Case law

Cole v. Blackwell

38 Ark. 271 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 15, 1881

, upon the estimate of the board of school directors and without a vote of the electors of the district, was abrogated and repealed by section 3, of Art. … Hodgkin v. Fry, collector, 33 Ark., 716; Worthen, county clerk, v. Badgett et al., 32 Ark., 496; Cairo & Fulton R. R. Co. v. Parks, Ib., 131; Murphy v. Harbison et al., 29 Ark., 340. The decree is affirmed.

Means v. State

118 Ark. 362 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 3, 1915

Cessill v. State, 40 Ark. 503 ; Kinnanne v. State, 106 Ark. 286 ; Wolfe v. State, 107 Ark. 33 . … In the case of Brown v.

Helena-West Helena School District v. Monday

361 Ark. 82 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 3, 2005

Cooper Realty Inv. v. Arkansas Contractors Licensing Board, 355 Ark. 156 , 134 S.W.2d 1 (2003); Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. P.O. Market, Inc., 347 Ark. 651 , 66 S.W.3d 620 (2002). … Carter v. Bush, 296 Ark. 261 , 753 S.W.2d 534 (1988). In Rudd v.

Walker v. Goodlett

102 Ark. 383 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 19, 1912

Brown was only about ten years of age when plaintiff was bom, and the only reason that he remembered the fact is that his brother was bom in October, 1888, and the plaintiff was a good sized baby at that time. … An infant can bind and incumber his estate for the value of necessaries furnished to him, (Cooper v. State, 37 Ark. 421 ), but can not irrevocably alienate his estate, even for that purpose.

Young v. State

308 Ark. 647 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 23, 1992

Robinson v. State, 255 Ark. 893 , 503 S.W.2d 883 (1914); Brown v. State, 248 Ark. 561 , 453 S.W.2d 50 (1970). However, in Morris v. … Therefore, we adhere to the principle of stare decisis and follow the rule enunciated in Fight, Robinson, and Brown.

Priest v. Murphy

103 Ark. 464 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 15, 1912

Murphy, in consideration of the sum of one dollar, and the further consideration that he was to clothe, board, raise and care for his three boys, William Martin, Gus Evans and Rasnus Abraham, aged, respectively, seven, five … Salyers v. Smith, 67 Ark. 526 ; Whittaker v. Trammell, 86 Ark. 251 .

Dickinson v. Cypress Creek Drainage District

139 Ark. 76 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 26, 1919

Board of Improvement v. Pollard, 98 Ark. 543 . … Sims v. Cumby, 53 Ark. 418 ; Smith v. Macon, 20 Ark. 17 . The decree must be reversed with directions to impose the penalty fixed by law. In all other respects it is affirmed.

State v. Bowers

334 Ark. 447 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 8, 1998

Brown, Justice. The appellant in this case is the State of Arkansas, which appeals the trial court’s suppression order regarding marijuana and methamphetamine found in connection with the appellee, Salena Rae Bowers. … See, e.g., United States v. Brown, 102 F.3d 1390 (5th Cir. 1996); United States v. Kimball, 25 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 1994); United States v. Roberson, 6 F.3d 1088 (5th Cir. 1993); United States v.

Ashley v. State

310 Ark. 575 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 12, 1992

Miller v. State, 309 Ark. 117 , 827 S.W.2d 149 (1992). … Holt, C.J., and Brown, J., not participating.

Bourland v. Pollock

157 Ark. 538 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 19, 1923

The case of Wisconsin Industrial School for Girls v. … Mary’s Industrial School v. Brown, 45 Md. 310 .

Jones v. Jones

329 Ark. 320 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 30, 1997

See Jones v. Jones, 328 Ark. 684 , 944 S.W.2d 121 (1997) (Jones V). In Jones v. … Brown, J., concurs.

Perry v. State

371 Ark. 170 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 4, 2007

In Boone v. … Likewise, in State v. Brown, this court, ruling on the State’s cross-appeal, noted that the trial court’s choice of jury instructions was in error. 265 Ark. 41, 44 , 577 S.W.2d 581, 583 (1979).

Webb v. State

253 Ark. 448 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 20, 1972

(See also our opinion in Bradshaw v. … Key v. State, 213 Ark. 978 , 214 S.W. 2d 234 (1948); Cross v. State, 200 Ark. 1165 , 143 S.W. 2d 530 (1940); Lane v. State, 171 Ark. 180 , 283 S.W. 353 (1926).

In re Pitchford

265 Ark. 752 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 21, 1979

In McKenzie v. … Martin v. Walton, 368 U.S. 25 ; Phelps v. Board of Education, 300 U.S. 319 . As earlier st: _ed, petitioner’s principal argument is based on Ark. Stat. Ann. § 25-101, heretofore set out.

Eaton v. Sims

59 Ark. 611 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 17, 1894

Gullett v. Lamberton, 6 Ark. 109 ; Brown v. Wright, 17 id. 9; Clinton v. Estes, 20 id. 216; Finn v. Hempstead, 24 id. 111; Smith v. Hamlet, 43 id. 321. … See Bowden v. Spellman, ante, p. 251, and authorities there cited (where fraud was charged and shown). See also Pier v. Duff, 63 Pa.

Nakdimen v. Fort Smith & Van Buren Bridge District

115 Ark. 194 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 13, 1914

For instance, counsel, to sustain their contention in this respect, mainly rely upon the ease of Garland v. Board of Revenue of Montgomery County, 87 Ala. 223 . … Co. v. Board of Directors of Levee District of Jackson County, supra. In the case of Fitzgerald v.

Arrington v. King

179 Ark. 584 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 20, 1929

Louis v. Taylor, 176 Ark. 1 , 1 S. W. (2d) 818 . … People’s Savings Bank v. Manes, 136 Ark. 215 , 206 S. W. 315 ; Miles v. Dodson, 102 Ark. 422 , 144 S. W. 908 , 50 L. R. A. (N. S.) 83.

Norton v. Nat. Bank of Commerce of Pine Bluff

240 Ark. 143 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 31, 1966

Alliance Discount Corp. v. Shaw, 195 Pa. Superior Ct. 601 , 171 A. 2d 548 (1961). What one 1957 Oldsmobile sells for does not fix the amount a different one may be expected to bring. … Barrett and the Board refer to the initial transaction between Norton and the bank as a “financing” of Norton by the bank.

Jones v. Melindy

62 Ark. 203 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 28, 1896

As was said in Vaughan v. … It was not' competent to prove by Brown, the register of deeds, the records of his office.

Sadler, Trustee v. Scott

203 Ark. 648 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 26, 1942

He saw the bailer run and he observed in it a brown looking shale. He examined the tools and drill and saw nothing but a.'“shaley substance” or a “brown skum.” There was no indication of oil. … Co. v. Braswell, Admr., 198 Ark. 143 , 127 S.