Case law

Strawn v. Campbell

226 Ark. 449 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 2, 1956

See also County Board of Education v. Austin, 169 Ark. 436 , 276 S. W. 2 . … Evans v. Perciful, 5 Ark. 424 ; Estes v. Martin, 34 Ark. 410 .

Nance v. State

318 Ark. 758 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 21, 1994

In Kelly v. … HAYS and BROWN, JJ., dissent. BROWN, Justice, dissenting. I would grant the motion and not send the names of the defense attorneys to the Professional Conduct Committee.

Moore v. Turner

43 Ark. 243 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 15, 1884

St. 270, in connection with Seo. 5206 of Gantt’s Digest; Keller v. Savage, 20 Maine, 199; Buffalo & State Line R. R. Co. v. Board of Supervisors of Erie Co., 48 N. … Stronger still is the case of the School District No. 1. of Owosso v. The Joint Board of School Inspectors, 27 Mich., 3 , cited also by Mr. Cooley.

Kansas City, Pittsburg & Gulf Railway Co. v. Waterworks Improvement District No. 1

68 Ark. 376 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 27, 1900

In construing these sections this court, in Van Buren v. … Co. v. Grand Rapids, 28 L. R. A. 793, and citations in the dissenting opinion: Matter of Commissioner of Public Parks, 47 Hun (N. Y.) 302; Chicago, M. & S. P. R. Co. v. Milwaukee, 89 Wis. 506 .

Hervey v. Farms, Inc.

252 Ark. 881 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 19, 1972

Roach v. Henry, 186 Ark. 884 , 56 S.W. 2d 577 ; Missouri Pac. R. Co. v. McLendon, 185 Ark. 204 , 46 S.W. 2d 626 ; Schiele v. Dillard, 94 Ark. 277 , 126 S.W. 835 . … Catlett v. The Republican Party of Arkansas, 242 Ark. 283 , 413 S.W. 2d 651 ; Risor, Admx. v. Brown, 244 Ark. 663 , 426 S.W. 2d 810 . See also, Arkansas Savings & Loan Assn. Bd. v.

State v. Parker

39 Ark. 174 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 15, 1882

See State v. Denton, 14 Ark., 343; State v. Harrison, 19 ib., 565; State v. Stafford, 20 ib., 145; State v. Brown, 10 ib., 104; Gabe alias Santa Anna, 6 ib., 540. … Eor practice under this statute, see Mann v. State, 37 Ark., 405. The judgment must be reversed, and the cause remanded, with instructions to the court below to require defendant to plead to the indictment.

Spears v. State

264 Ark. 83 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 17, 1978

See Webb v. State, 154 Ark. 67 , 242 S.W. 380, 383 (opinion on rehearing). We did not apply it in Brown v. … This was pointed out in Rodriguez v. U.S., 227 F. 2d 912 (5 Cir., 1955), which was the authority for our holding in Brown. See also, State v. Hsie, supra.

Wisconsin & Arkansas Lumber Co. v. Thompson

87 Ark. 574 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 26, 1908

The essential facts in this case are the same as those in the case of Wisconsin & Arkansas Lumber Company v. Reaves, 82 Ark. 377 , and the principles there announced control here. … Co. v. Brown, 75 Ark. 137 . We do not think, however, that the language is susceptible of that interpretation.

Green v. Williams

169 Ark. 1198 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 14, 1925

See McCord v. Welch, 147 Ark. 362 . … Davis v. Road Imp. Dist., 162 Ark. 98 ; Massey v. Arkansas-Missouri Highway District in Pulaski County, 163 Ark. 63 .

Thompson v. State

330 Ark. 746 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 11, 1997

BROWN, Justice, concurring in part, dissenting in part. Since our decision in Walker v. … McClure v. State, 328 Ark. 35 , 942 S.W.2d 243 (1997)(Brown and Imber, JJ., concurring).

Barnett v. McCray

169 Ark. 833 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 16, 1925

The General Assembly of 1925, by act No. 21 of that session, abolished the board of commissioners of this district as created by the former statute, and created in succession a new board of commissioners to perfonmall of … Whittaker v. Watson, 68 Ark. 555 .

Holt v. Priest

326 Ark. 277 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 15, 1996

Therefore, we appoint the Honorable Gerald Brown as Master and direct him to conduct such proceedings and hearings subject to and in accordance with our Rule 6-5(a) and Rule 53, Arkansas Rules of Civil Procedure, as are necessary … Bailey v. McCuen, 319 Ark. 369 , 891 S.W.2d 797 (1995) (per curiam).

General Casualty Co. of America v. State

229 Ark. 485 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 13, 1958

Parsel v. Barnes, 25 Ark. 261 ; Jacoway v. Insurance Co., 49 Ark. 320 ; Liddell v. Sahline, 55 Ark. 627 ; Forrester-Duncan Land Co. v. Evatt, 90 Ark. 301 ; Brown v. Brown, 96 Ark. 456 . … Liddell v. Sahline, supra; Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Reynolds, 81 Ark. 202 ; Jonesboro, Lake City & Eastern Rd. Co. v. McClelland, 104 Ark. 150 .

City of Forrest City v. Bank of Forrest City

116 Ark. 377 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 18, 1915

We also think the language of our court in the case of Altheimer v. Board of Directors of Plum Bayou Levee Dist., 79 Ark. 229 , has a direct bearing on the questions of law raised by this appeal. … the board is authorized to borrow or not.

Norwood v. Allen

240 Ark. 232 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 7, 1966

The Horton Brown Corporation v. Goodhart, 233 F. 2d 23 (D. C. 1956). In the case at bar the remedy appellant now seeks was limited to three years after reaching her full age (18). Ark. Stat. Ann. … A 57-103—37-101—37-226; Brake v. Sides, 95 Ark. 74 , 128 S. W. 572 ; Cannon v. Price, 202 Ark. 464 , 150 S. W. 2d 755 .

Wofford v. Bettis

169 Ark. 487 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 12, 1925

appointed by said court,” Appellants contend that the expenses incurred should be paid by levy of taxes in accordance with section 24, and they rely, in support of that contention, on the decisions of this court in Netterer v. … Dist. v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., 157 Ark. 304 .

Purtle v. Committee On Professional Conduct

317 Ark. 278 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 6, 1994

Shuh v. Roberson, 302 Ark. 305 , 788 S.W.2d 740 (1990). Custody is generally not granted to someone other than the natural parent or parents absent a finding of lack of fitness of the natural parent. Feight v. … Corbin and Brown, JJ., and Ted Drake, Kaneaster Hodges and Ike Allen Laws, Special Justices, join. Darrell Brown, Special Justice, not participating in the final vote and the opinion.

Southern Surety Co. v. Dardanelle Road Improvement District No. 1

169 Ark. 755 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 2, 1925

Dist. v. … Co. v.

State Use Ashley County v. Riley.

194 Ark. 485 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 12, 1937

Harrod v. St. L. I. M. & S. Ry. Co., 98 Ark. 596 , 136 S. W. 974 ; Brown v. Norvell, 88 Ark. 590 , 115 S. W. 372 . To entitle a party to appeal there must have been a final decree rendered in the case. Foley v. … Goodwin v. Caraleigh Phosphate & Fertilizer Works, 123 N. C. 162 , 31 S. E. 373 ; Eastman v. Dunn, 75 Atl. Rep. 697 .

Road Improvement District No. 4 v. Ball

170 Ark. 522 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 22, 1926

Boyd v. Roane, 49 Ark. 397 ; McConnell v. Day, 61 Ark. 464 ; Clay v. Bilby, 72 Ark. 101 ; Jones v. Ainell, 123 Ark. 532 ; Lashbrook v. Tri-County Highway Imp. Dist., 152 Ark. 461 . … Ederheimer v. Carson Dry Goods Co., 105 Ark. 488 ; Lashbrook v. Tri-County Highway Imp. Dist., supra; Tri-County Highway Imp. Dist. v. Vincennes Bridge Co. ante p. 22; Howard-Sevier Rd. Imp. Dist. v. Hunt, 166 Ark. 62 .