Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersark

10,000+ results

0.89s

  • Rutland v. P. H. Ruebel Company

    202 Ark. 987 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 13, 1941

    See Drda v. Drda, 298 Ill. 278 , 131 N. E. 599 . In the case of Hanson v. … Campbell in the construction of Henderson-Brown College and acting as such agent purchased the necessary material for Henderson-Brown College, this fact alone is not sufficient evidence that he had any authority to enter

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Heagerty v. State

    335 Ark. 521 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 21, 1998

    BROWN, Justice. This appeal concerns the order of the trial court denying appellant Joshua M. Heagerty's motion to transfer his six drug cases to juvenile court. … See Thompson v. State, 330 Ark. 746 , 958 S.W.2d 1 (1997) (Newbern, J., concurring) (Brown, J., concurring in part; dissenting in part).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Cleburne County Bank v. Butler Gin Co.

    184 Ark. 503 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 26, 1931

    by a board of five members, all of whom should be stockholders. … Co. v. First Nat. Bank, supra; Anderson-Tully Co. v. Gillett Lbr. Co., supra; Love v. Metro. Church Assn., 181 Ill. App. 102 ; Washington Savings Bank v. B. & D. Bank, 107 Mo. 133 , 17 S. W. 644 , 28 Am. St.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Marshall v. Davis Construction Co.

    176 Ark. 96 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 30, 1928

    Appellants contend that, under the rule announced by this court in the oases of School District v. Bennett, 52 Ark. 511 , 13 S. W. 132 , and Kirst v. Street Improvement Dist. No. 120, 86 Ark. 1 , 109 S. … And in the last case cited, said: “Two members of a board of assessment of an improvement district are not authorized to act as a board in the absence of the third member, and without notice to him.”

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wallace v. Todd

    195 Ark. 134 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 6, 1937

    In Leigh v. Trippe, 91 Ark. 117 , 120 S. … In Townsend v. Penrose, 84 Ark. 320 , 105 S.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Star City Special School District v. Common School District No. 9

    190 Ark. 238 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 28, 1935

    No. 19 v. Special School District No. 37, 186 Ark. 373 , 53 S. W. (2d) 579 , that the notice provided for is a prerequisite. That opinion is not in any respect modified or changed. … Co. v. State, 179 Ark. 1128 , 20 S. W. (2d) 878 . It is argued, however, that, had the notice been more definite, other taxpayers might have joined in this suit.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Robinson v. Swigart

    8 Ark. 71 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 15, 1852

    The only question of law in this case, was settled in the eases. of Smith v. Capers, at this term; and as we think this cause is within the rule of Drennen v. Brown, (5 Eng.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Clark v. Mahan

    268 Ark. 37 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 4, 1980

    He was certified by the Faulkner County Board of Election Commissioners and sworn in as marshal on January 1, 1979. … Thomas v. Sitton, 213 Ark. 816 , 212 S.W.2d 710 (1948). We have also held a city had no power to pass an ordinance abolishing the elective office of marshal. City of Augusta v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Sumpter v. Duffie

    80 Ark. 369 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 29, 1906

    Glidewell v. Martin, 51 Ark. 559 . The other section provides that in all contests for county, township or municipal offices an appeal shall lie from any inferior board, council or tribunal to the circuit court. … Davis v. Moore, 70 Ark. 240 ; Douglas v. Hutchinson, 183 Ill. 323 ; Williamson v. Lane, 52 Tex. 335 ; Knox v. Fesler, 17 Ind. 254 ; Patterson v. Murray, 53 N. C. 278 ; Reynolds, etc., Co. v. Police Jury. 44 La.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Thornbrough v. Barnhart

    232 Ark. 862 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 5, 1960

    The Commissioner appealed this determination of the Board of Beview to the Pulaski Circuit Court; the Pulaski Circuit Court sustained the determination of the Board of Beview by a final judgment; and this appeal is from that … See also: Jordan v. McCabe, 209 Ark. 788 , 192 S. W. 2d 538 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Shank v. State

    189 Ark. 243 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 14, 1934

    Brown, which the court refused to allow him to answer was as follows: Q. … Brown was asked: Q. "Is it true, if it is true, that Mr.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Cropper v. Tackett

    186 Ark. 969 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 13, 1933

    Its only defect was the omission to have the action of the county board of Baxter County. A similar case is that of White v. Board of Education of Independence County, 184 Ark. 480 , 42 S. … W. (2d) 989 , where districts in one county were annexed to a district in another county with the action of the county board in one county only.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Upton v. Graves

    255 Ark. 516 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 13, 1973

    The trial court in refusing bail as in capital offense cases recognized the effect of Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 , 92 S. Ct. 2726 , 33 L. … Brown, 468 F. 2d 301 (9th Cir. 1972), it follows that, in view of Graham v. State, 253 Ark. 462 , 486 S.W. 2d 678 and Kuehn v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Bradley County Road Improvement Districts Nos. 1 & 2 v. Wilson

    168 Ark. 204 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 16, 1925

    Sain v. Bogle, 122 Ark. 14 ; Thibault v. McHaney, 127 Ark. 1 . … ‘This feature of the case is ruled by our decisions in Gould v. Toland, 149 Ark. 476 , and Holcombe v. Kennedy, 158 Ark. 585 . Mr.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Kelleher v. Subsidiary Drnge. 11 of St. Francis

    170 Ark. 1138 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 3, 1926

    The assessors heretofore appointed by the board of directors for the said district shall continue to be the assessors of said district until superseded by said board, and said assessors shall proceed to make an assessment … V. and E. S. Wills, partners doing business under the firm name of A. Y. Wills & Sons, contractors.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Burt v. Arkansas Livestock & Poultry Commission

    278 Ark. 236 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 24, 1983

    Co. v. Chicago, 166 U.S. 226 (1897). … We were presented the question of equal protection in the case of Corbitt v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Fairchild v. State

    349 Ark. 147 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 6, 2002

    Brown v. State, 347 Ark. 44 , 60 S.W.3d 422 (2001); Barcenas v. State, 343 Ark. 181 , 33 S.W.3d 136 (2000); Smith v. State, 334 Ark. 190 , 974 S.W.2d 427 (1998). … Smith v. State, 254 Ark. 538, 542 , 494 S.W.2d 489, 491 (1973). See also Brown, 347 Ark. 44 , 60 S.W.3d 422 ; Foreman v. State, 328 Ark. 583 , 945 S.W.2d 926 (1997); Griffin v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Marine Services Unlimited, Inc. v. Rakes

    323 Ark. 757 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 18, 1996

    See Red Bud Realty Co. v. South, 96 Ark. 281 , 131 S.W. 340 (1910). Further, actions of a majority of the members of a board of directors are invalid if absent directors had no legal notice of the meetings. … Anderson v. MT. Clemens Pottery Co., 328 U.S. 680 (1946).

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Turney v. Alread Public Schools

    282 Ark. 84 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 26, 1984

    Lamar School District No. 39 v. Kinder, 278 Ark. 1 , 642 S.W.2d 885 (1982). We will not reverse the findings of the trial court sitting as trier of fact unless those findings are clearly erroneous. … Superior Improvement Co. v. Mastic Corp., 270 Ark. 471 , 604 S.W.2d 950 (1980).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Millsap v. Kelley

    2016 Ark. 406 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 17, 2016

    See Pittman v. … because the board’s determinations regarding parole are discretionary); see also Cridge v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.