15, 1886

    Dig., sec. 5181; Brown v. Standford, 22 Ark., 76; Neiss v. Gillian, 27 ib., 184; Wells on Replevin, secs. 485,487,491,713. … Fleck v. Warner, 25 Kansas, 492. Reversed and a new trial ordered.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Crow v. Special School District No. 2

    102 Ark. 401 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 19, 1912

    The certificate must be executed in triplicate, and one copy retained by the board; another delivered to the lender, and the third shall be filed by the board of directors with the clerk of the county court, and “upon the … Common School District No. 13 v. Oak Grove Special School District, post p. 411; Scott v. McCollough, 75 N. E. 52 ; Fulks v. Wright, 75 N. E. 55 . The decree is affirmed.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Hines v. Road Improvement District No. 5

    145 Ark. 382 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 18, 1920

    Co. v. … Co. v. Conway Bridge Dist., supra; C., R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Road Imp. Dist. No. 1 of Prairie County, 137 Ark. 587 -91; Mudd v. St. Francis Drainage Dist., 117 Ark. 30, 31 . See, also, Mo. Pac. Rd. Co. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Indian Bayou Drainage District v. Walt

    154 Ark. 335 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 26, 1922

    See Rayder v. Warrick, 133 Ark. 491 ; Hout v. Harvey, 135 Ark. 102 ; Carson v. Rd. Imp. Dist., 150 Ark. 379 ; Higginbotham v. Road Imp. Dist., ante p. 112. … See Protho v. Williams, 147 Ark. 535, 546 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Micklish v. Grand Lodge of Loyal Star

    162 Ark. 71 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 21, 1924

    In Bonham v. … Thomas v. Musical Mutual Protective Union, 121 N. Y. 45 , and Bigelow v. Hartford Bridge Company, 14 Conn. 565 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Thomas v. City of Hot Springs

    34 Ark. 553 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 15, 1879

    Therefore, be it ordained by the mayor and board of aldermen of the city of Hot Springs, that, any person who shall be found drumming, running, or soliciting strangers or visitors to this place for any hotel, boardinghouse … In Tuck v. Town of Waldron, 31 Ark., 462, the corporation attempted, under an ordinance passed by its council, to punish Tuck criminally for selling a half-gallon of whisky without obtaining license.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Woodleaf

    21 Kan. 717 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 15, 1879

    (Town of Leroy v. McConnell, 8 Kas. 273 ; Brown v. Holmes, 13 Kas. 482 .) This last case is exactly in point. … We have already decided the other way, in Brown v. Holmes, supra.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State Use Ashley County v. Riley.

    194 Ark. 485 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 12, 1937

    Harrod v. St. L. I. M. & S. Ry. Co., 98 Ark. 596 , 136 S. W. 974 ; Brown v. Norvell, 88 Ark. 590 , 115 S. W. 372 . To entitle a party to appeal there must have been a final decree rendered in the case. Foley v. … Goodwin v. Caraleigh Phosphate & Fertilizer Works, 123 N. C. 162 , 31 S. E. 373 ; Eastman v. Dunn, 75 Atl. Rep. 697 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Sheridan v. State

    331 Ark. 1 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 8, 1998

    Brown. Prior to trial, Robert, under Mr. Hall’s guidance, pled guilty to hindering apprehension and agreed to testify for the State in the appellant’s trial. … See United States v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Eubanks v. State

    375 Ark. 239 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 11, 2008

    See Brown v. State, 373 Ark. 453 , 284 S.W.3d 481 (2008) (per curiam). However, good cause must be shown to grant the motion. See Strom v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Becker v. Riviere

    277 Ark. 252 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 26, 1982

    Appellants brought an action in the chancery court of Pulaski County to enjoin appellee, Paul Riviere, Secretary of State, from furnishing the State Board and County Boards of Election Commissioners with the “Ballot Title … See Jones v. McDade, 200 Ala. 230 , 75 So. 988 (1917).

    Cited 40 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. Spangler

    176 Ark. 328 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 20, 1928

    Slagle v. Box, 124 Ark. 43 , 186 S. W. 299 ; Simpson v. Brown-Desnoyers Shoe Co., 70 Ark. 598 , 70 S. W. 305 ; Brown v. Hutchings, 14 Ark. 84 . … Burr v. Williams, 20 Ark. 171 ; Chase v. Carney, 60 Ark. 491 , 31 S. W. 43 ; and Joy v. Phelps, 65 Ark. 1 , 45 S. W. 990 .” In the case of Gorman v. Pettus, 72 Ark. 76 , 77 S.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Emerson v. McNeil

    84 Ark. 552 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 9, 1907

    Fayetteville v. Carter, 52 Ark. 301 ; Hot Springs v. Curry, 64 Ark. 152 . … Paul v. Smith, 27 Minn. 364 ; Veneman v. Jones, 118 Ind. 41 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Grimmett v. Digby

    267 Ark. 192 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 26, 1979

    V § 20supra. The same principle has been recognized by most of the authorities. See Belknap v. Schild, 161 U.S. 10 , 16 S. … Ry. v.

    Overruled on other grounds by Craven v. Fulton Sanitation Service, Inc., 361 Ark. 390 (2005)Cited 12 timesPublished
  • McLeod v. Purnell

    164 Ark. 596 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 9, 1924

    In La Prairie v. … And in Special School District No. 33 v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.