Case law

Mitchell v. State

230 Ark. 894 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 21, 1959

The law on that point was settled in State v. Browning, 206 Ark. 791 , 178 S. W. 2d 77 . Appellant complains of the argument made in the case by the prosecuting attorney. … Jenkins v. State, 222 Ark. 511 , 261 S. W. 2d 784 .

Pomtree v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

353 Ark. 657 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 19, 2003

See Crockett & Brown, P.A. v. Wilson, 321 Ark. 150 , 901 S.W.2d 826 (1995). When a trial court determines that a violation of Rule 11 has occurred, the Rule makes sanctions mandatory. Id. … Crockett & Brown, supra.

Villines v. Harris

362 Ark. 393 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 19, 2005

Election Comm’rs of Lonoke County v. Waggoner, 190 Ark. 341 , 78 S.W.2d 821 (1935). Actions for deprivation of constitutional rights are tried in circuit court. See, e.g., Brown v. … Corbin, Brown and Imber, JJ., not participating.

Lockett v. State

271 Ark. 860 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 9, 1981

Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 411 U.S. 778 (1973); Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471 (1972). … Wickes v. State, 270 Ark. 781 , 606 S.W. 2d 366 (1980); Hawkins v. State, 270 Ark. 1016 , 607 S.W. 2d 400 (Ark. App., 1980). Affirmed.

VanWagoner v. Beverly Enterprises

334 Ark. 12 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 2, 1998

See also Cherry v. Tanda, 327 Ark. 600, 616 , 940 S.W.2d 457, 462 (1997), quoting Helms v. … See Angle v. Alexander, 328 Ark. 714, 719 , 945 S.W.2d 933 (1997)(citing Miller v.

In re Dodrill

260 Ark. 223 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 12, 1976

Hurst v. Bar Rules Committee of the State of Arkansas, 202 Ark. 1101 , 155 S.W. 2d 697 (1941). … Further, as to jurisdiction, it was succinctly said in Feldman v.

Schmidt v. Drainage District No. 17

140 Ark. 541 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 17, 1919

The complaint also alleges that the board of directors of the drainage district failed to view and assess the damages to his lands as provided by section 9 of Act 103 of the Acts of 1917. … A statute in all respects similar to the one now under consideration was upheld by this court in Dickerson v. Tri-County Drainage Dist., 138 Ark. 471 .

Brashears v. State

203 Ark. 1014 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 16, 1942

White v. McCracken, 60 Ark. 613 , 31 S. W. 882 ; Fordyce v. Jackson, 56 Ark. 594 , 20 S. W. 528 .” See, also, Holt v. State, 47 Ark. 196 , 1 S. W. 61 ; Lackey v. State, 67 Ark. 416 , 55 S. W. 213 ; Vassar v. … Osburn v. State, 181 Ark. 661 , 27 S.

Cottrell v. Faubus

233 Ark. 721 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 5, 1961

And in Palmore v. … In Fletcher v.

Thatcher v. Franklin

37 Ark. 64 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 15, 1881

Clayton v. Johnson, 36 Ark., 406. -: sites6<xf.ui To maintain replevin for goods, the plaintiff must not only have title, general or special, in them, but must be entitled to immediate possession thereof. … Gantt’s Digest, sec. 5035; Beebe v. DeBaun, 8 Ark., 510; Wallace v. Brown, 17 Ib., 450. This case differs from the case of Clayton v. Johnson, sup.

Williams v. Ingram

320 Ark. 615 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 30, 1995

Sisson v. Ruby, 497 U.S. 358, 362 (1990). … In Southern v.

Burton v. State

327 Ark. 65 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 21, 1997

Brown, Justice. Following a bench trial, appellant Willie Burton was convicted of aggravated assault and felon-in-possession-of-a-firearm. … Wallace v. State, 326 Ark. 376 , 931 S.W.2d 113 (1996); Brown v. State, 326 Ark. 56 , 931 S.W.2d 80 (1996).

Smith v. Garretson

176 Ark. 834 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 2, 1928

See Evans v. Pettus, 112 Ark. 572 , 166 S. W. 955 ; Moore v. Exelby, 170 Ark. 908 , 181 S. W. 671 . … Co. v. Smith, 60 Ark. 221 -240, 29 S.

Robinson v. Sanitarium

149 Ark. 355 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 27, 1921

Wilkins v. Eanes, 126 Ark. 339 -340-342. … Taliaferro v. Boyd, 115 Ark. 297 ; Grant v. Led-widge, 109 Ark. 297 .

Johnson v. Missouri Pacific Railroad

139 Ark. 507 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 2, 1919

In Davis v. … Wildey v. Crane, 63 Mich. 720 , 30 N. W. 327 , and Lehman v. Detroit etc. R. Co. (Mich.), 147 N. W. 628 . In Brown v. Bigne (Ore.), 27 Pac. 11 , 28 A. S. R. 752, 14 L. R.

Tucker v. State

261 Ark. 505 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 25, 1977

Greenwood v. State, supra. Brown v. State, supra. … Brown v. State, supra.

Burton v. Drainage District No. 7

187 Ark. 193 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 10, 1933

Later in the same year plaintiff had an oral understanding with the district board to the effect that the board would complete the levees and adjust the assessments, and plaintiff authorized the dismissal of his suit. … Plaintiffs below, appellants here, cite and rely upon the case of Prothro v. Williams, 147 Ark. 535 , 229 S. W. 38 , as authorizing this suit.

Rackley v. State

2014 Ark. 39 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 30, 2014

Johnson v. State, 356 Ark. 534, 157 S.W.3d 151 (2004); Howard v. State, 367 Ark. 18, 238 S.W.3d 24 (2006). … Then after that phone conversation, we went down to Bobby Brown’s, to the investigator’s office and [T.W.] made her statement to Investigator Brown. Ms.

Urquhart v. State

180 Ark. 937 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 27, 1930

The case of Jobe v. Urquhart, 102 Ark. 470 , 143 S. W. 121 , Ann. … In the case of State v. Sloan, 66 Ark. 575 , 53 S. W. 47 , 74 Am. St.

Williams v. Martin

335 Ark. 163 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 19, 1998

Crockett & Brown v. Wilson, 321 Ark. 150 , 901 S.W.2d 826 (1995). Arkansas Rule of Civil Procedure 11 applies to “every pleading, motion, and other paper of a party represented by an attorney.” (Emphasis added.) … We have held in Crockett & Brown, P.A. v. Wilson, 321 Ark. 150 , 901 S.W.2d 826 (1995), that under Ark. R. Civ.