Case law

Morrow v. County Commissioners of Saline County

21 Kan. 484 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 15, 1879

V. R. W. will be paid promptly when due. “Yours truly, H. F. Woolley, “Chairman Board County Comm’rs.” , Of all these facts McMillan had knowledge at the time he purchased. … (McArthur v. Mitchell, 7 Kas. 173 .)

Bank of Little Rock v. McCarthy

55 Ark. 473 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 20, 1892

Co. v. … Co. v. Holmes, admr., 68 Mo., 601 ; Stevens v. Eden Meeting-house Society, 12 Vt., 688 ; Gordon v. Preston, 1 Watts., 385 ; Jackson v. Hampden, 16 Me., 186; Farwell v. Houghton Copper Works, 8 Fed. Rep., 66; State v.

Hicks v. State

325 Ark. 192 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 24, 1996

Consistent with our direction in Hicks v. … See, e.g., Brown v. State, 321 Ark. 282 , 900 S.W.2d 954 (1995) (per curiam). We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion.

Beaumont v. Faubus

239 Ark. 801 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 11, 1965

Faitoute Iron & Steel Co. v. Asbury Park, supra; Tipton v. Smythe, 78 Ark. 392 , 94 S. W. 678 ; Fulkerson v. Refunding Board of Arkansas, 201 Ark. 957 , 147 S. W. 2d 980 . … See discussion in City of Albuqiherque v. Gott, supra. This court has approved the concept of refunding by sale. Fulkerson v. Refunding Board of Arkansas, supra.

Wright v. Samson

248 Ark. 1141 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 22, 1970

Lyle Brown, Justice. The appellants are Jimmy C. Harris and Andrew Wright; the appellees are Dean Samson, George Gray, Jim Bass, Harold Archer, Julian Foster, and Old American Life Insurance Company. … See Vandeventer v. Davis, 92 Ark. 604 , 123 S. W. 766 (1909).

Burton v. State

82 Ark. 595 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 6, 1907

In Palmore v. State, 29 Ark. 248 , this court said: “Threats are admissible when they tend to explain or palliate the conduct oc the accused. … Harper v. State, 79 Ark. 594 ; Long v. State, 76 Ark. 495 ; Long v. State, 72 Ark. 427 ; Bell v. State, 69 Ark. 149 ; King v. State, 55 Ark. 604 ; Brown v. State, 55 Ark. 593 .

Carter Sp. Sch. Dist. v. Hollis Sp. Sch. Dist.

173 Ark. 781 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 25, 1927

No. 25 v. Pyatt Special School Dist., 172 Ark. 602 , 289 S.W. 778 ; Park v. Rural Special School Dist. No. 26, ante p. 514; and Helvering v. McDougal, 119 Ark. 162 , 177 S.W. 937 . … In Lepanto Special School District v.

Kimberling v. Rogers

227 Ark. 221 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 21, 1957

There was a habeas corpus proceeding (see Kimberling v. Rogers, 223 Ark. 348 , 265 S. W. 2d 952 ); and we affirmed the judgment of the Circuit Court, which had awarded the custody to the mother. … Appellant cites Brown v. Brown, 218 Ark. 624 , 238 S. W. 2d 482 , and Griffen v. Newcom, 219 Ark. 146 , 240 S. W. 2d 648 , as justifying a reversal of the Chancellor’s decree. Appellee cites Perkins v.

Greene v. Thompson

227 Ark. 1089 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 1, 1957

In Morris v. Boyd, 110 Ark. 468 , 162 S. … Other cases to the same effect are Union National Bank v. Kirby, 189 Ark. 369 , 72 S. W. 2d 229 ; and Atkinson v. Lyle, 191 Ark. 61 , 85 S. W. 2d 715 .

Jones v. Horn

51 Ark. 19 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 15, 1888

McClure v. Hill, 36 Ark., 268; Street v. Sinclair, 71 Ala., 110 ; Chamberlin v. Shaw, 18 Pick., 278 ; Brinck v. Freoff, 44 Mich., 69 ; Brown v.

Sloan v. ARK. RURAL MED. PRAC. SCHOLAR. BD.

255 S.W.3d 834 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 26, 2007

In Arkco Corp. v. … Comm'n v.

Beavers v. Myar

68 Ark. 333 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 30, 1900

Couch v. McKee, 6 Ark. 484 ; Fayetteville B. & L. Assn. v. Bowlin, 63 Ark. 573 ; Cooley, Constitutional Lim. (4th Ed.) 411, and cases cited. … Porter v. Hanley, 10 Ark. 195 ; St. L. I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. Alexander, 49 Ark. 192 ; Wade, Retroactive Laws, § 34. The legislature possesses no power to divest legal or equitable rights previously vested. Brown v.

Dotson v. Ritchie

211 Ark. 789 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 2, 1947

That the duties of canvassing boards are purely ministerial has been definitely and frequently' decided by this court. Howard v. McDiardmid, 23 Ark. 100 ; Patton v. Coates, 41 Ark. 111 ; Willeford v. … State, 43 Ark. 62 ; Wheat v. Smith, 50 Ark. 266 , 7 S. W. 161 ; Pitts v. Stuckert, 111 Ark. 388 , 163 S. W. 1173 .

Middleton v. Lockhart

344 Ark. 572 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 26, 2001

Appellants cite Bakker v. Ralston, 326 Ark 575 , 932 S.W.2d 325 (1996), and Brown v. Tucker, 330 Ark. 435 , 954 S.W.2d 262 (1997), as support for their position. … In Bakker and Brown, the same cause of action was dismissed twice.

Greer v. Levee District No. 3

140 Ark. 60 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 6, 1919

See Bank of Hartford v. McDonald, 107 Ark. 239 ; City Electric R. R. Co. v. … This act of the board of directors was not ultra vires.

Jackson v. Richardson

182 Ark. 997 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 22, 1930

Co. v. Fuqua, 114 Ark. 112 , 169 S. W. 786 ; Paragould & M. R. Co. v. Smith, 93 Ark. 224 , 124 S. W. 776 ; St. L. I. M. & S. R. Co. v. Owens, 103 Ark. 61 , 145 S. W. 879 ; Mo. Pac. Rd. Co. v. Hull, ante p. 873. … White v. White, 52 Ark. 188 , 12 S. W. 201 . In the case of Goodwin v. Parnell, 69 Ark. 629 , 65 S.

Gay v. State

506 S.W.3d 851 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 8, 2016

On the prosecution’s motion, the circuit court excused Brown for cause. However, Gay did not object or preserve the issue for review. The record demonstrates that Gay did not object below after Brown had been struck. … See Franklin v. Lynaugh, 487 U.S. 164, . . . (1988); Mitchell v. State, 527 So. 2d 179 (Fla. 1988). Id.; see also Nooner v.

Beloate v. Street Improvement District No. 2

203 Ark. 899 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 9, 1942

Swicord, Deceased) Board of Commissioners of said Improvement District, plaintiffs, v. Delinquent Lands, defendants.” … Burton v. Harris, 202 Ark. 696 , 152 S. W. 2d 529 , and Lawrence County v. Townsend, 202 Ark. 887 , 154 S. W. 2d 4 . Finding no error, the decree is affirmed.

Higginbotham v. Road Improvement District No. 3

154 Ark. 112 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 5, 1922

Salmon v. … The same principle is applicable as that announced by this court in the cases of Rayder v. Warrick, 133 Ark. 491 ; Hout v. Harvey, 135 Ark. 102 , and Carson v. Road Imp.

Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Holder

117 Ark. 210 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 22, 1915

Co. v. … Co. v. Brown, 234 U. S. 542 , 58 L. Ed. 1457 . In a later case of Western Union Tel. Co. v. Johnson, 115 Ark. 564 , 171 S. W.