Case law

Western Union Telegraph Co. v. McMullin

98 Ark. 347 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 20, 1911

It is conceded that both James Clark and appellee were boarding at houses within the free delivery limits of appellee. … Co. v. Sockwell, 91 Ark. 475 . 2.

LA Green Seed Company of Arkansas v. Williams

246 Ark. 463 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 24, 1969

were grown as being “Green’s Pink Shipper” tomato seed, when, in fact, it was some unknown variety of tomato seed which produced an inferior tomato; that appellant expressly and impliedly warranted to appellee, through Brown … Texilon Co., 166 N.Y.S. 2d 838 (1957); Hellenbrand v. Bowar, 16 Wis. 2d 264 , 114 N.W. 2d 418 (1962); Nekuda v. Allis-Chalmers Mfg. Co., 175 Neb. 396 , 121 N.W. 2d 819 (1963); Salecki v.

Woodard v. Wabbaseka-Tucker Public School District

286 Ark. 110 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 20, 1985

The Act protects the right of renewal of a contract between a teacher and the Board of Directors of a school district. … If the School Board action is supported by rational reasons and does not discriminate for the foregoing reasons the appellant’s rights are not violated. Lamar School District #39 v.

Ragon v. Great American Indemnity Co.

224 Ark. 387 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 20, 1954

Ass’n v. Building & Const. Trades (9th C. C. A.), 178 Fed. 2d 175; Tower Realty v. City of E. Detroit (6th C. C. A.), 196 Fed. 2d 710; Hoosier Cas. Co. v. Fox (Dist. Ct. Iowa), 102 Fed. … of that (Workmen’s Compensation) Board.

Combs v. City of Springdale

366 Ark. 31 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 23, 2006

In Green v. … In Serna v.

Loewer v. Lonoke Rice Milling Co.

111 Ark. 62 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 15, 1913

Roberts v. Totten, 13 Ark. 609 ; Lawrence v. Ellsworth, 41 Ark. 502 ; Weed v. Dyer, 53 Ark. 155 ; Lanier v. Union Mortgage Banking & Tr. Co., 64 Ark. 39 ; Fletcher v. Whitlow, 72 Ark. 234 -240; 1 Cyc. pp. 460-467. … The board did direct him to pay more than ninety cents for other crops.

Bagley v. State

247 Ark. 113 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 15, 1969

Lyle Brown, Justice. Appellant Emery Berryman Bagley was convicted of first degree murder and sentenced to death. … Brown v. State, 231 Ark. 363 , 329 S. W. 2d 521 (1959). Yet, each case is governed by its own record and the law applicable to that record.

Lindsey v. City of Fayetteville

256 Ark. 352 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 1, 1974

Also, there is a presumption that the board acted in a fair, just and reasonable manner. Economy Wholesale Co., Inc. v. Rodgers, 232 Ark. 835 , 340 S.W. 2d 583 (1960). In the instant case, we must affirm. … In McKinney v.

Boyle v. A.W.A., Inc.

319 Ark. 390 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 6, 1995

Brown, Justice. … Black’s Law Dictionary, p. 375 (6th Ed. 1990); Brown v. Minor, 305 Ark. 556 , 810 S.W.2d 334 (1991).

Jones v. Dillard

70 Ark. 69 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 4, 1902

Stanley v. Snyder, 43 Ark. 249 ; Carmack v. Lovett, 44 Ark. 180 ; Bogan v. Cleveland, 52 Ark. 101 , 12 S. W. 159 ; Davis v. Day, 56 Ark. 156 , 19 S. W. 502 ; Crampton v. Schaap, 56 Ark. 253 , 19 S. W. 669 ; Pipkin v. … Dig.; Snider v. Martin, 55 Ark. 139 , 17 S. W. 712 ; Brown v. Peters, 53 Ark. 182 , 13 S. W. 729 ; Pace v. Robbins, 67 Ark. 232 , 54 S. W. 213 . The complaint does not even set up the homestead right.

St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Stewart

124 Ark. 437 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 12, 1916

Co. v. Caraway, 77 Ark. 405 . The testimony does not, however, warrant a conclusion that any custom had been built up in disregard of the rule which limited the rate of speed through the yards to ten ¡miles per hour. … Co. v.

Fomby School District No. 26 v. Williams

203 Ark. 235 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 1, 1941

Appellants cite and rely upon the case of Crawford County Board of Education v. Schaberg School District No. 69, 186 Ark. 465 , 53 S. W. 2d 995 . … Of course such a provision on the petitions could not bind the board of directors to maintain said schools. Bonner v. Snipes, 103 Ark. 298 , 147 S. W. 56 , is directly against appellants on this point.

Nicholas v. Bright

154 Ark. 1 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 22, 1922

defense that, while he signed the note individually, it was in fact not his obligation but the obligation of the Nicholas P-ump & Well Company, which had been* organized to take over the assets and liabilities of the Nicholas-Brown … This court said, in the case of Womack v.

Papa v. Kitchens, Sheriff

204 Ark. 616 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 29, 1942

The question presented has been very thoroughly considered and discussed by this court in the recent case of Ingram v. Board of Commissioners of Street Improvement District No. 5, 197 Ark. 404 , 123 S. W. 2d 1074 . … It was said in the case of Thibault v. McHaney, 127 Ark. 1 , 192 S.

U. S. Sanitary Specialty Corp. v. Pike County

195 Ark. 724 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 28, 1938

Monroe County v. Brown, 118 Ark. 524 , 177 S. W. 40 ; Izard County v. Vincennes Bridge Co., 122 Ark. 557 , 184 S. W. 67 ; A. L. Greenberg Iron Co. v. Wood, 153 Ark. 371 , 240 S. W. 1074 . In Monroe County v. … Brown, supra, we said: “The effect of our previous decisions, therefore, is to hold that a proceeding of this kind by the county court reviewing its orders of allowance rendered at former terms, does not constitute a collateral

Case v. Allen

21 Kan. 217 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 15, 1878

And in Brown’s Admiralty, p. 204, in the case of The St. Joseph, Mr. … See also, Brown v. Holmes, 13 Kas. 492 ; Colquitt, et al., v. Kirkman, 47 Ga. 555 .

Bennett v. City of Hope

204 Ark. 147 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 21, 1942

Willis v. City of Fort Smith, 121 Ark. 606 , 182 S. W. 275 ; Bain v. Fort Smith Light & Traction Co., 116 Ark. 125 , 172 S. W. 843 , L. R. A. 1915D, 1021; Morrilton Waterworks Imp. Dist. v. Earl, 71 Ark. 4 , 69 S. … This court in Martin v. Hilb, 53 Ark. 300 , 14 S.

State v. Hunter

134 Ark. 443 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 3, 1918

The defendants constituted the board of election commissioners for Perry County, and the indictment against them charges that they violated the election laws by suppressing the certificate of nomination of N. C. … Counsel rely on the decision of this court in Jones v.

Mabry v. Mabry

259 Ark. 622 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 26, 1976

In Hawkins v. … of the deceased and the same relationships still existed at the time of the death of the testator. * # * Having come to the conclusion that Clyde Eugene Brown is an heir to the estate of Jacob B.

Marshall v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co.

2016 Ark. 90 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 3, 2016

Boles v. Huckabee, 340 Ark. 410, 12 S.W.3d 201 (2000) (per curiam). … Brown v. Sachar, 2013 Ark. 319 (per curiam). Marshall has not demonstrated such a claim here. We note that, where no fundamental right is involved, filing fees do not violate due process. Stanley v.