Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.62s
364 S.W.3d 19 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 13, 2010
BROWN, J., concurring. … as of 2007, the most recent year for which data is available, twelve states had adopted such guidelines. 1 American Bar Association Center for Professional Responsibility, 2007 SURVEY ON LAWYER DISCIPLINE Systems, Chart V:
Cited 6 timesPublishedAmerican Southern Trust Co. v. McKee
173 Ark. 147 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 14, 1927
Co. v. M. N. A. Rd. Co., 104 Ark. 475 , 149 S.W. 60 . … Ozark Mutual Life Association v. Dillard, 169 Ark. 136 , 273 S.W. 378 .
Cited 30 timesPublished240 Ark. 447 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 14, 1966
Davis v. State, 206 Ark. 726 , 177 S. W. 2d 190 . It is next contended that the court erred in permitting the state to introduce the shirt, pants, and underwear that had been worn by Staudt at the time of the assault. … Brown, brother-in-law of appellant. In making inquiry as to Farrar’s reputation in the community, Brown was asked as to appellant’s reputation for sobriety.
Cited 3 timesPublished255 Ark. 969 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 4, 1974
Easley v. Inglis, 233 Ark. 589 , 346 S.W. 2d 206 (1961); Fitzwater v. Harris, 231 Ark. 173 , 328 S.W. 2d 501 (19959). … Also see Denton v. Brownlee, 24 Ark. 556 (1867); Bozeman v. Browning, 31 Ark. 364 (1876); Freer v. Less, 159 Ark. 509 , 252 S.W. 354 (1923). Affirmed. Harris, C.J., not participating.
Cited 3 timesPublishedWestern Clay Drainage District v. Wynn
179 Ark. 988 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 8, 1929
That such governmental agencies as is the appellant drainage district may lose a right given it by law by limitation or by laches, as settled in the case of Board of Levee Inspectors of Chicot County v. … Board of Directors St. Francis Levee District v. Fleming, 93 Ark. 490 , 125 S. W. 132, 659 .
Cited 7 timesPublished58 Ark. 580 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 17, 1894
. * 567; Bailey v. Starke, 6 Ark. 192 ; Houston v. Brown, 23 Ark. 333 . In Lang v. … In Brown v.
Cited 1 timesPublished334 Ark. 447 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 8, 1998
Brown, Justice. The appellant in this case is the State of Arkansas, which appeals the trial court’s suppression order regarding marijuana and methamphetamine found in connection with the appellee, Salena Rae Bowers. … See, e.g., United States v. Brown, 102 F.3d 1390 (5th Cir. 1996); United States v. Kimball, 25 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 1994); United States v. Roberson, 6 F.3d 1088 (5th Cir. 1993); United States v.
Cited 9 timesPublished240 Ark. 933 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 23, 1966
Rowe v. Allison, 87 Ark. 206 , 112 S. W. 395 (1908). In a case very similar on the facts to the instant case, Rich v. Walker, 237 Ark. 586 , 374 S. … See Barrentine v. The Henry Wrape Co., 113 Ark. 196 , 167 S. W. 1115 (1914); Thompson v. Semmes, 219 Ark. 67 , 239 S. W. 2d 589 (1951).
Cited 3 timesPublishedARKANSAS BEVERAGE RETAILERS ASS'N v. Moore
256 S.W.3d 488 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 3, 2007
256 S.W.3d 488 (2007) ARKANSAS BEVERAGE RETAILERS ASSOCIATION, INC. and Albert Young, Appellants, v. Robert S. MOORE, Jr., Director, Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, Daniel S. … Moreover, a review of this court's case law reveals a sole reference to the federal Administrative Procedure Act in Arkansas Savings & Loan Ass'ns Board v.
Cited 0 timesPublished76 Ark. 336 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 22, 1905
Metropolitan Board v. Barrie, 34 N. Y. 667 ; Sprayberry v. Atlanta, 87 Ga. 120 ; Schwuchow v. Chicago, 68 Ill. 444 ; Moore v. Indianapolis, 120 Ind. 483 ; Columbus v. Cutcomp, 17 N. W. Rep. 47 ; Martin v. … Enc. (2d Ed.), pp. 262, 263; Metropolitan Board v. Barrie, 34 N. Y. 667 ; Schwuchow v. Chicago, 68 Ill. 444 ; Sprayberry v. Atlanta, 87 Ga. 120 ; Boston Beer Co. v. Massachusetts, 97 U. S. 25 ; Black on Intox.
Cited 5 timesPublished58 Ark. 1 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 3, 1893
These definitions are supported by the Supreme Court of Massachusetts in the cases of the Commonwealth v. Riggs, 14 Gray, 378 ; Commonwealth v. Annis, 15 Gray, 199 . Barth v. State, 18 Conn. 432 ; Wilson v. … State, 24 id. 57; Browne’s Judicial Interpretations, under the word “shop,” page 419.
Cited 7 timesPublishedPumphrey v. Road Improvement District No. 1
125 Ark. 422 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 23, 1916
Kirst v. Street Imp. Dist., 86 Ark. 1 ; Thibault v. … Peay v. City of Little Rock, 32 Ark. 31 -39; Coffman v. St. Francis Drainage Dist., 83 Ark. 54 ; Kirst v. Street Imp. Dist., supra.
Cited 2 timesPublishedRoss, Disbursing Agent v. Rich
210 Ark. 74 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 13, 1946
In the case of Wilson v. … See Collector v. Day, 11 Wall. 113 , 20 L. Ed. 122 ; McCulloch v. Maryland, 4 Wheat 316, 4 L. Ed. 579 .
Cited 7 timesPublishedSt. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co v. Watson
97 Ark. 560 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 13, 1911
Pettigrew v. Washington County, 43 Ark. 33 ; Driver v. Lanier, 66 Ark. 126 ; Hadley v. Bryan, 70 Ark. 197 . … Co. v. Townsend, 69 Ark. 380 ; Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Bunch, 82 Ark. 522 ; Jones v. St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co., 96 Ark. 366 .
Cited 8 timesPublished326 Ark. 285 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 21, 1996
Applegate v. Riggal, 229 Ark. 773 , 318 S.W.2d 596 (1958). … Woodward v. Blythe, 249 Ark. 793 , 462 S.W.2d 205 (1971). The case of Van Troop v. Dew, 150 Ark. 560 , 234 S.W. 992 (1921), is instructive.
Cited 24 timesPublished183 Ark. 429 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 9, 1931
By this legislation a board was created consisting of the Governor, the Auditor of State, the Chairman of the Highway Commission, and seven others, designated as the State Agricultural Credit Board. … Hays v. McDaniel, supra; Bush v. Martineau, 174 Ark. 214 , 295 S. W. 9 , supra.
Cited 17 timesPublishedFarmers' & Mechanics' Sayings Co. v. Bazore
67 Ark. 252 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 9, 1899
Pickett v. Merchants’ National Bank, 32 Ark. 346 . He paid only a nominal sum for Bazore's interest, and the property was quite valuable, worth several thousand dollars. … Rector v. Southern Building & Loan Association, 98 Fed. 1007 .
Cited 3 timesPublished85 Ark. 431 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 9, 1908
In the case of Kegel v. … The same rule has been announced in the following cases: Billings v. Noble, 43 N. W. 1131 ; Collins v. Beebe, 7 N. Y. Supp. 443 ; Arnot v. Wright, 55 Hun, 561 ; Dintruff v. Tuthill, 62 Hun, 591 .
Cited 10 timesPublished345 Ark. 430 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 28, 2001
Brown v. Tucker, 330 Ark. 435 , 954 S.W.2d 262 (1997); Mitchell v. Globe Int’l Pub., Inc., 773 F. Supp. 1235 (W.D. Ark. 1991). We held in the case of United Ins. Co. of America v. … Brown v. Tucker, 330 Ark. 435 , 954 S.W.2d 262 (1997); Cross v. Arkansas Livestock & Poultry Comm’n, 328 Ark. 255 , 943 S.W.2d 230 (1997); United Bilt Homes, Inc. v. Sampson, 310 Ark. 47 , 832 S.W.2d 502 (1992).
Cited 84 timesPublishedPerdue & Hill v. Road Improvement District No. 1
159 Ark. 117 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 14, 1923
Williams v. Board of Directors, 100 Ark. 166 ; Drainage District v. Kochtitzky, 146 Ark. 494 ; Lewelling & Price-Williams v. St. Francis County Road Imp. Dist. No. 1, 158 Ark. 91 ; LeRoy v. … Harwood. 119 Ark. 418 ; Whitener-London Realty Co. v. Ritter, 94 Ark. 263 ; Hot Springs Ry. Co. v. Maher, 48 Ark. 522 .
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna