Case law

Rickman v. Mobbs

253 Ark. 969 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 12, 1973

Moore v. Adams, supra. … Moore v. Adams, supra.

Texarkana v. Leach

66 Ark. 40 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 17, 1898

Draper v. Mackey, 35 Ark. 497 ; Wesson v. Washburn Iron Co., 13 Allen, 95 ; S. C. 90 Am. Dec. 181 ; Snell v. Buresh, 123 Ill. 151 ; Corning v. Lowerre, 6 Johns. Ch. 439 ; Keystone Bridge Co. v. Summers, 13 W. … Dec. 314 , 321; Brown v. Watson, 47 Me. 161 ; S. C. 74 Am. Dec. 482 ; 2 Wood, Nuisances (3 Ed.) §§ 663, 669, 670, 672, 674, 676-680. Let the decree of the Miller circuit court be affirmed.

Snetzer v. Gregg

129 Ark. 542 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 25, 1917

of assessors, and shall file said list with the secretary of said board of directors.” … Excelsior Planting & Manufacturing Co. v. Green, Collector, 39 La. Ann. 455 ; Board of Commissioners v. Mialegvich, 52 La. Ann. 1292 .

State v. Jones

322 Ark. 32 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 9, 1995

Also cited is State v. Browning, 206 Ark. 791 , 178 S.W.2d 77 (1944), in which we entertained the State’s appeal of questions concerning admissibility of a confession of one accused of a crime. … In State v.

Arkansas Employment Security Division v. National Baptist Convention U.S.A., Inc.

275 Ark. 374 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 29, 1982

The decision of the Board of Review was affirmed by the circuit court, but reversed by the Court of Appeals. National Baptist Convention v. Ark. Employment Security Division, 3 Ark. App. 189 , 623 S.W. 2d 852 (1981). … The Convention’s governing board appoints a three-member commission to supervise the Hot Springs establishment.

Beavers v. Security Mutual Insurance

76 Ark. 595 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 21, 1905

Co. v. Brown, 75 Ark. 251 . The law is well settled that the insurer is liable, even though the negligent act of the insured or his servants be the proximate cause of the damage through the fire. … Co. v. Lawrence, 10 Pet. 507 ; Mickey v. Burlington Insurance Co., 35 Iowa, 174 .

Ford Motor Co. v. Massey

313 Ark. 345 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 1, 1993

Brown, Justice. … In Little v.

Ellison v. Tubb

295 Ark. 312 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 2, 1988

In Robards v. … Robards v. Brown, 40 Ark. 423 (1883). Thus, it must be presumed that they contracted with reference to Act 746, and that the appellant was aware of the new procedure to perfect a lien.

Oliphant v. Hamm

167 Ark. 167 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 12, 1925

Millsaps v. Brogdon, 97 Ark. 469 ; Minor v. Mapes, 102 Ark. 351 ; Carter v. Brown, 136 Ark. 23 ; and Brashears v. Arnett, 144 Ark. 196 . … Smith Construction Co. v. Tate, 151 Ark. 278 , and Dubisson v. McMullin, 163 Ark. 186 .

Johnson v. State

374 Ark. 219 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 11, 2008

Brown v. State, 373 Ark. 453 , 284 S.W.3d 481 (2008) (per curiam). However, good cause must be shown to grant the motion. Strom v.

Tackett v. Hess

291 Ark. 239 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 16, 1987

In 1983, the city board passed Ordinance No. 14,395 which provided for a “short form planned unit development process.” … Locke v. Cook, 245 Ark. 787 , 434 S.W.2d 598 (1968).

London & Lancashire Fire Insurance v. Ludwig

86 Ark. 581 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 15, 1908

In Commercial Fire Insurance Co. v. … In Sanger v. Upton, 91 U. S. 60 , it is said: “The capital stock of an incorporated company is a fund set apart for the payment of its debts.

Knowlton v. Ward

318 Ark. 867 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 5, 1994

Gazaway v. Greene County Equalization Board, 314 Ark. 569 , 864 S.W.2d 233 (1993); Faubus v. Kinney, 239 Ark. 443 , 389 S.W.2d 887 (1965). … Gipson v. Maner and Gibson v. Young, 225 Ark. 976, 980 , 287 S.W.2d 467 (1956).

International Paper Co. v. Warnix

237 Ark. 938 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 6, 1964

A similar controversy between appellee and appellant’s predecessor in title was involved in a prior suit, Brown Paper Mill Co., v. Warnix, 222 Ark. 417 , 259 S. W. 2d 495 . … The trial court erred in refusing to recognize the line as determined in Brown Paper Mill Co. Inc. v. Warnix, supra.” Both parties seem to be under the misapprehension that this court adopted a line in the Brown case.

Jordan v. Muse

88 Ark. 587 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 4, 1909

Brearley v. Norris, 23 Ark. 169 ; Hicks v. Brown, 38 Ark. 469 . It is further contended that the judgment was a joint one against appellant and one Nelson, and that he could not be sued, on it without joining Nelson. … Peel v. January, 35 Ark. 331 ; Mills v. Duryee, 7 Cranch, 480 ; McElmoyle v. Cohen, 13 Pet. 312 ; Christmas v. Russell, 5 Wall. 290 .

Thatcher v. Franklin

37 Ark. 64 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 15, 1881

Clayton v. Johnson, 36 Ark., 406. -: sites6<xf.ui To maintain replevin for goods, the plaintiff must not only have title, general or special, in them, but must be entitled to immediate possession thereof. … Gantt’s Digest, sec. 5035; Beebe v. DeBaun, 8 Ark., 510; Wallace v. Brown, 17 Ib., 450. This case differs from the case of Clayton v. Johnson, sup.

Hale v. Southwest Arkansas Water District

244 Ark. 647 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 15, 1968

Graham v. St. Louis I. M. & S. R. Co., 69 Ark. 562 , 65 S. W. 1048 , 66 S. W. 344 (1901). By limiting the eminent domain to an easement, appellants have the security pointed out in Railway Co. v. … Brown, J., not participating.

Howell v. Hogins

37 Ark. 110 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 15, 1881

Hawkins v. Filkins, 24 Ark., 286; Hendry v. Cline, 29 Ark., 414; Berry v. Bellows, 30 Ark., 198; State, use, &c. v. Brown, Ib., 761; Texas v. White, 7 Wall, 700; City Richmond v. Smith, 15 Wall, 429; Horn v. … Daniel v.

Pardo v. Creamer

228 Ark. 746 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 24, 1958

The question arose again more recently in Dean v. Brown, 216 Ark. 761 , 227 S. … Dean v. Brown, supra. Appellant also contends that the petition for adoption and its recordation constituted a declaration of heirship by J. F.

Broadway-Main Street Bridge District v. Mortgage Loan & Insurance Agency, Inc.

195 Ark. 390 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 17, 1938

In Earle Road Improvement District No. 6 v. Johnson, 145 Ark. 438 , 224 S. … Thereafter, the board,, at its. discretion, may order an annual “ adjustment or reassessment of benefits to be made by the assessors.” It seems clear that this is a discretion vested in the hoard.