Case law

Coleman v. Sherrill

189 Ark. 843 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 22, 1934

In the case of Westbrook v. McDonald, 184 Ark. 740 , 43 S. … Phinney v. Trustees, 88 Md. 636 , 42 Atl. 58 .” Mayor of City of Baltimore v. Stewart 92 Md. 535 , 48 Atl. 165, 168 . Mayor and City Council of City of Baltimore v. Fuget, 164 Md. 335 , 105 Atl. 618 -622.

Special School District No. 5 v. Special School District No. 3

214 Ark. 514 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 31, 1949

The Board’s order must be sustained unless it is arbitrary and unreasonable. Priest v. Moore, 183 Ark. 999 , 39 S. W. 2d 710 . … Co. v. Martin, 192 Ark. 860 , 96 S. W. 2d 327 . While appellant does not press this point, the failure to file such a motion cannot be waived. Independence County v. Tomlinson, 93 Ark. 382 , 125 S. W. 423 .

Parker v. Fielding

174 Ark. 1017 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 3, 1927

In McCray v. Cox, 105 Ark. 47 , 150 S. … School Districts 14 and 58 v. Henderson, 146 Art. 338, 226 S. W. 517 .

Morrilton Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Arkansas Valley Savings & Loan Ass'n

243 Ark. 627 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 4, 1967

After an extensive hearing, at which much testimony was heard, the Board granted the charter. The circuit court affirmed the Board’s decision. … Section 67-1811; Izard v. Arkansas Sav. & Loan Assn. Board, 239 Ark. 670 , 393 S. W. 2d 245 (1965). "We find an abundance of proof to show that the new association is needed.

Grumbles v. Grumbles

245 Ark. 77 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 9, 1968

See: Plant v. Plant, 63 Ark. 128 , 37 S.W. 308 ; Gladfelter v. Gladfelter, 205 Ark. 1019 , 172 S.W. 2d 246 , Lewis v. Lewis, 222 Ark. 743 , 262 S.W. 2d 456 , and McGuire v. McGuire, 231 Ark. 613 , 331 S.W. 2d 257 . … Harris, C.J. & Brown, J. dissent. Carleton Harris, Chief Justice. If the record reflected that Mr.

Tedford v. Vaulx

183 Ark. 240 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 16, 1931

Belcher v. Harr, 94 Ark. 221 , 126 S. W. 714 ; Witherspoon v. Duncan, 21 Ark. 240 ; Driver v. Friedham, 43 Ark. 203 ; Smith v. Hollos, 46 Ark. 17 ; Burcham v. Terry, 55 Ark. 398 , 18 S. … board for adjustment if the assessment was excessive.

Blaylock v. Herrington

219 Ark. 939 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 4, 1952

The appellee, Ernestine Brown Herrington, brought this suit in replevin to recover possession of a Chevrolet sedan. … A forged deed does not convey title, Williams v. Warren, 214 Ark. 506 , 216 S. W. 2d 879 , and this statute does not lay down a different rule as to automobile titles. Second, it is contended that Mrs.

Miller Levee District No. 2 v. Dale

172 Ark. 942 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 14, 1927

This is the method of assessment for local improvements which was approved by this court in Ahern v. Board of Improvement, supra, and Porter v. … Co. v. Board of Directors, 81 Ark. 562 , 99 S. W. 843 . It follows, from the rule announced in the above case, that the land in appellant district is, in fact, assessed according to its benefits.

Read v. State

242 Ark. 821 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 5, 1967

Officers Shirley and Rowe (who were accompanied by Police Chief Brown, now deceased) made the arrest. … Maples v. State, 226 Ark. 485 , 290 S. W. 2d 627 . Affirmed. Brown, J., disqualified and not participating.

Walsh v. Campbell

240 Ark. 1034 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 6, 1966

We reviewed several cases in Jeffery v. Trevathan, 215 Ark. 311 , 220 S. … Our cases were again reviewed in Campbell v. Ark. State Hospital, 228 Ark. 205 , 306 S.

Thacker v. State

253 Ark. 864 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 29, 1973

Brown v. State, 252 Ark. 846 , 481 S.W. 2d 366 ; Nash v. State, 248 Ark. 323 , 451 S.W. 2d 869 ; Striplin v. State, 100 Ark. 132 , 139 S. W. 1128 ; Walker v. State, 100 Ark. 180 , 139 S.W. 1139 . … Brown v. State, 252 Ark. 846 (1972), 481 S.W. 2d 366 ; Ridgeway v. State, 251 Ark. 157 , 472 S.W. 2d 108 ; Poe v. State, 251 Ark. 35 , 470 S.W. 2d 818 .

Barrett Hamilton, Inc. v. Heublein

242 Ark. 900 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 5, 1967

In this we find no merit, for as we have already shown under Point II, there was substantial evidence to support the Board’s finding. POINT V. … At the start of the Board hearing, each of the three Board members was sworn and responded quite frankly to appellant’s examination.

Weakley v. State

168 Ark. 1087 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 8, 1925

Kinslow v. State, 85 Ark. 515 ; Bradshaw v. State, 95 Ark. 409 . Mr. Bishop says:. … Co. v.

Clark v. Farmers Exchange, Inc.

347 Ark. 81 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 29, 2001

Board member Mr. Glenn Featherston testified to problems with the advertising budget, which he stated the board asked Clark to reduce, and instead she increased. … As noted, board members testified that as they neared November 1998, Clark was unable to see well enough or communicate well enough to handle board meetings.

Connelly v. Beauchamp

178 Ark. 1036 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 28, 1929

Appellants call attention to the case of District of Columbia v. Clephane, 110 U. S. 212 , 3 S. Ct. 568 . … Hayes Grain & Commission Co. v. Federal Grain Co., 169 Ark. 1072 , 277 S. W. 521 ; Hot Springs Ry. Co. v. Maher, 48 Ark. 522 , 3 S. W. 639 ; Blytheville Courier v. McCall, 169 Ark. 148 , 273 S. W. 368 .

Fort Smith District v. Eberle

125 Ark. 350 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 2, 1916

Cotham v. Coffman, 111 Ark. 115 . … Cotham v. Coffman, supra. It follows that the judgment of the circuit court is erroneous, and it is reversed and the cause dismissed.

Kroger Co. v. Standard

283 Ark. 44 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 18, 1984

Garden City v. Commercial Turf Irrigation, 230 Kan. 272 , 634 P.2d 1067 (1981); overruling Anstaett v. Christesen, 192 Kan. 572 , 389 P.2d 773 (1964), and Hawkins v. Wilson, 174 Kan. 602 , 257 P.2d 1110 (1953). … Other employees of Kroger testified that appellee was open and above board with everything he did in relation to the transaction here in question.

Jones v. Williams

220 Ark. 555 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 19, 1952

, in their discretion, take a portion of one district and add it to another upon the petition of a majority of the qualified electors, residing in such district from which same is taken, * * V’ Section 80-409 provides: “The … The identical question pr esented has been determined adversely to appellants’ contention by this court in the very recent case of Altus-Denning School District No. 31 v.

Dent v. Peoples Bank

118 Ark. 157 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 12, 1915

Bank v. Berry, 53 Kan. 696 , 37 Pac. 131 . … at the meetings of the board, than any other director of the company.

St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Hix

101 Ark. 90 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 20, 1911

He failed to board the train because, as he claimed, it did not stop; and, as-he attempted to board it while it passed slowly by, he was thrown down and injured. … Osborn v. LeMaire, 82 Ark. 491 . On the other branch of the case, the jury awarded damages in the sum of $400, which we think is clearly excessive.