Case law

Burnett v. State

287 Ark. 158 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 14, 1985

Brown testified about the cause of the injuries. She discounted the appellants’ explanation for the injuries. … In Spears v.

Pate v. Bryan

177 Ark. 79 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 27, 1928

This -case is unlike Hine v. Brown, 135 Ark. 393 , 205 S. W. 657 , and Geyer & Adams Co. v. Bank of Central Arkansas, 170 Ark. 1016 , 282 S. W. 358 , which appellees insist are in point and controlling here. … Geyer & Adams Co. v. Bank of Central Arkansas, 170 Ark. 1016 , 282 S. W. 358 .

City of Little Rock v. Sawyer

228 Ark. 516 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 20, 1958

As was stated in State Highway Commission v. Carder, 228 Ark. 8 , 305 S. … Smith and Van Buren Bridge District v. Scott, 103 Ark. 405 , 147 S.

Silkman v. Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society

474 S.W.3d 74 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 12, 2015

Brown v. … Poff v. Brown, 374 Ark. 453, 288 S.W.3d 620 (2008).

City of Fordyce v. Vaughn

300 Ark. 554 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 11, 1989

City of Little Rock v. Raines, 241 Ark. 1071 , 411 S.W.2d 486 (1967). … See also City of Searcy v. Roberson, 224 Ark. 344 , 273 S.W.2d 26 (1954).

Murphy v. Marshall

203 Ark. 986 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 9, 1942

Such was the testimony of a majority of the members of both old boards, and no member of either of the old boards definitely disputed that fact. … Wright v. Lake, 178 Ark. 1184 , 13 S. W. 2d 826 ; Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Cowan, 184 Ark. 75 , 41 S. W. 2d 748 . Nor do we think the payment 'of $530.07 to the auditor constituted an accord and satisfaction.

Fiser v. Clayton

221 Ark. 528 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 26, 1953

Harlow v. Ryland, 78 Fed. Supp. 488, 172 Fed. 2d 784. But this power — that is, the police power as the term is generally defined — is not without limitations. Bennett v. City of Hope, 204 Ark. 147 , 161 S. W. 2d 186 . … Ritholz v. Ark. State Board of Optometry, 206 Ark. 671 , 177 S. W. 2d 410 .

Birnie v. Main

29 Ark. 591 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 15, 1874

Harris v. King, 16 Ark., 122; Whiteside v. Jackson, 1 Wend., 418 ; Jackson v. Walker, 7 Cow., 637 ; Lingan v. Henderson, 1 Bland, 236 ; Moreton v. Harrison, id., 491; Driver v. Hudspeth, 16 Ala., 348 ; Relfe v. … Brown, 11 Mich., 25 ; 2 Smith’s Lead. Cas., 273.

Reed v. Baker

254 Ark. 631 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 4, 1973

See Brown v. Anderson, 210 Ark. 970 , 198 S.W. 2d 188 ; Walton v. Rucker, 193 Ark. 40 , 97 S.W. 2d 442 ; Kirk v. Hartlieb, 193 Ark. 37 , 97 S.W. 2d 434 . … See Hailey v. Barker, 193 Ark. 101 , 97 S.W. 2d 923 ; Bland v. Benton, 171 Ark. 805 , 286 S.W. 976 ; Davis v. Moore, 70 Ark. 240 , 67 S.W. 311 . Still, we have considered a contest to be a cause of action. Brown v.

Bank of Little Rock v. McCarthy

55 Ark. 473 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 20, 1892

Co. v. … Co. v. Holmes, admr., 68 Mo., 601 ; Stevens v. Eden Meeting-house Society, 12 Vt., 688 ; Gordon v. Preston, 1 Watts., 385 ; Jackson v. Hampden, 16 Me., 186; Farwell v. Houghton Copper Works, 8 Fed. Rep., 66; State v.

Gibson v. Herriott

55 Ark. 85 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 14, 1891

In Smith v. Clay, 3 Brown, Ch. … Marsh v. Whitmore, 21 Wall., 178 ; McGaughey v. Brown, 46 Ark., 25. So in Sullivan v. Portland, etc., R. Co., 94 U.

Freeman v. State

258 Ark. 617 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 13, 1975

Hardin v. State, 66 Ark. 53 , 48 S.W. 904 ; Brown v. State, supra. … Co. v. Fuqua, 114 Ark. 112 , 169 S.W. 786 ; Brown v. Brown, 181 Ark. 528 , 27 S.W. 2d 85 ; Duff v. Ayers, 156 Ark. 17 , 246 S.W. 508 ; Poinsett Lumber & Mfg. Co. v.

Stehle v. Zimmerebner

497 S.W.3d 188 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 30, 2016

See C.R.T., Inc. v. Brown, 269 Ark. 114 , 602 S.W.2d 409 (1980) (asphalt company ignored injunction and thus caused injuries to plaintiffs cattle). 2 These damages are both nonpunitive and avoidable. Mine Workers v. … See, e.g., Brown v. Brown, 305 Ark. 493 , 809 S.W.2d 808 (1991); Aswell, 88 Ark.App. 115 , 195 S.W.3d. 365.

State Ex Rel. Independence County v. Tad Screen Advertising Co.

199 Ark. 205 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 13, 1939

This conclusion is supported by the decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States in Browning v. Waycross, 233 U. S. 16 , 34 S. Ct. 578 , 58 L. Ed. 828 , and General Railway Signal Co. v. Virginia, 246 U. … The situation is controlled by the same principle as were the cases of Browning v. Waycross, 233 U. S. 16 , 34 S. Ct. 578 , 58 L. Ed. 828 ; General Railway Signal Co. v. Virginia, 246 U. S. 500 , 38 S. Ct. 360 , 62 L.

Deboha v. Summerlin

266 Ark. 1037 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 24, 1979

Quapaw Quarter Ass’n v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, 261 Ark. 74 , 546 S.W. 2d 427 (1977); and City of Little Rock v. Kaufman, 249 Ark. 530 , 460 S.W. 2d 88 (1970). We find there was. … See, e.g., City of Little Rock v. Kaufman, supra, and Zoning Flexibility: Bored of Adjustment?, 30 Ark. L. Rev. 491 , 509 (1977), and cases cited there.

Middleton v. Lockhart

344 Ark. 572 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 26, 2001

Appellants cite Bakker v. Ralston, 326 Ark 575 , 932 S.W.2d 325 (1996), and Brown v. Tucker, 330 Ark. 435 , 954 S.W.2d 262 (1997), as support for their position. … In Bakker and Brown, the same cause of action was dismissed twice.

Beaumont v. Faubus

239 Ark. 801 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 11, 1965

Faitoute Iron & Steel Co. v. Asbury Park, supra; Tipton v. Smythe, 78 Ark. 392 , 94 S. W. 678 ; Fulkerson v. Refunding Board of Arkansas, 201 Ark. 957 , 147 S. W. 2d 980 . … See discussion in City of Albuqiherque v. Gott, supra. This court has approved the concept of refunding by sale. Fulkerson v. Refunding Board of Arkansas, supra.

Haynes v. State

314 Ark. 354 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 11, 1993

See Jackson v. State, 306 Ark. 70 , 811 S.W.2d 299 (1991); Simmons v. State, 278 Ark. 305 , 645 S.W.2d 680 (1983). As this court noted in Brown v. … Brown v. State, supra; French v. State, 256 Ark. 298 , 506 S.W.2d 820 (1974). For his second point for reversal, Haynes contends that the victim misidentified him as the man who raped and robbed her.

Ford v. Keith

338 Ark. 487 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 22, 1999

Wright v. Arkansas State Plant Board, 311 Ark. 125, 130 , 842 S.W.2d 42 (1992). … P. 81(a); See also Whitlock v. G.P.W. Nursing Home, Inc., 283 Ark. 158 , 672 S.W.2d 48 (1984) and Wright v. Arkansas State Plant Board, 311 Ark. 125 , 842 S.W.2d 42 (1992).

Oyler v. Semple

163 Ark. 620 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 21, 1924

Of course, appellant could not collect for board, which had been paid for by services. … Skillern v. Baker, 82 Ark. 86 . In addition to that, there was some testimony to the effect that services were performed for appellant by appellee’s wife while she was staying there.