Case law

Universal Life Ins. Co. v. Howlett

240 Ark. 458 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 14, 1966

Ann., § 28-358 (Repl. 1962); Young v. Dodson, 239 Ark. 143 , 388 S. W. 2d 94 (1965); Brown v. Lewis, 231 Ark. 976 , 334 S. W. 2d 225 (1960). The complaint stated a cause of action. … Ann. § 29-211 (c); Jones v. Comer, 237 Ark. 500 , 374 S. W. 2d 465 (1964). Affirmed.

Thacker v. State

253 Ark. 864 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 29, 1973

Brown v. State, 252 Ark. 846 , 481 S.W. 2d 366 ; Nash v. State, 248 Ark. 323 , 451 S.W. 2d 869 ; Striplin v. State, 100 Ark. 132 , 139 S. W. 1128 ; Walker v. State, 100 Ark. 180 , 139 S.W. 1139 . … Brown v. State, 252 Ark. 846 (1972), 481 S.W. 2d 366 ; Ridgeway v. State, 251 Ark. 157 , 472 S.W. 2d 108 ; Poe v. State, 251 Ark. 35 , 470 S.W. 2d 818 .

Austin v. Crawford County

30 Ark. 578 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 15, 1875

.: John Austin presented his petition to the board of supervisors of Crawford County, to have refunded to him certain excess in county taxes paid by him for the year 1872. … Lockhart, Grady and Kines, were not parties to the proceedings before the board of supervisors, and according to the decision in the case of Chicot County v.

Paving District No. 2 of Harrison v. Johnson

186 Ark. 1033 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 27, 1933

In 1929, acting-pursuant of an order of the board of commissioners, the board of assessors reassessed the benefits against the real property of the district, notice of which was duly published and said readjusted assessment … Section 5664 of Crawford & Moses’ Digest, authorizing a reassessment of benefits, was construed by this court in Street Improvement District No. 74 v. Goslee, 183 Ark. 539 , 36 S.

Stacy v. Edwards

178 Ark. 911 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 21, 1929

Co. v. Alverson, 168 Ark. 666 , 271 S. W. 27 . … Bowen v. Cook, 14 Ark. 202 ; Howcott v. Kilbourn, 44 Ark. 213 ; White v. Beal & Fletcher Gro. Co., 65 Ark. 278 , 45 S. W. 1060 ; Naylor v. McNair, 92 Ark. 345 , 122 S. W. 662 .

Curtis & Co. Manufacturing v. Williams

48 Ark. 325 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 15, 1886

Brown to call on him for payment. We brought suit and recovered our money. In circuit court plaintiff filed counter-claim, but withdrew it. … Benjamín on Sales, secs. 645, 657, et seq.; 1 Parsons on Contracts, 586; Brown v. Edgington, 2 Man. & G., 279; Jones v. Just, L. R., 3 Q. B., 197; Harris v. Waite, 51 Vt., 481 ; S. C., 31 Am. Rep., 694 ; Rodgers v.

Ruff v. Womack

174 Ark. 971 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 3, 1927

Hayes v. McDaniel, Treasurer, 130 Ark. 52 , 196 S. W. 934 ; Bank of Commerce v. Huddleston, 172 Ark. 999 , 291 S. W. 422 ; Bush v. Martineau, ante p. 214. … Bank of Commerce v. Huddleston, and Bush v. Martineau, supra.

Witmer v. Arkansas Dailies, Inc.

202 Ark. 470 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 12, 1941

Gossard Company v. Helene C. Crosby, 132 Iowa 155 , 109 N. W. 483 , 6 L. R. A., N. … Brown wronged it by .any act as directors.

Jackson v. Foster

192 Ark. 712 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 11, 1936

Applegate, “Chairman of Board of Commissioners. “Attest: (Signed) W. E. Jackson, Secretary.” … See Board of St. Imp. Dist. No. 315 v. Arkansas Highway Comm., 190 Ark. 1045 , 83 S. W. (2d) 81 ; Smith v. Refunding Board of Ark., 191 Ark. 1 , 83 S. W. (2d) 76 ; Ledbetter v. Hall, 191 Ark. 791 , 87 S. W. (2d) 996 .

Mitchell v. Wright Hill Special School District

162 Ark. 277 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 28, 1924

It is conceded by counsel for appellants that the order of the circuit Court dismissing their appeal was correct, under the ruling in Mitchell v. Directors of School District No. 13, 153 Ark. 50 . … This holding is in accordance with the rule established in Johnson v. West, 89 Ark. 604 , .and several other later decisions of this court. In the case of Johnson v.

Burrow v. Pocahontas School District No. 19

190 Ark. 563 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 11, 1935

There was some agreement or understanding between the board and the teachers as to what tuition should be charged by the teachers for the subscription school, but the board had nothing to do with the collection of the money … No. 65 of Logan County v. Bangs, 144 Ark. 34 , 221 S. W. 1060 .

Grumbles v. Grumbles

245 Ark. 77 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 9, 1968

See: Plant v. Plant, 63 Ark. 128 , 37 S.W. 308 ; Gladfelter v. Gladfelter, 205 Ark. 1019 , 172 S.W. 2d 246 , Lewis v. Lewis, 222 Ark. 743 , 262 S.W. 2d 456 , and McGuire v. McGuire, 231 Ark. 613 , 331 S.W. 2d 257 . … Harris, C.J. & Brown, J. dissent. Carleton Harris, Chief Justice. If the record reflected that Mr.

Handy Dan Improvement Center, Inc. v. Adams

276 Ark. 268 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 1, 1982

Brown, 366 U.S. 599 , 81 S. Ct. 1144 , 6 L. Ed. 2d 563 (1961); and Gallagher v. Crown Kosher Super Market, 366 U.S. 617 , 81 S. Ct. 1122 , 6 L. Ed. 2d 536 (1961). … They offered excerpts from the minutes of the Board of Directors of the City of Little Rock which instructed the city manager to put blue laws last on the priority list of enforcement.

Babb v. Matlock

340 Ark. 263 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 3, 2000

Lawhon Farm Servs. v. Brown, 335 Ark. 272, 279 , 984 S.W.2d 1 , 4 (1998). … BROWN and ImbER, JJ., concur. Arnold, C.J., and Thornton, J., dissent.

Wabbaseka School District No. 7 v. Johnson

225 Ark. 982 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 13, 1956

As said in the case of Sirmon v. Roberts, 209 Ark. 586 , 191 S. W. 2d 824 , this statute tends to eliminate uncertainties and possible controversy. … There is no conflict, as contended by appellant, between the conclusion we have reached and the holding in Johnson v. Wert, 225 Ark. 91 , 279 S. W. 2d 274 .

St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Hix

101 Ark. 90 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 20, 1911

He failed to board the train because, as he claimed, it did not stop; and, as-he attempted to board it while it passed slowly by, he was thrown down and injured. … Osborn v. LeMaire, 82 Ark. 491 . On the other branch of the case, the jury awarded damages in the sum of $400, which we think is clearly excessive.

Fort Smith District v. Eberle

125 Ark. 350 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 2, 1916

Cotham v. Coffman, 111 Ark. 115 . … Cotham v. Coffman, supra. It follows that the judgment of the circuit court is erroneous, and it is reversed and the cause dismissed.

Gentry v. Robinson

361 S.W.3d 788 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 17, 2009

Brown, 520 U.S. 397 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997). … Brown, 520 U.S. at 404 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 (emphasis in original).

Taylor v. Bean

234 Ark. 932 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 2, 1962

Garner v. Teamsters etc. Union, 346 U. S. 485 , 98 L. Ed. 228 , 74 S. Ct. 161 ; Weber v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc., 348 U. S. 468 , 99 L. Ed. 546 , 75 S. Ct. 480 . … In a very similar case, Bethlehem Steel Co. v. N. Y. State L. R. B., 330 U. S. 767 , 91 L. Ed. 1234 , 67 S.

Gould Public Schools v. Dobbs

338 Ark. 287 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 1, 1999

The Board, through its school superintendent, sent a letter dated July 27, 1995, terminating Dobbs’s employment, and Dobbs later filed suit, claiming the Board’s action was invalid because the Board failed to comply with … In this appeal, the Gould School Board continues its argument made below that it had the right to terminate Dobbs at will without cause or a hearing. In support of its argument, the Board cites Kimble v.