Case law

Bagley v. Fletcher

44 Ark. 153 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 15, 1884

McGan v. Marshall, 7 Humphreys, 121. In Bozman v. Browning, 31 Ark., 364, an infant whose domicile was in Alabama sold his lands in Arkansas to-his brother. … Law Jour., 127, and cases cited; among others, Brown v. Jackson, 3 Wheaton, 448 ; Kyle v. Kavanaugh, 103 Mass., 359 ; Pray v. Pierce, 7 Mass., 381 ; Jackson v. Fish, 10 Johns., 456 ; Hall v. Ashby, 9 Ohio, 96.

Anthony v. the Western Southern Life Ins. Co.

198 Ark. 445 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 29, 1939

In the case of Edwards v. Lodge, 195 Ark. 470 , 113 S. … In the recent case of Hirsch v. Dabbs and Schuman v. Mivelaz, 197 Ark. 756 , 126 S.

St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Hall

71 Ark. 302 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 21, 1903

Browne, Statute of Frauds, § 135. What right had the plaintiff to sue ? He was a tenant at will. … Seely v. Alden, 6 Pa. St. 302.

McCullough v. McCullough

222 Ark. 390 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 6, 1953

Brown v. Brown, 160 Tenn. 685 , 28 S. W. 2d 350 . McCullough has remarried. He and his wife are employed by Firestone Tire & Rubber Company. McCullough’s take-home pay is between $100 and $120 a week.

Smith v. Ridgeview Baptist Church, Inc.

257 Ark. 139 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 21, 1974

Therefore, the appellant Board’s “Regulation #124” (as authorized by Ark. Stat. … Appellee vigorously asserts that Matthews was overruled either specifically or by implication in Pope v. Pope, 213 Ark. 321 , 210 S.W. 2d 319 (1948). (See also Howell v. Howell; Stevens v.

Pine Bluff National Bank v. Kesterson

257 Ark. 813 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 17, 1975

The allegations relating to ratification by the Cemetery Board were that this board had authorized the third party defendant Arkansas Memorial Gardens, Inc. … Huber Glass Co. v. First National Bank of Kenosha, 29 Wis. 2d 106 (1965), 138 N.W. 2d 157 (1965); Morgan v.

Crockett Motor Co. v. Thompson

177 Ark. 495 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 4, 1928

Louis Ry. v. Hall, 44 Ark. 375 ; Meddock v. Williams, 91 Ark. 93 , 120 S. W. 842 . Error was not committed in allowing the plea of minority and disaffirmance of the contract in the circuit court. … Appellant cites the cases of Bozeman v. Browning, 31 Ark. 364 , and Cooper v. State, 37 Ark. 421 , in support of this contention. Neither case has any application to the point involved here.

Bennett v. City of Hope

204 Ark. 147 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 21, 1942

Willis v. City of Fort Smith, 121 Ark. 606 , 182 S. W. 275 ; Bain v. Fort Smith Light & Traction Co., 116 Ark. 125 , 172 S. W. 843 , L. R. A. 1915D, 1021; Morrilton Waterworks Imp. Dist. v. Earl, 71 Ark. 4 , 69 S. … This court in Martin v. Hilb, 53 Ark. 300 , 14 S.

Higgs v. State

313 Ark. 272 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 24, 1993

Brown v. State, 309 Ark. 503 , 832 S.W.2d 477 (1992). In determining whether there was substantial evidence to support the verdict, we review the evidence in the light most favorable to the appellee. Id. … See Webber v. State, 15 Ark. App. 261 , 692 S.W.2d 255 (1985). The fact that an accused is only the agent of a buyer or seller of drugs does not remove the transfer from the ambit of the statute. Parker v.

Raney v. Raulston

238 Ark. 875 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 11, 1965

In other words, the “nursing home” facility is not simply a “boarding home,” and may not be used as such; board is only incidental to the other services rendered. … In Hollis v. Erwin, County Judge, 237 Ark. 605 , 374 S.

Arkadelphia Cotton Mills v. Trimble

54 Ark. 316 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 14, 1891

Co. v. Wellington, 113 Mass., 79 ; Penobscot & Kennebec R. Co. v. Bartlett, 12 Gray, 244 ; Bucksport, etc., R. Co. v. Back, 65 Me., 536; Boston & Albany R. Co. v. … But, on the contrary, the' manifest understanding was that he should pay on his shares as the board of directors should ascertain and determine that the money he agreed to pay was needed. Nutter v.

Pigg v. Ashley County Newspaper, Inc.

253 Ark. 756 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 15, 1973

Skaggs v. Johnson, 105 Ark. 254 , 150 S.W. 1036 (1912). … Comes v. Cruce, 85 Ark. 79 , 107 S.W. 185 (1908). The article made several charges against Crossett policemen as a class.

Curtis & Lane v. Flinn

46 Ark. 70 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 15, 1885

Mortg., sec. 86; Herman ib., sec. 57; Carnall v. Duval, 22 Ark., 136; Jarrett v. McDaniel, 32 ib., 598; Fetes v. O’Laughlin, 62 Iowa, 532 ; Lashbrook v. Hathaway, 52 Mich., 124 ; Michigan Ins. Co. v. … Brown, 11 ib., 265; Page v. Ordway, 40 N. H., 253; Machette v. Wauless, 1 Col., 225 .

Burton & Townsend v. Baird & Bright

44 Ark. 556 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 15, 1884

State v. … Hempst., 215; Bozeman v. Browning, 31 Ark., 365; Wallace v. State, 28 Ib., 531; Moore v. Maxwell, 18 Ib., 469; George v. Norris, 23 Ib., 121. 3.practice in Supreme court. w li © n judgment ¡Jtoie r«- Affirmed.

Rockefeller v. Hogue

244 Ark. 1029 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 27, 1968

Etzler v. Brown, 58 Fla. 221 , 50 So. 416 (1909); Emerson v. Hughes, 117 Vt. 270 , 90 A. 2d 910 , 34 ALR 2d 539 (1952); Farish v. Young, 18 Ariz. 298 , 158 Pac. 845 , (1916); State v. Frazier, 47 N. D. 314 , 182 N. … In short, any officer, board, tribunal or agency having the power to remove, for cause, an officer serving a fixed term acts in a quasi-judicial capacity in conducting a hearing and the procedure must be of a quasi-judicial

White v. Lewis

253 Ark. 476 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 27, 1972

Lyle Brown, Justice. This suit was instituted by appellee Carl L. … Appellants contend there is uncertainty in the language of the covenant and therefore freedom of restraint should be decreed, relying on Hays v. Watson, 250 Ark. 589 , 466 S.W. 2d 272 (1971).

Commissioner of Labor v. Renfroe

253 Ark. 380 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 30, 1972

Nelson v. Review Board of Indiana Employment Security Division, 119 Ind. App. 10 , 82 N.E.2d 523 (1948); 2 Turner v. Boise Lodge No. 310, 77 Idaho 465 , 295 P.2d 256 (1956). … Francis Levee District, 226 Ark. 545 , 291 S.W.2d 254 , where we cited Retirement Board of Allegheny County v. McGovern, 316 Pa. 161 , 174 A. 400 (1934), which made the exact distinction applied in Ledwith.

Garland Levee District v. Hutt

207 Ark. 784 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 23, 1944

S. 886; Patterson Orchard Company v. Southwest Arkansas Utilities Corporation, 179 Ark. 1029 , 18 S. W. 2d 1028 , 65 A. L. R, 1446; State Highway Commission v. Saline County, 205 Ark. 860 , 171 S. W. 2d 60 . … Miller Levee District No. 2 v. Wright, 195 Ark. 295 , 111 S. W. 2d 469 .

Freeze v. Improvement District No. 16

126 Ark. 172 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 13, 1916

Therefore, according to Katzenstein v. Little Rock, supra, all is adjoining the locality to be affected.” Again, in the case of Board of Improvement v. … On that point the ease is ruled • by Boles v. Kelley, 90 Ark. 29 , and Board of Improvement v. Offenhauser, supra. Other points of attack are not of sufficient importance to call for discussion.

Kinnear v. Langley

209 Ark. 878 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 11, 1946

The case of Brown v. Nelms, 86 Ark. 368 , 112 S. W. 373 , was decided by this court in 1908, and has become a landmark in the application of our pretermitted child statute. … In Brown v. Nelms, this court cited Gerrish v. Gerrish, supra, as follows (l. c. 388): “The Supreme Court of Oregon in Gerrish v. Gerrish, 8 Ore. 351 , 34 Am.