Case law

Star City Special School District v. Common School District No. 9

190 Ark. 238 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 28, 1935

No. 19 v. Special School District No. 37, 186 Ark. 373 , 53 S. W. (2d) 579 , that the notice provided for is a prerequisite. That opinion is not in any respect modified or changed. … Co. v. State, 179 Ark. 1128 , 20 S. W. (2d) 878 . It is argued, however, that, had the notice been more definite, other taxpayers might have joined in this suit.

Robinson v. Swigart

8 Ark. 71 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 15, 1852

The only question of law in this case, was settled in the eases. of Smith v. Capers, at this term; and as we think this cause is within the rule of Drennen v. Brown, (5 Eng.

State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Irby

190 Ark. 786 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 8, 1935

Brown v. U. S., 233 Fed. 353 , L. R. A. 1917A, 1133, and cases therein cited. … In Jones v. Board, etc., 56 Miss. 766 , 31 Am.

Stills v. Stills

361 S.W.3d 823 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 18, 2010

Brown v. Cleveland, 328 Ark. 73, 77 , 940 S.W.2d 876, 878 (1997); Stephenson v. Stephenson, 237 Ark. 724, 726 , 375 S.W.2d 659, 660 (1964). All considerations other than best interest of the child are secondary. … BROWN and SHEFFIELD, JJ„ join. . The idea that a real advantage must be shown before a move would be allowed, presuming any move is detrimental, is found in Staab v.

Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Batsel

100 Ark. 526 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 23, 1911

Co. v. Brown. We concur only-on the ground that the latter case is now the rule of this court.

Shank v. State

189 Ark. 243 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 14, 1934

Brown, which the court refused to allow him to answer was as follows: Q. … Brown was asked: Q. "Is it true, if it is true, that Mr.

St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Pate

90 Ark. 135 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 5, 1909

Pate boarded a train of the defendant at Morrilton for the purpose of going thereon to the town of Atkins; that after boarding the train, and before it left the station, her intestate concluded not to go 'to Atkins but to … Hlass v. Fulford, 77 Ark. 63 . Judgment .affirmed.

Deboha v. Summerlin

266 Ark. 1037 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 24, 1979

Quapaw Quarter Ass’n v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, 261 Ark. 74 , 546 S.W. 2d 427 (1977); and City of Little Rock v. Kaufman, 249 Ark. 530 , 460 S.W. 2d 88 (1970). We find there was. … See, e.g., City of Little Rock v. Kaufman, supra, and Zoning Flexibility: Bored of Adjustment?, 30 Ark. L. Rev. 491 , 509 (1977), and cases cited there.

Ford v. Keith

338 Ark. 487 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 22, 1999

Wright v. Arkansas State Plant Board, 311 Ark. 125, 130 , 842 S.W.2d 42 (1992). … P. 81(a); See also Whitlock v. G.P.W. Nursing Home, Inc., 283 Ark. 158 , 672 S.W.2d 48 (1984) and Wright v. Arkansas State Plant Board, 311 Ark. 125 , 842 S.W.2d 42 (1992).

Westbrook v. McDonald

184 Ark. 740 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 23, 1931

Conway v. Summers, 176 Ark. 796 , 4 S. W. (2d) 19 . … Blanton Co. v. First National Bank of Marked Tree, 175 Ark. 1107 , 1 S. W. (2d) 558 ; Hogue v. Hogue, 137 Ark. 485 , 208 S. W. 579 ; Forehand v. Higbee, 133 Ark. 191 , 202 S. W. 29 ; Montague v.

Rives v. McGaughey

210 Ark. 658 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 11, 1946

Sibly v. England, 90 Ark. 420 , 119 S. W. 820 ; Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland, v. Rieff, 181 Ark. 798 , 27 S. W. 2d 1008 ; Oliver v. Henry Quellmalz Lumber & Manufacturing Company, 170 Ark. 1029 , 282 S. … Wolfe v. Irwin & Ward Company, 71 Ark. 438 , 75 S. W. 722 ; Stiewel v. Webb Press Company, 79 Ark. 45 , 94 S. W. 915 , 116 Am. St. Rep. 62 ; 10 Cyc. 1001.” Merchants & Farmers Bank v.

Andrews v. Victor Metal Products

237 Ark. 540 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 20, 1964

See Andrews v. Victor Metal Products Corp., 235 Ark. 568 , 361 S. W. 2d 19 . … See generally, Clark v. Whitney, 194 Ark. 858 , 109 S. W. 2d 930 . Reversed and remanded.

Rugless v. State

97 Ark. 152 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 2, 1911

Brown v. State, 28 Ark. 126 .

Hadden v. Hadden

320 Ark. 480 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 15, 1995

We affirmed, citing Crews v. … See Smith v. Babin, 317 Ark. 1 , 875 S.W.2d 500 (1994); Haynes v. State, 314 Ark. 354 , 862 S.W.2d 275 (1993).

Nowlin v. Kreis

213 Ark. 1027 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 25, 1948

Some cases hold that the signing of a petition for a local option election does not disqualify the Board or official who is later to pass on the petition. See Galey v. Board of Commissioners, 174 Ind. 181 , 91 N. … Town of Marianna, 43 Ark. 324 , and Osborne v. Board of Improvement, 94 Ark. 563 , 128 S. W. 357 . However, this need not be further discussed since we hold that the alleged disqualification of Judge King was waived.

Payne v. State

333 Ark. 154 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 7, 1998

Brown, Justice. … W. v. State, supra (order imposing conditions on a juvenile pending release prior to a plea date not final); Kelly v.

Heagerty v. State

335 Ark. 521 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 21, 1998

BROWN, Justice. This appeal concerns the order of the trial court denying appellant Joshua M. Heagerty's motion to transfer his six drug cases to juvenile court. … See Thompson v. State, 330 Ark. 746 , 958 S.W.2d 1 (1997) (Newbern, J., concurring) (Brown, J., concurring in part; dissenting in part).

Young v. Rice

308 Ark. 593 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 9, 1992

Brown v. FBI, 658 F.2d 71 (2d Cir. 1981). While we recognize that the federal FOIA personnel exemption is not identical to ours, we find the federal courts’ balancing of the two competing interests to be persuasive. … See Department of Air Force v. Rose, 425 U.S. 352 (1976).

Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Hoover

182 Ark. 1065 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 12, 1931

His son was employed in 1923 and 1924 and earned $65 and his board. … Co. v. Boback, 71 Ark. 427 , 75 S.W. 473 ; American Ins. Co. v. Mordic, 168 Ark. 795 , 271 S.W. 460 ; United Order of Good Samaritans v. Lomax, 172 Ark. 330 , 288 S.W. 709 ; St. L. I. M. S. R. Co. v.

Perley v. Taylor

21 Kan. 712 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 15, 1879

That the testimony shows that defendants were employed by plaintiff in two actions pending in Brown county, Kansas, wherein these plaintiffs were defendants, and one Jphn G. … (Railroad Co. v. Jaques, 20 Kas. 639 .) So in this case, the plaintiff was liable for the taxes of 1872.