Case law

Arkadelphia Cotton Mills v. Trimble

54 Ark. 316 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 14, 1891

Co. v. Wellington, 113 Mass., 79 ; Penobscot & Kennebec R. Co. v. Bartlett, 12 Gray, 244 ; Bucksport, etc., R. Co. v. Back, 65 Me., 536; Boston & Albany R. Co. v. … But, on the contrary, the' manifest understanding was that he should pay on his shares as the board of directors should ascertain and determine that the money he agreed to pay was needed. Nutter v.

White v. Perry

348 Ark. 675 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 16, 2002

See Brown v. St. Paul Mercury Ins. Co., 300 Ark. 241 , 778 S.W.2d 610 (1989); Duty v. Watkins, supra. … In Brown v. St. Paul Mercury Ins. Co., supra, we held similarly when the trial court granted an order of dismissal in the face of the plaintiff s move to nonsuit.

Lawrence v. City of Texarkana

378 S.W.3d 127 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 9, 2011

Lawrence v. City of Texarkana, 364 Ark. 466 , 221 S.W.3d 370 (2006). … Comm’n v. Bass, 252 Ark. 178 , 477 S.W.2d 842 (1972).

Robertson v. State

252 Ark. 333 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 17, 1972

Lyle Brown, Justice. This is an appeal under our criminal procedure rule one. Robertson was sentenced to five years in the penitentiary. … Grayer v. State, 242 Ark. 640 , 414 S.W. 2d 870 (1967).

Arkansas Department of Human Services v. April Ward and Minor Child

2026 Ark. 17 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 5, 2026

CV-25-758 Opinion Delivered: February 5, 2026 ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES PETITIONER V. … See Crockett & Brown, P.A. v. Wilson, 321 Ark. 150, 154, 901 S.W.2d 826, 828 (1995). We recognize that the expedited matter coincided with McClain’s genuine personal hardships.

Scales v. Scales

167 Ark. 298 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 19, 1925

Simpkins v. Simpkins, 136 Ark. 588 ; Pryor v. Pryor, 151 Ark. 150 ; and Davis v. Davis, 163 Ark. 263 . … Jim Tom Barnett, who was boarding with them. It is also inferable from the testimony of Hazel Graves that they quarreled about a man who had been boarding there, and who had p'aid them six dollars.

Raney v. Raulston

238 Ark. 875 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 11, 1965

In other words, the “nursing home” facility is not simply a “boarding home,” and may not be used as such; board is only incidental to the other services rendered. … In Hollis v. Erwin, County Judge, 237 Ark. 605 , 374 S.

Knowlton v. Ward

318 Ark. 867 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 5, 1994

Gazaway v. Greene County Equalization Board, 314 Ark. 569 , 864 S.W.2d 233 (1993); Faubus v. Kinney, 239 Ark. 443 , 389 S.W.2d 887 (1965). … Gipson v. Maner and Gibson v. Young, 225 Ark. 976, 980 , 287 S.W.2d 467 (1956).

Rainwater v. State

302 Ark. 492 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 18, 1990

Second, in citing Rule 13.1 (b), appellant limits his reliance on language contained in the Rule which codifies the two-prong test of Aguilar v. … Illinois v.

Bordwell v. State

77 Ark. 161 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 2, 1905

State v. Doss, 70 Ark. 312 ; Viefhaus v. State, 71 Ark. 419 . … Kirby’s Digest, § § 5118-5120; Doss v. Moore, 69 Ark. 258 ; Wallace v. Cubanola, 70 Ark. 395 .

Commissioner of Labor v. Renfroe

253 Ark. 380 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 30, 1972

Nelson v. Review Board of Indiana Employment Security Division, 119 Ind. App. 10 , 82 N.E.2d 523 (1948); 2 Turner v. Boise Lodge No. 310, 77 Idaho 465 , 295 P.2d 256 (1956). … Francis Levee District, 226 Ark. 545 , 291 S.W.2d 254 , where we cited Retirement Board of Allegheny County v. McGovern, 316 Pa. 161 , 174 A. 400 (1934), which made the exact distinction applied in Ledwith.

Freeze v. Improvement District No. 16

126 Ark. 172 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 13, 1916

Therefore, according to Katzenstein v. Little Rock, supra, all is adjoining the locality to be affected.” Again, in the case of Board of Improvement v. … On that point the ease is ruled • by Boles v. Kelley, 90 Ark. 29 , and Board of Improvement v. Offenhauser, supra. Other points of attack are not of sufficient importance to call for discussion.

Beavers v. Security Mutual Insurance

76 Ark. 595 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 21, 1905

Co. v. Brown, 75 Ark. 251 . The law is well settled that the insurer is liable, even though the negligent act of the insured or his servants be the proximate cause of the damage through the fire. … Co. v. Lawrence, 10 Pet. 507 ; Mickey v. Burlington Insurance Co., 35 Iowa, 174 .

Weyerhaeuser Co. v. McGinnis

37 Ark. App. 91 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 19, 1992

Code Ann. § 11 -9-522(b); Glass v. Edens, 233 Ark. 786 , 346 S.W.2d 685 (1961). … See Bragg v. Evans-St. Clair, Inc., 15 Ark. App. 53 , 688 S.W.2d 956 (1985).

Davis v. Kemp

252 Ark. 925 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 26, 1972

Lyle Brown, Justice. This is a medical malpractice case. Ruby Davis brought suit for personal injuries and her husband sued for loss of services. The trial court directed a verdict for Dr. … Graham v. Sisco, 248 Ark. 6 , 449 S.W. 2d 949 (1970): The necessity for the introduction of expert medical testimony in malpractice cases was exhaustively considered in Lanier v. Trammell, 207 Ark. 372 , 180 S.

City of Fort Smith v. Hairston

196 Ark. 1005 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 24, 1938

We have been cited to the case of Buckley v. Roche, 214 Cal. 241 , 4 P. 2d 929 , as authority to support the circuit court judgment. We do not reach this conclusion. … Bourland v. Pollock, 157 Ark. 538 , 249 S. W. 360 ; Shofner v. Dowell, 168 Ark. 229 , 269 S. W. 588 , 987.

National Bank of Commerce v. Quirk

325 Ark. 31 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 3, 1996

S.D. 1995); Steffens v. Paramount Properties, Inc., 667 S.W.2d 725 (Mo. App. E.D. 1984); see also 5 Am. Jur. 2d, Appellate Review § 935 (1995). … Dudley, Glaze, and Brown, JJ., not participating. Special Justices JAMES McLARTY and W. KELVIN WYRICK would award the entire amount requested by the appellants.

Pine Bluff National Bank v. Kesterson

257 Ark. 813 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 17, 1975

The allegations relating to ratification by the Cemetery Board were that this board had authorized the third party defendant Arkansas Memorial Gardens, Inc. … Huber Glass Co. v. First National Bank of Kenosha, 29 Wis. 2d 106 (1965), 138 N.W. 2d 157 (1965); Morgan v.

Kitchens v. Ark. Appraisal Service

233 Ark. 384 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 3, 1961

It shall also be the duty of the County Equalization Boards, in performing their duties, to recognize and follow such manuals and standards, and the County Equalization Boards shall not change an assessment made by the County … Fort Smith Gas Co. v. Kincannon, 202 Ark. 216 , 150 S. W. 2d 968 . Assuming that the language used is mandatory, we think that the appellees have complied with the language.

Miller v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.

129 Ark. 217 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 21, 1917

Haglin v. Atkinson-Williams Hardware Co., 93 Ark. 85 ; Reeves v. Hot Springs, 103 Ark. 430 ; Brown v. Hardy, 95 Ark. 123 ; Wallace v. St. L., I. M. & S. Ry. Co., 83 Ark. 359 ; St. L., I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v.