Case law

Stone v. State

348 Ark. 661 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 16, 2002

Haynes v. State, supra; Thomas v. State, 312 Ark. 158 , 847 S.W.2d 695 (1993); Brown v. State, 309 Ark. 503 , 832 S.W.2d 477 (1992). … Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590 (1975). This court has previously held that a lapse of time can dissipate the taint of illegal police conduct. See, e.g., Mitchell v.

Eagle v. Fencing District No. 2

91 Ark. 378 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 12, 1909

In any event, as was said in the case of Board of Improvement Dist. v. … It was the duty of the board to erect the fence, and the district was liable for the cost of it. Altheimer v. Board, etc., Plum Bayou Levee Dist., 79 Ark. 232 .

Cone v. Garner

175 Ark. 860 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 14, 1927

Board of Chosen Freeholders of Hudson County v. Kaiser, 75 N. J. Law 9, 69 Atl. 25 . … Hickey v. State, 114 Ark. 526 , 170 S. W. 562 .

Henry v. Johnson

292 Ark. 446 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 15, 1987

Kizer, 260 Ark. 656 , 543 S.W.2d 458 (1976); Stain v. Stain, 286 Ark. 140 , 689 S.W.2d 256 (1985); and Jarmon v. Brown, 286 Ark. 455 , 692 S.W.2d 618 (1985). … This concern was also reflected in the concurring opinion of two justices in Jarmon v. Brown, supra. This concurrence also specifically objected to the broad language in Rapp v. Kizer, supra.

St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Miller County

67 Ark. 498 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 24, 1900

It requires that such property shall be assessed by the board of railroad commissioners, and taxed as a whole. … Co. v. Missouri, 152 U. S. 301 ; St. L., I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. Berry, 113 ib. 465; St. L., I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. Berry, 41 Ark. 509 ; 2 Morawetz, Corp. § 944.

Dunn v. Dauley

232 Ark. 17 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 11, 1960

In the case of Herring v. Stannus, 169 Ark. 244 , 275 S. … Likewise in the case of McKinney v. City of Little Rock, 201 Ark. 618 , 146 S.

Fairview School District No. 7 v. Mammoth Spring School District No. 2

189 Ark. 74 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 16, 1934

Burrow, “President of Board of Directors, Fairview School District No. 7. ' “E. L. Stevenin, “Secretary of Board of Directors, Fairview School District Nq. 7. “John L. … Burrow, “Treasurer of Board of Directors of Fairview School Dist. No. 7.”

Lewis v. Conlee

258 Ark. 715 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 27, 1975

In the case of Cochran, Mayor v. … This court so held in the case of Kirkwood v.

Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Freeman

121 Ark. 124 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 8, 1915

Co. v. Johnson, 115 Ark. 564 , 171 S. W. 859 . In that case we followed the ruling of the Supreme Court of the United States in Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Brown, 234 U. … .; Plummer v. Reeves, 83 Ark. 10 ; Jones v. Seymour, 95 Ark. 593 ; Brown v.

St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Hudson

95 Ark. 506 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 27, 1910

The testimony on behalf of. appellant tended to show that appellee, when he attempted to board appellant’s train, was drunk; that because of that fact the conductor refused to permit him to board the train; that, on being … Southern Anthracite Coal Co. v. Bowen, 93 Ark. 140 , and cases cited. See also St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. Rogers, 93 Ark. 564 .

Hilger v. Chrisp

98 Ark. 490 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 3, 1911

Willamette Iron Bridge Co. v. Hatch, 125 U. S. 1 ; Montgomery v. Portland, 190 U. S. 89 ; Langton v. New York, 93 N. Y. 129 ; 29 Cyc. 295. … It is urged iby counsel for appellant that the plans and specifications adopted by the said board of bridge commissioners were not so definite in detail as required by law. In the case of Fones Hdw. Co. v.

Neal v. Bethea

158 Ark. 403 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 23, 1923

Bice v. School District No. 20, 109 Ark. 125M29. 2. … In School District v.

Union Indemnity Co. v. Benton County Lumber Co.

179 Ark. 752 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 10, 1929

Hill v. Trezevant & Cochran, 123 Ark. 244 , 185 S. W. 280 ; Glenn v. Union Bank & Trust Co., 150 Ark. 42 , 233 S. W. 798 ; Snodgrass v. Shader, 113 Ark. 429 , 168 S. W. 567 . … Co. v. Stove Mfg. Co., 164 Ark. 359 , 261 S. W. 917 ; and see also DeKlyn v. Gould, 165 N. Y. 282 , 59 N. E. 95 , and Rice v. Culver, 172 N. Y. 60 , 64 N. E. 761 .

McClelland v. Paris Public Schools

294 Ark. 292 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 19, 1988

Wardwell v. Board of Education, supra; Mogle v. Sevier County School Dist., 540 F.2d 478 (1976); Cook County College Teacher Union Local 1600 v. Taylor, 432 F. Supp. 270 (1977); Carofano v. … There has been some rejection of school boards’ residency policies. Donnelly v. City of Manchester, 111 N.H. 50 , 274 A.2d 789 (1971); Angwin v.

Andrew Kimbrell v. John Thurston, in His Official Capacity as Secretary of State for the State of Arkansas

611 S.W.3d 186 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 3, 2020

In Lott v. … Likewise, in Fite v.

Diffie v. Anderson

137 Ark. 151 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 20, 1919

These facts make peculiarly applicable the language of this court in the case of Thomas v. Thomas, supra, where, in the application of the doctrine of the case of Campbell v. … This credit for board and clothing covered a period almost entirely prior, to his appointment as guardian for Ms son.

Marks v. F. G. Barton Cotton Company

170 Ark. 637 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 1, 1926

Cockrell v. Warner, 14 Ark. 345 ; Sale v. McLean, 29 Ark. 612 ; Radcliffe v. Scruggs, 46 Ark. 96 ; and Hall v. Huff, 114 Ark. 206 . The reason for the rule is clearly stated in Cockrell v. … Burke v. Napoleon Hill Cotton Co., 134 Ark. 580 ; Joy Rice Milling Co. v. Brown, 167 Ark. 205 ; and Brown v. Southern Grocery Co., 168 Ark. 547 .

Skiver v. State

336 Ark. 86 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 14, 1999

He was carrying a large brown paper bag in one hand and a beer in the other. Ms. … In Carton v.

Collar v. Crowley

202 Ark. 1159 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 10, 1941

It was said in the case of Fleming v. Weaver, 98 Ark. 455 , 136 S. … The language just quoted appears in the opinion in the case of Van Etten v. Daughterty, 83 Ark. 534 , 103 S.

Special School District No. 50 v. Deason

181 Ark. 208 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 3, 1930

The decree entered by the clerk, however, dissolved the board’s order, which was then pending on anpeal to the circuit court. This decree was entered at the April term, 1929. … If the order of the county board is void, certiorari may be resorted to. McCrory Special School Dist. v. Curtis, 174, Ark. 343, 295 S. W. 971 .