Case law

United States Bedding Co. v. Andes

105 Ark. 111 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 14, 1912

Beckford v. Menier, 107 N. Y. 407 . … Meyer v. Stone, 46 Ark. 210 ; American Sales Book Co. v. Whitaker, 100 Ark. 360 ; Lee v. Vaughan’s Seed Store, 101 Ark. 69 . In the case of Tarpy v. Bernheimer, 16 N. Y.

Jobe v. Caldwell

99 Ark. 20 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 17, 1911

I concur for the reason that according to the doctrine announced in the cases of Moore v. Alexander, 85 Ark. 171 , and Jobe v. Caldwell, 93 Ark. 503 , no appropriation was made to pay petitioners. … I did not agree to. the decision in Jobe v.

Blaylock v. Herrington

219 Ark. 939 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 4, 1952

The appellee, Ernestine Brown Herrington, brought this suit in replevin to recover possession of a Chevrolet sedan. … A forged deed does not convey title, Williams v. Warren, 214 Ark. 506 , 216 S. W. 2d 879 , and this statute does not lay down a different rule as to automobile titles. Second, it is contended that Mrs.

Morrilton Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Arkansas Valley Savings & Loan Ass'n

243 Ark. 627 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 4, 1967

After an extensive hearing, at which much testimony was heard, the Board granted the charter. The circuit court affirmed the Board’s decision. … Section 67-1811; Izard v. Arkansas Sav. & Loan Assn. Board, 239 Ark. 670 , 393 S. W. 2d 245 (1965). "We find an abundance of proof to show that the new association is needed.

Park v. George

282 Ark. 155 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 2, 1984

In Greenwood v. … We again held in Smith v.

Wimberly v. Road Improvement District No. 7

161 Ark. 79 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 12, 1923

Bennett v. Johnson, 130 Ark. 507 ; Sallee v. Dalton, 138 Ark. 549 ; Summers v. Damascus Road Dist., 139 Ark. 227 ; Easley v. … Bush v. Delta Road Imp. Dist., 141 Ark. 247 ; Van Hook v. Wallace, supra.

Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf Railroad v. Hickey

81 Ark. 579 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 4, 1907

Thompson v. Brazile, 65 Ark. 495 ; Holt County v. Cannon, 114 Mo. 514 ; Witkowski v. Hern, 82 Cal. 604 ; 1 Enc. Pl. & Pr. 573, and cases .cited. … Wood v. Wood, 59 Ark. 446 .

Walthour v. Alexander

243 Ark. 621 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 4, 1967

Campbell v. City of Hot Springs, 232 Ark. 878 , 341 S. W. 2d 225 (1960). … Wright v. Midland Valley R. R., 111 Ark. 196 , 163 S. W. 1151 (1914); National Annuity Assn. v. McCall, 103 Ark. 201 , 146 S. W. 125 , 48 L.R.A. (n.s.) 418 (1912).

Clark v. Farmers Exchange, Inc.

347 Ark. 81 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 29, 2001

Board member Mr. Glenn Featherston testified to problems with the advertising budget, which he stated the board asked Clark to reduce, and instead she increased. … As noted, board members testified that as they neared November 1998, Clark was unable to see well enough or communicate well enough to handle board meetings.

North Little Rock Water Co. v. Water Works Commission

199 Ark. 773 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 29, 1940

Brown, 176 Ark. 774 , 4 S. W. 2d 15 , 58 A. L. R. 534, applied this principle. See, also, Salisbury S Southern Ry. Co. v. Southern Power Co., 179 N. C. 18 , 101 S. E. 593 , 12 A. L. R. 304; People’s Natural Gas Co. v. … W. 2d 383 , arid trie case of Browne v. Bentonville, 94 Ark. 80 , 126 S. W. 93 , is to trie same effect.

Special School District No. 5 v. Special School District No. 3

214 Ark. 514 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 31, 1949

The Board’s order must be sustained unless it is arbitrary and unreasonable. Priest v. Moore, 183 Ark. 999 , 39 S. W. 2d 710 . … Co. v. Martin, 192 Ark. 860 , 96 S. W. 2d 327 . While appellant does not press this point, the failure to file such a motion cannot be waived. Independence County v. Tomlinson, 93 Ark. 382 , 125 S. W. 423 .

Ward v. City of Fort Smith

201 Ark. 1117 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 3, 1941

of the Board of Commissioners in discharging him should be sustained and a consequent judgment that the order of said Board of Commissioners in discharging him be and is hereby sustained and that appellant be discharged … This court said in the case of Mauney v. Millar, 142 Ark. 500 , 219 S.

Jones v. Williams

220 Ark. 555 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 19, 1952

, in their discretion, take a portion of one district and add it to another upon the petition of a majority of the qualified electors, residing in such district from which same is taken, * * V’ Section 80-409 provides: “The … The identical question pr esented has been determined adversely to appellants’ contention by this court in the very recent case of Altus-Denning School District No. 31 v.

Clark v. Arkansas Democrat Co.

242 Ark. 497 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 13, 1967

In the early pase of Harrison v. … Also, see Manzo v. Boulet, 220 Ark. 106 , 246 S. W. 2d 126 (1952) ; Martin v. Street Improvement District No. 349, 180 Ark. 298 , 21 S. W. 2d 430 (1929) ; and Westinghouse Credit Corp. v.

Starling v. State

480 S.W.3d 158 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 28, 2016

‘See Brown v. State, 347 Ark. 44 , 60 S.W.3d 422 (2001); Ellis v. State, 345 Ark. 415 , 47 S.W.3d 259 (2001); Harshaw v. State, 344 Ark. 129 , 39 S.W.3d 753 (2001). … Brown v. State, supra;Rainey v. State, 310 Ark. 419 , 837 S.W.2d 453 (1992); Robinson v. State, 269 Ark. 90 , 598 S.W.2d 421 (1980).

Walsh v. Campbell

240 Ark. 1034 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 6, 1966

We reviewed several cases in Jeffery v. Trevathan, 215 Ark. 311 , 220 S. … Our cases were again reviewed in Campbell v. Ark. State Hospital, 228 Ark. 205 , 306 S.

Bank of Eastern Arkansas v. Bank of Forrest City

94 Ark. 311 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 21, 1910

In the case of People v. … To the same effect, see 2 Page on Contracts, § 1049; Anderson v. Public Schools, 122 Mo. 61 ; Colorado Pav. Co. v. Murphy, 49 U. S. App. 17, 37 L. R. A. 630; State v. Board of Education, 24 Wis. 683 ; People v.

Devaux Legrand Owens v. American Bankers Insurance

242 Ark. 343 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 17, 1967

Lyle BrowN, Justice. This suit was. brought by plaintiffs-appellants against American Bankers Insur-anee Company to cancel an insurance contract and obtain refund of premiums. The complaint was grounded in fraud. … In the field of insurance he has served on the board of directors, of two insurance companies.

Miller v. Tatum

170 Ark. 152 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 18, 1926

Collins v. Hawkins, 77 Ark. 101 ; Nixon v. Grace, 98 Ark. 505 ; Jobe v. Urquhart, 102 Ark. 470 ; Ouachita Power Co. v. Donaghey, 106 Ark. 48 . … Hester v. Bourland, 80 Ark. 145 ; Walls v. Brundidge, 109 Ark. 250 .

Cherry v. Leonard

189 Ark. 869 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 29, 1934

“In the case of Snowden v. Thompson, 106 Ark. 517 , 153 S. W. 823 , the court quoted from the earlier case of Garland Power Development Co. v. State Board of Railroad Incorporation, 94 Ark. 422 , 127 S. … “The ease last cited is that of State ex rel. v. Trulock, 109 Ark. 556 , 165 S. W. 16 . “The more recent ease of Hazelrigg v. Board of Penitentiary Commissioners, 184 Ark. 154 , 140 S.