Case law

Williams v. Ingram

320 Ark. 615 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 30, 1995

Sisson v. Ruby, 497 U.S. 358, 362 (1990). … In Southern v.

Barnett v. McCray

169 Ark. 833 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 16, 1925

The General Assembly of 1925, by act No. 21 of that session, abolished the board of commissioners of this district as created by the former statute, and created in succession a new board of commissioners to perfonmall of … Whittaker v. Watson, 68 Ark. 555 .

Cunningham v. Toye

97 Ark. 537 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 13, 1911

Hinkle v. Broadwater, 73 Ark. 489 ; Brown v. Wyandotte & Southeastern Ry. Co., 68 Ark. 134 ; Farmer v. First National Bank, 89 Ark. 132 . The testimony seems to be evenly balanced. … Litchworth v. Vaughan, 77 Ark. 305 . The preponderance must be against the finding of facts by the ohancellor, or else such finding must be upheld. Norman v. Pugh, 75 Ark. 52 ; J. H. McGill Lumber Co. v.

Fischel v. Mills

55 Ark. 344 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 23, 1892

Baldwin v. Scoggin, 15 Ark., supra; Ill. Central R. Co. v. Bosworth, 133 U. S., 92 . Say the Supreme Court of the U. S., in Knote v. U. S., 95 U. … See too Commonwealth v. Shick, 61 Pa. St., 495; Cope v. Com., 28 id., 297 ; Brown v. U. S., McCahon (Kas.), 229; In re Flournoy, 1 Kelly (Ga.), 606; Ill. Central R. Co. v. Bosworth, 133 U. S., sup.

City of Forrest City v. Bank of Forrest City

116 Ark. 377 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 18, 1915

We also think the language of our court in the case of Altheimer v. Board of Directors of Plum Bayou Levee Dist., 79 Ark. 229 , has a direct bearing on the questions of law raised by this appeal. … the board is authorized to borrow or not.

Wofford v. Bettis

169 Ark. 487 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 12, 1925

appointed by said court,” Appellants contend that the expenses incurred should be paid by levy of taxes in accordance with section 24, and they rely, in support of that contention, on the decisions of this court in Netterer v. … Dist. v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., 157 Ark. 304 .

Southern Surety Co. v. Dardanelle Road Improvement District No. 1

169 Ark. 755 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 2, 1925

Dist. v. … Co. v.

Fowler v. Unionaid Life Insurance

180 Ark. 140 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 14, 1929

Union v. Rowland, 177 Ark. 875 , 8 S. W. (2d) 452 ; 6 R. C. L. 837-8. … Mutual Relief Association v. Ray, 173 Ark. 9 , 292 S. W. 396 .

Lapham v. Head

21 Kan. 332 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 15, 1878

Stat. 184, §9; Moore v. McIntosh, 6 Kas. 39 ; Bell v. Parks, 18 Kas. 152 ; Fessler v. Haas, 19 Kas. 216 ; Wilson v. Webster, Morris (Iowa), 312; Stannard v. McCarty, Morris, 125; Hill v. Smith, Morris, 70; Freeman v. … Holliday, Morris, 80; Ellis v. Mosier, 2 G. Greene, 246; Pierson v. David, 1 Iowa, 23 ; Spry v. Sleppy, 15 Iowa, 409 ; Clark v. Shultz, 4 Mo. 235 ; Stubblefield v. Branson, 20 Mo. 301 ; Welch v.

General Casualty Co. of America v. State

229 Ark. 485 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 13, 1958

Parsel v. Barnes, 25 Ark. 261 ; Jacoway v. Insurance Co., 49 Ark. 320 ; Liddell v. Sahline, 55 Ark. 627 ; Forrester-Duncan Land Co. v. Evatt, 90 Ark. 301 ; Brown v. Brown, 96 Ark. 456 . … Liddell v. Sahline, supra; Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Reynolds, 81 Ark. 202 ; Jonesboro, Lake City & Eastern Rd. Co. v. McClelland, 104 Ark. 150 .

Bethune v. Bethune

192 Ark. 811 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 1, 1936

Ryder v. Ryder, 2 Cal. Ct. App. (2d) 426, 37 Pacific (2d) 1069. … Appellant urges that this award was, in effect, an allowance of alimony in gross, and as such cannot be sustained under the rule announced in Brown v. Brown, 38 Ark. 324 ; Walker v. Walker, 147 Ark. 376 , 227 S.

Maxwell v. State

216 Ark. 393 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 9, 1950

Smith v. State, 181 Ark. 592 , 26 S. W. 2d 899 ; Brickey v. State, 148 Ark. 595 , 231 S. W. 549 . We do not impair these holdings. Nor are we unmindful of the trial Court’s difficult position. … Lyle Brown, one of the attorneys, is Mayor of Hope. John P. Vesey, another defense lawyer, was City Attorney.

Sturdy v. Hall, Secretary of State

201 Ark. 38 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 14, 1940

McNary, District Attorney v. … I do not insist here that as to the Browns either name is valid.

The C. M. Farmer Stave Heading Co. v. Whorton

193 Ark. 708 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 1, 1937

Van Buren v. Lawson, 160 Ark. 631 , 255 S. W. 295 ; Lawson v. Road Imp. Dist., 163 Ark. 303 , 259 S. W. 747 . … Johnson v. Commonwealth B. & L. Ass’n, 182 Ark. 226 , 31 S. W. (2d) 136 ; Holcomb v. American Surety Co., 184 Ark. 449 , 42 S. W. (2d) 765 .

Pulaski County v. National Old Line Insurance

210 Ark. 138 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 20, 1946

This is a companion case to No. 4-7898, Pulaski County, et al., v. Commercial National Bank, et al., ante, p. 124, 194 S. W. 2d 883 , this day decided, and the decision in that case is controlling here. … The Equalization Board denied any increases, and appellants appealed to the county court which affirmed the action of the Equalization Board and granted an appeal to the circuit court.

Hendrick v. Hendrick

180 Ark. 550 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 2, 1929

Appellant testified that appellee gave him this money, and claimed credit for boarding and caring for him, although he admits that there was no contract or agreement for appellee to pay board, and appellee stated that he … Bennett v. Snyder, 147 Ark. 206 , 227 S. W. 402 ; Henson v. Strickland, 152 Ark. 203 , 238 S. W. 5 , 21 A. L. R. 328; Jenkins v. International Life Ins. Co., 149 Ark. 257 , 232 S. W. 3 .

Waldrop v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.

131 Ark. 453 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 10, 1917

Vestal v. Little Rock, 54 Ark. 321 ; City of Covington v. Southgate, 15 B. Monroe (Ky.) 491, and Morford v. Unger, 8 Ia. 82 . … It was, therefore, held that the action of the board furnished no foundation for the estoppel claimed.

Hospital & Benevolent Ass'n v. Arkansas Baptist State Convention

176 Ark. 946 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 9, 1928

the case of American Bonding Co. v. … The case of Common Sense Mining & Milling Co. v. Taylor, 152 S.

Rundell v. Rogers

144 Ark. 293 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 31, 1920

Delaney v. Jackson, 95 Ark. 131 ; Jones v. Felker, 72 Ark. 405 ; Brown v. Dwight Mfg. Co., L. R. A. 1917 F, 997; 16 R. C. L. 1030, sec. 552, n. 18; 18 Am. & Eng. Enc. of Law 215, 4a. … Co. v. Wirbel, 108 Ark. 437 ; Ward Furn. Mfg. Co. v. Isbell, 81 Ark. 549 . The testimony concerning the local custom was, therefore, incompetent and the court erred in admitting it.

Holt v. Priest

326 Ark. 277 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 15, 1996

Therefore, we appoint the Honorable Gerald Brown as Master and direct him to conduct such proceedings and hearings subject to and in accordance with our Rule 6-5(a) and Rule 53, Arkansas Rules of Civil Procedure, as are necessary … Bailey v. McCuen, 319 Ark. 369 , 891 S.W.2d 797 (1995) (per curiam).