Case law

Commercial Energy Users Group v. Arkansas Public Service Commission

369 Ark. 13 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 15, 2007

AWG cites Brown v. Arkansas Public Service Commission, 17 Ark. … See Campbell v.

Orr v. Love

225 Ark. 505 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 7, 1955

W. 2d. 433 ; McWilliams v. Neill, 202 Ark. 1087 , 155 S. W. 2d 344 ; Smith v. Boswell, 93 Ark. 66 , 124 S. W. 264 . … Page on Wills, Vol. 2, p. 644; Zeigler v. Coffin, 219 Ala. 536 . The cause is tried de novo here and the preponderance of the evidence rule prevails. Brown v. Emerson, 205 Ark. 735 , 170 S. W. 2d. 1019 .

Pakay v. Davis

367 Ark. 421 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 12, 2006

, the Board adopted a gauge that can apply in its place. … Raney v. Raulston, supra. In order to comply with the intent of the people, our obligation is to apply some standard, regardless of its name or title given by the Federal Reserve Board.

Baldwin v. Rushing

254 Ark. 1042 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 23, 1973

member board was a de facto equalization board and its actions were not void. … See Pennington v. Oliver, 245 Ark. 251 , 431 S.W. 2d 843 ; Gilmore v. Lawrence County, Ark., 246 Ark. 614 , 439 S.W. 2d 643 .

Slagle v. Box

124 Ark. 43 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 15, 1916

Simpson v. Brown-Desnoyers Shoe Co., 70 Ark. 598 ; Brown v. … Borden v. Peay, supra; Biscoe v. Jenkins, 10 Ark. 108 ; Mason v. Howell, 14 Ark. 199 .

Night Clubs, Inc. v. Fort Smith Planning Commission

336 Ark. 130 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 21, 1999

Jones, supra; Dougan v. State, 322 Ark. 384 , 912 S.W.2d 400 (1995). We previously interpreted the requirements of Ark. Code Ann. § 14-56-425 in Board of Zoning Adjustment v. Cheek, 328 Ark. 18 , 942 S.W.2d 821 (1997). … See State v. Torres, 309 Ark. 422 , 831 S.W.2d 903 (1992); Carter v. State, 225 Ark. 225 , 500 S.W.2d 368 (1973).

St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Williams

108 Ark. 387 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 19, 1913

In Ringelhaupt v. … Co. v.

Parker v. Pace & Davis

190 Ark. 950 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 6, 1935

Emberson v. Adams County, 93 Neb. 823 , 142 N. W. 294 . To the same effect are the following cases: K. C., K. V. & W. R. Co. v. Bristow, 101 Kan. 557 , 167 Pac. 1138 ; Thrailkill v. Crosbyton-South Plains R. … Co., 246 Fed. 687 ; Heinz v. National Bank of Commerce, 237 Fed. 942 ; McCulloch. v. State of Md., 4 Wheat. 316 , 4 L. ed. 314.

Toan v. Falbo

268 Ark. 337 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 7, 1980

On the other hand, we have held a court of equity is without jurisdiction to issue an injunction preventing a board or commission from hearing a case where the board or commission had jurisdiction. … Eclectic State Medical Board v. Beatty, 203 Ark. 294 , 156 S.W. 2d 246 (1941).

Fry v. Poe

175 Ark. 375 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 14, 1927

Kansas City, Pittsburg & Gulf Ry. v. Waterworks Imp. Dist. No. 1 of Siloam Springs, 68 Ark. 376 , 59 S. W. 248 ; Imp. Dist. No. 1 of Clarendon v. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co., 99 Ark. 508 , 139 S. … W. 308 ; City of Malvern v. Nunn, 127 Ark. 418 , 192 S. W. 909 ; Walton v. Light Imp. Dist. No. 1, 144 Ark. 249 , 222 S. W. 1056 ; and Hill v. Walthour, 166 Ark. 277 , 266 S. W. 85 . In Craig v.

Reynolds v. Baker

209 Ark. 596 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 21, 1946

Louis v. Public Service Commission of Missouri, 270 Mo. 429 , 192 S. W. 958 . Consent is given when we yield that which we have a right to withhold. … No. 21 v. Common School District No. 87, 183 Ark. 329 , 35 S. W. 2d 587 , and Perry v. Gill, 184 Ark. 1099 , 44 S.

Baxter County Newspapers, Inc. v. Medical Staff of Baxter General Hospital

273 Ark. 511 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 28, 1981

We have held that when a Board is subject to the provisions of the act, its committees are also subject to the act. Ark. Gazette Co. v. Pickens, 258 Ark. 69 , 522 S.W. 2d 350 (1975). … In Laman v.

Henley v. Goggin

241 Ark. 348 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 7, 1966

Goggin, individually and as Chairman of the Searcy County Board of Election Commissioners; C. H. Campbell, individually and as a member of the Searcy County Board of Election Commissioners: and Mrs. … (Faubus v. Miles, 237 Ark. 957 , 377 S. W. 2d 601 ); but when the conflict between the statute and the Constitution is irreconciliable, then the statute must be held to be superseded.

Latham v. State

318 Ark. 19 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 19, 1994

In People v. … See United States v. Lustig, 555 F.2d 737, 745-46 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1045 . . . . * * * Brown presents no showing of prejudice from the excusal.

Heiskell v. H. C. Enterprise, Inc.

244 Ark. 857 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 13, 1968

It seems inescapable to me that the only inference to be drawn from the statement is that the Library Board agreed not to contend that acceptance of final payment waived any breach by the Library Board, as it might have contended … I am authorized to state that BrowN, J., joins in this dissent.

Roberts v. Pace

230 Ark. 280 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 23, 1959

A hearing was had before the Board at which time appellants appeared and entered their objections. … See Cernauskas v. Fletcher, 211 Ark. 678 , 201 S. W. 2d 999 , and Risser v. Little Rock, 225 Ark. 318 , 281 S. W. 2d 949 . For the reasons above stated, the decree of the trial court must be, and it is hereby, reversed.

Westbrook v. State

286 Ark. 192 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 10, 1985

The appellant relies upon Ravellette v. … Toland v. State, 285 Ark. 415 , 688 S. W. 2d 718 (1985). It is also stated by counsel that in any event Westbrook should be allowed to petition the trial court for postconviction relief under Rule 37.

Adams v. Dixie School District No. 7

264 Ark. 178 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 5, 1978

Jur. 2d ELECTIONS, Sec. 316; State Ex Rel Brooks v. Baxter, 28 Ark. 129 (1873), Baxter v. … In Sumpter v. Duffie, 80 Ark. 369 , 97 S.W. 435 (1906), and Glidewell v.

Mullins v. City of Little Book

113 Ark. 590 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 6, 1914

Ferguson v. McLean, 113 Ark. 193 . … It is true this court held in McDonnell v.

Water Improvement District 1 of Benton v. Briner

185 Ark. 742 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 2, 1932

And shall represent said board of commissioners in all suits brought for or against said board of commissioners.” … W. 941 , and Martin v. Street Imp. Dist. No. 349, 178 Ark. 588 , 11 S. W. (2d) 469 .