Case law

Ark. Racing Commission v. Hot Springs Kennel Club, Inc.

232 Ark. 504 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 3, 1960

In the case of Merchants & Planters Bank v. Fitzgerald, 61 Ark. 605 , 33 S. … W. 1041 ; Dixie Downs, Inc. v. Arkansas Racing Commission, 219 Ark. 356 , 242 S. W. 2d 132 , and North Hill Memorial Gardens v. Hicks, 230 Ark. 787 , 326 S. W. 2d 797 .

ARKANSAS DEMOCRAT GAZZETTE v. Zimmerman

341 Ark. 771 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 29, 2000

Gazette Co. v. Lofton, 269 Ark. 109 , 598 S.W.2d 745 (1980) (writ of mandamus); Brown v. Kimbrough, Judg., 263 Ark. 913 , 568 S.W.2d 226 (1978) (writ of prohibition); Wood v. … In Brown v.

McLaughlin, Trustee v. Lovett

204 Ark. 708 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 13, 1942

Mallory v. Hiles, 61 Ky. (4 Met.) 53 ; Kennedy v. Palmer, 72 Mass. 316 .” … (Arnold, et al. v. The United States, 9 Cranch 104 , 3 L. Ed. 671 .” The Supreme Court of the United States in Lapeyre v. United States, 84 U. S. 606 , 21 L.

Arkansas Central Railroad v. State

72 Ark. 252 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 27, 1904

Said boards shall be elevated so as not to obstruct travel, and to be easily seen by travelers; and on each side of said board shall be painted, in capital letters of at least thd size of nine inches each, the words 'Railroad … Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. Russell, 115 Ill. 52, 57 ; Kansas Pacific Railway Co. v.

Flemens v. Harris

323 Ark. 421 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 12, 1996

Co. v. Humphreys, 107 Ark. 330 , 155 S.W. 127 (1916), and damage to property resulting from construction of a power plant, Brown v. Arkansas Central Power Co., 174 Ark. 177 , 294 S.W. 709 (1927). … Russell Brown & Co., supra, was decided in 1989 upon the same rule as Chapman, and it also conflicts with the analysis in Midwest Mutual.

Cross County Road Improvement District No. 4 v. Henderson

167 Ark. 75 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 22, 1924

Hiter v. Harahan, Viaduct Imp. Dist., 165 Ark. 351 ; Wagner v. Lesser, 239 U. S. 207 ; Valley Farms Co. v. County of Westchester, 261 U. S. 155 . … Van Dyke v. Mack, 139 Ark. 524 ; Hill v. Echols, 140 Ark. 474 ; Tatum v. Wallis, 146 Ark. 287 ; Sanders v. Wilmans, 160 Ark. 133 .

Woodrome v. Daniels

370 S.W.3d 190 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 20, 2010

Justice Brown’s dissenting opinion in Ward v. … See Block v.

Wesley v. Baker

153 Ark. 529 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 15, 1922

protest of the directors wa,s pending in the circuit court on appeal from said board. … Mitchell v. Directors of School Dist. No. 15, ante p. 50; Acree v. Patterson, ante p. 188.

Railway v. Williams

53 Ark. 58 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 15, 1890

The requirement as to railways is that every corporation or other person “owning or operating’’ a railway shall return its road to the state board for taxation; and in estimating the value the board is required to take into … Varner v. Rice, 44 Ark., 236.

Delta Special School District No. 5 v. McGehee Special School District No. 17

280 Ark. 489 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 31, 1983

After the petition has been approved by the Board of Directors of the resident district and the Board of Directors of the receiving district, copies of such written consent shall be filed in the office of the County Clerk … Cord-Charlotte School District No. 8 v. Independence County Board of Education, 271 Ark. 217 , 608 S.W.2d 12 (1980).

Baker v. Gowers

180 Ark. 1110 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 10, 1930

Frauenthal & Schwartz v. Bank of El Paso, 170 Ark. 326 , 280 S. W. 1001 , 44 A. L. R. 871. … Van Hoozer to her grandson, Fenner Brown Baker, may be regarded a voluntary conveyance, it must be remembered that Mrs. Van Hoozer was not indebted to any of the creditors of the corporation, nor to F. B.

Winn v. Little Rock

165 Ark. 11 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 9, 1924

Wallace v. Brown, 22 Ark. 118 ; Hunt v. Curry, 37 Ark. 100 ; Kelso v. Robinson, 51 Ark. 397 ; see also 37 Cyc. 1469 (b); 26 E. C. L. § 399, p. 443. The judgment is correct, and it is therefore affirmed.

City of Little Rock v. Kaufman

249 Ark. 530 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 23, 1970

Section 43-22(4) of the City Code defines the authority of the Board of Adjustment as follows: . . . “The board shall have the following powers and it shall be its duty. . . … In Williams v. Kuehnert, 243 Ark. 746 , 421 S. W. 2d 896 (1967), we affirmed the action of the trial court under circumstances much more favorable to those appellants than the appellant has shown here. Affirmed.

Andrews v. Heirs of Bellis

297 Ark. 3 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 31, 1988

Browning. Browning, on November 11, 1915, conveyed the property to B. F. Crotts without reserving any interest in the property. On June 14, 1929, John A. … Davis v. Hale, 114 Ark. 426 , 170 S.W. 99 (1914). The curative statute was again considered by this court in the case of Pardo v.

Bostick v. Pernot

165 Ark. 581 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 20, 1924

See Johnson v. Hamlen, 148 Ark. 634 ; Castle v. Sanders, 160 Ark. 391 . This case is clearly differentiated from the cases of Voss v. Reyburn, 104 Ark. 298 , and McRaven v. Clancy, 115 Ark. 163 . … Conway v. Commissioners of Board of Improvement Dist. No. 20, ante, p. 487, and cases cited. The decree is in all things correct, and it is therefore affirmed.

Sallee v. Bank of Corning

122 Ark. 502 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 6, 1916

In the case of Haynes v. … In Hunnicutt v.

City of Little Rock v. Williams

206 Ark. 861 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 21, 1944

These consisted of the removal of a beaver board partition at 1922 Wright avenue and cutting a few feet off of the top of another beaver board partition and moving it forward a few feet. … Board of Zoning Appeals, 177 Md. 426 , 9 Atl. 2d 747, that the question of an existing use is not to be determined as of the date of the passage of the ordinance, and the case of DeFelice v.

Bennett v. Miller

186 Ark. 413 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 31, 1932

Thereafter appellees filed a petition with the county board of education as provided by § 30 of act 169 of 1931, seeking to have thrown out all ballots on which stickers appeared as illegal, and that the county board recount … the legal ballots and the result declared by the county board.

St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Hambright

87 Ark. 614 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 2, 1908

Co. v. Brown, 69 S. W. (Tex.) 651, an employee of the railroad company was injured, and was taken to a hospital, where 'he was treated by Dr. Stewart, the surgeon of the railroad company. … Jordan v. Fenno, 13 Ark. 593 ; Gauss v. Doyle, 46 Ark. 122 ; Colonial & U. S. Mortg. Co. v. Jeter, 71 Ark. 185 .

Howard v. Tri-State Insurance

253 Ark. 405 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 6, 1972

Lyle Brown, Justice. This case originated from an intersection collision between Worlick Howard, appellant, and a fire truck owned by the city of Paragould and insured by appellee, Tri-State Insurance Company. … Smith v. Alexander, 245 Ark. 567 , 433 S.W. 2d 157 (1968). An erroneous instruction which is likely to mislead the jury is prejudicial. Johnston v. Pennington, 105 Ark. 278 , 150 S.W. 863 (1912).