Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersark

10,000+ results

2.20s

  • Hadden v. Hadden

    320 Ark. 480 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 15, 1995

    We affirmed, citing Crews v. … See Smith v. Babin, 317 Ark. 1 , 875 S.W.2d 500 (1994); Haynes v. State, 314 Ark. 354 , 862 S.W.2d 275 (1993).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Dodson v. Allstate Insurance

    345 Ark. 430 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 28, 2001

    Brown v. Tucker, 330 Ark. 435 , 954 S.W.2d 262 (1997); Mitchell v. Globe Int’l Pub., Inc., 773 F. Supp. 1235 (W.D. Ark. 1991). We held in the case of United Ins. Co. of America v. … Brown v. Tucker, 330 Ark. 435 , 954 S.W.2d 262 (1997); Cross v. Arkansas Livestock & Poultry Comm’n, 328 Ark. 255 , 943 S.W.2d 230 (1997); United Bilt Homes, Inc. v. Sampson, 310 Ark. 47 , 832 S.W.2d 502 (1992).

    Cited 84 timesPublished
  • Star City Special School District v. Common School District No. 9

    190 Ark. 238 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 28, 1935

    No. 19 v. Special School District No. 37, 186 Ark. 373 , 53 S. W. (2d) 579 , that the notice provided for is a prerequisite. That opinion is not in any respect modified or changed. … Co. v. State, 179 Ark. 1128 , 20 S. W. (2d) 878 . It is argued, however, that, had the notice been more definite, other taxpayers might have joined in this suit.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Marshall v. Davis Construction Co.

    176 Ark. 96 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 30, 1928

    Appellants contend that, under the rule announced by this court in the oases of School District v. Bennett, 52 Ark. 511 , 13 S. W. 132 , and Kirst v. Street Improvement Dist. No. 120, 86 Ark. 1 , 109 S. … And in the last case cited, said: “Two members of a board of assessment of an improvement district are not authorized to act as a board in the absence of the third member, and without notice to him.”

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rn v. Jm

    347 Ark. 203 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 6, 2001

    Shelton v. Fiser, 340 Ark. 89, 94 , 8 S.W.3d 557, 560 (2000). See also, Board of Trustees v. Stodola, 328 Ark. 194 , 942 S.W.2d 255 (1997); Donoho v. Donoho, 318 Ark. 637 , 887 S.W.2d 290 (1994); Conway Corp. v. … In Board of Trustees v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Yankaway v. State

    366 Ark. 18 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 23, 2006

    Brown, J., concurring in part; dissenting in part. See Boyle v. State, 363 Ark. 356 , 214 S.W.3d 250 (2005) (Brown, J., concurring in part; dissenting in part).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Ferrell v. State

    305 Ark. 511 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 20, 1991

    See Brown v. State, 304 Ark. 98 , 800 S.W.2d 424 (1990). A severance motion will be denied if the two offenses were part of a single scheme or plan or if both offenses require the same evidence. Id. … And the two offenses do not require the same evidence, which we cited in Brown v. State, supra, as an alternative reason for upholding the trial judge’s decision to deny severance.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Ellis v. Allen

    202 Ark. 1007 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 20, 1941

    In the case of Satterfield, Mayor, v. Fewell, ante p. 67, 149 S. W. 2d 949 , this court said that the opinion in the case of Fiveash v. … Voris v. City of Seattle, et al., 74 Wash. 197 , 4 A. L.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Baer v. Whittaker

    57 Ark. 151 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 7, 1893

    The plaintiff sued to recover a mule, which was described in the affidavit for replevin as “ a brown mule, eight years old, about fifteen hands high, branded £ on left shoulder, named Potts.” … Kempe v. Darr, 54 Ark. 91 . It follows that plaintiff established no right to the mule, and could therefore have suffered no prejudice by the court’s charge to the jury. Affirm.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Young v. Rice

    308 Ark. 593 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 9, 1992

    Brown v. FBI, 658 F.2d 71 (2d Cir. 1981). While we recognize that the federal FOIA personnel exemption is not identical to ours, we find the federal courts’ balancing of the two competing interests to be persuasive. … See Department of Air Force v. Rose, 425 U.S. 352 (1976).

    Cited 376 timesPublished
  • Payne v. State

    333 Ark. 154 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 7, 1998

    Brown, Justice. … W. v. State, supra (order imposing conditions on a juvenile pending release prior to a plea date not final); Kelly v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Atwood v. Ballard

    172 Ark. 176 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 23, 1926

    Pledger v. Birkhead, 156 Ark. 443, 455 , 246 S. W. 510 , and cases there cited. See also Beaty v. Swift, 123 Ark. 166 , 184 S. W. 442 . … Applying the principles of law announced in Pledger v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Hamlin Flying Service, Inc. v. Breckenridge

    275 Ark. 188 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 22, 1982

    Washington National Insurance Co. v. Meeks, 252 Ark. 1178 , 482 S.W. 2d 618 (1972). … Fanning v. Hembree Oil Co., 245 Ark. 825 , 434 S.W. 2d 822 (1968).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Yarbrough v. Beardon and Phillips v. Foreman

    206 Ark. 553 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 10, 1944

    Metropolitan Board v. Barrie, 34 N. Y. 657 ; Sprayberry, City of, v. Atlanta, 87 Ga. 120 , 13 S. E. 197 ; Schwuchow, City of, v. Chicago, 68 Ill. 444 ; Moore, City of, v. Indianapolis, 120 Ind. 483 , 22 N. … Those interested in the subject are referred to Board of Trustees v. Scott, 125 Ky. 545 , 101 S. W. 944 ; Eggen v. Offutt, 128 Ky. 314 , 108 S. W. 333 ; Schwarts v. People, 47 Colo. 483 , 104 Pac. 92 ; State v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Perley v. Taylor

    21 Kan. 712 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 15, 1879

    That the testimony shows that defendants were employed by plaintiff in two actions pending in Brown county, Kansas, wherein these plaintiffs were defendants, and one Jphn G. … (Railroad Co. v. Jaques, 20 Kas. 639 .) So in this case, the plaintiff was liable for the taxes of 1872.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Guthrie v. Baker

    224 Ark. 752 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 7, 1955

    Appellant and appellee were rival candidates for membership on the County Board of Education in Zone 2, Searcy County at a regular election held March 20, 1954. … He was also correct in concluding that this case is controlled by the decision in Parsons v. Mason, 223 Ark. 281 , 265 S. W. 2d 526 . This action, concededly, is not an election contest.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Shorey v. Thompson

    295 Ark. 664 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 6, 1988

    He also relied upon the case of Davey v. City of Atlanta, 204 S.E.2d 322 (Ga. 1974), for the proposition that he had the absolute right to record the testimony. … Brown v. Wood, Judge, 257 Ark. 252 , 516 S.W.2d 98 (1974).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Energy Oil Co. v. Rose Oil Co.

    250 Ark. 484 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 19, 1971

    Lyle Brown, Justice. Appellant instituted this suit under the Unfair Practices Act to prohibit appellee from retailing gasoline at less than cost. Ark. Stat. Ann. § 70-301 et seq. (Repl. 1957). … Young v. Farmers Bank & Trust Co., 248 Ark. 613 , 453 S. W. 2d 47 (1970); Tenbrook v. Daisy Mfg. Co., 238 Ark. 532 , 383 S. W. 2d 101 (1964); and Reeves, v. Miles, 236 Ark. 261 , 365 S. W. 2d 460 (1963).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • In re Pitchford

    265 Ark. 752 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 21, 1979

    In McKenzie v. … Martin v. Walton, 368 U.S. 25 ; Phelps v. Board of Education, 300 U.S. 319 . As earlier st: _ed, petitioner’s principal argument is based on Ark. Stat. Ann. § 25-101, heretofore set out.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Cole v. Blackwell

    38 Ark. 271 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 15, 1881

    , upon the estimate of the board of school directors and without a vote of the electors of the district, was abrogated and repealed by section 3, of Art. … Hodgkin v. Fry, collector, 33 Ark., 716; Worthen, county clerk, v. Badgett et al., 32 Ark., 496; Cairo & Fulton R. R. Co. v. Parks, Ib., 131; Murphy v. Harbison et al., 29 Ark., 340. The decree is affirmed.

    Cited 8 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.