Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersark

10,000+ results

3.17s

  • Farmers' Union Mercantile Co. v. Ricketts

    129 Ark. 177 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 14, 1917

    Atlanta & Walworth Butter & Cheese Association v. Frank M. Smith, 141 Wis. 377 , 123 N. W. 106 , 32 L. R. A. (N. … Bevill, Jones and Knighton, all members of the board of directors testified to this fact and their evidence is uncontradicted.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Hamlin Flying Service, Inc. v. Breckenridge

    275 Ark. 188 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 22, 1982

    Washington National Insurance Co. v. Meeks, 252 Ark. 1178 , 482 S.W. 2d 618 (1972). … Fanning v. Hembree Oil Co., 245 Ark. 825 , 434 S.W. 2d 822 (1968).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • SOUTHLAND MOBILE HOME CORPORATI0N v. Winders

    262 Ark. 693 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 30, 1978

    The appellees are mistaken in arguing, on the basis of the result reached in Rogers v. … Coddington v. Brown, 123 Ark. 486 , 185 S.W. 809 (1916). Accord: Burt v. Henderson, 152 Ark. 547 , 238 S.W. 626 (1922); Simpson & Webb Furn. Co. v. Moore, 94 Ark. 347 , 126 S.W. 1074 (1910); Fletcher v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Bonds v. Rogers

    219 Ark. 319 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 9, 1951

    See Spear v. Marshall, 95 Utah 62 , 79 Pac. 2d 15 ; and Carlson v. Burt, 111 Calif. 129, 43 Pac. 583 . In 29 C. J. … This Act has been considered by us in a number of cases, some of which are listed in Tollett v. Knod, 210 Ark. 781 , 197 S.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. Hall

    229 Ark. 404 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 29, 1958

    In one of our leading- cases — Newton v. Hall, 196 Ark. 929 , 120 S. … Hogan v. Hall, 198 Ark. 681 , 130 S. W. 2d 716 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Guthrie v. Baker

    224 Ark. 752 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 7, 1955

    Appellant and appellee were rival candidates for membership on the County Board of Education in Zone 2, Searcy County at a regular election held March 20, 1954. … He was also correct in concluding that this case is controlled by the decision in Parsons v. Mason, 223 Ark. 281 , 265 S. W. 2d 526 . This action, concededly, is not an election contest.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Paving Dists. 2 and 3 of Blytheville v. Baker

    171 Ark. 692 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 28, 1926

    Board of Improvement v. Pollard, 98 Ark. 543 ; Gannaway v. Street Improvement District, 164 Ark. 407 . … House v. Road Improvement District, 158 Ark. 357 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Henderson

    356 Ark. 335 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 4, 2004

    See, e.g., Moix-McNutt v. Brown, 348 Ark. 518 , 74 S.W.3d 612 (2002); Chamberlin v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 343 Ark. 392 , 36 S.W.3d 281 (2001); Ragar v. Brown, 332 Ark. 214 , 964 S.W.2d 372 (1998). … Brown, J., concurs.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Arkansas Annual Conference of the Ame Church, Inc. v. New Direction Praise & Worship Center, Inc.

    375 Ark. 428 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 30, 2009

    Gipson v. Brown, 295 Ark. 371, 374 , 749 S.W.2d 297, 298 (1988). Nonetheless, “[i]t is unquestionably the duty of the courts to decide legal questions involving the ownership and control of church property.” Holiman v. … Presbytery of Cumberland Presbyterian Church v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Lesser-Goldman Cotton Co. v. Adams

    158 Ark. 10 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 26, 1923

    Dorr v. School Dist., 40 Ark. 237 ; Abbott v. Parker, 103 Ark. 425 ; Jenkins v. … Trulock v. Parse, 83 Ark. 152 . See also note to Dunscomb v. Randolph, 89 Am. St. Rep. pp. 915, 927, 939.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Martin v. Rochelle

    249 Ark. 509 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 23, 1970

    Ry. v. Pate, 90 Ark. 135 , 118 S. W. 260 (1909); Wigmore on Evidence, Vol. 6, § 1842 (1940). … Mitchell v. Smith, 206 Ark. 936 , 175 S. W. 2d 201 (1943); Whitlock v. Barham & Duncan, 172 Ark. 198 , 288 S. W. 4 (1926).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Simpson v. State

    310 Ark. 493 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 28, 1992

    Brown, Justice. … Ferrell v. State, 305 Ark. 511 , 810 S.W.2d 29 (1991); Brown v. State, 304 Ark. 98 , 800 S.W.2d 424 (1990); Ruiz v. State, 273 Ark. 94 , 617 S.W.2d 6 (1981).

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Ware v. Benedikt

    225 Ark. 185 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 13, 1955

    See Findlay v. Board of Supervisors, 72 Ariz. 58 , 230 P. 2d 526 , 24 A. L. R. 2d 841, and authorities cited in an exhaustive annotation of said case in 24 A. L. R. 2d 850. … Medical Soc. of Mobile County v. Walker, 1944, 245 Ala. 135 , 16 So. 2d 321 ; Harris v. Thomas, Tex. Civ. App. 1920, 217 S. W. 1068 ; McKane v. Adams, 1890, 123 N. Y. 609 , 25 N. E. 1057 , 20 Am. St. Rep. 785 . 4 Am.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Davidson v. Sewer Improvement District

    182 Ark. 741 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 24, 1930

    Digest, which prohibits any member of a board of improvement from being interested, either directly or indirectly, in any contract made by the board for or on behalf of the improvement district. … Roberts v. Street Imp. Dist., 156 Ark. 248 , 245 S. W. 489 ; Harrison v. Abington, 140 Ark. 115 , 215 S. W. 255 . In the case of Miller v. Seymour, 156 Ark. 273 , 245 S.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Vogler v. O'NEAL

    226 Ark. 1007 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 26, 1956

    We said in Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Arkansas v. Adcox, 189 Ark. 610 , 74 S. … R. 2d 203, in which is cited with approval, the case of Ross v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • City of Fort Smith v. McCutchen

    372 Ark. 541 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 6, 2008

    There, we explained that [t]he Planning Commission, sitting as a Board of Adjustment has no power to legislate. … If de novo review of actions by administrative boards and commissions were not allowed a board or commission might act arbitrarily or unreasonably or even conceal the real facts and thereby protect such acts from proper review

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Lyle v. Latourette

    209 Ark. 721 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 11, 1946

    One of the specifications called for ceiling the attic with insulation board or beaver board. … Lyle asked judgment for $330.57 as the amount required to take off the $4 inch wall board and replace it with % inch insulation board.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Watson v. Frierson

    272 Ark. 316 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 13, 1981

    Munn v. State, 257 Ark. 1057 , 521 S.W. 2d 535 (1975). Appellant cites us to Newton & Fitzgerald v. Clark, 266 Ark. 237 , 582 S.W. 2d 955 (1979) and Jones v. City of Forrest City, 239 Ark. 211 , 388 S.W. 2d 386 (1965). … Co. v. Touzin, 267 Ark. 539 , 592 S.W. 2d 447 (1980) and Judy v. McDaniel, 247 Ark. 409 , 445 S.W. 2d 722 (1969).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Conway County Bridge District

    142 Ark. 1 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 26, 1920

    Co. v. Conway County Bridge Dist. … Co. v. Commissioners, 112 U.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Wade v. Goza

    78 Ark. 7 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 17, 1906

    Brown, James Brown and Henry Love, and that the bill of exceptions sets forth the decree of the Chicot Chancery Court at the adjourned term beginning September 25, 1882, which appellee contends renders the sale and donation … See Bender v. Bean, 52 Ark. 132 ; McGann v. Smith, 65 Ark. 305 ; Cowley v. Spradlin, 77 Ark. 190 ; Cowley v. Thompson, 77 Ark. 186 .

    Cited 10 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.